457 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26928774)
1. Active Polysubstance Abuse Concurrent With Surgery as a Possible Newly Identified Infection Risk Factor in Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement Based on a Retrospective Analysis of Health and Socioeconomic Factors.
Balen A; Gross MS; Phillips EA; Henry GD; Munarriz R
J Sex Med; 2016 Apr; 13(4):697-701. PubMed ID: 26928774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Infection risk of undergoing multiple penile prostheses: an analysis of referred patient surgical histories.
Montgomery BD; Lomas DJ; Ziegelmann MJ; Trost LW
Int J Impot Res; 2018 Aug; 30(4):147-152. PubMed ID: 29795529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Delayed postoperative hematoma formation after inflatable penile prosthesis implantation.
Garber BB; Bickell M
J Sex Med; 2015 Jan; 12(1):265-9. PubMed ID: 25349141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Penile Prosthesis Infections-A Review of Risk Factors, Prevention, and Treatment.
Pineda M; Burnett AL
Sex Med Rev; 2016 Oct; 4(4):389-398. PubMed ID: 27872031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 3-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement Following Radical Cystoprostatectomy and Urinary Diversion: Technique and Outcomes.
Loh-Doyle J; Patil MB; Sawkar H; Wayne K; Boyd SD
J Sex Med; 2018 Jun; 15(6):907-913. PubMed ID: 29452979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of Surgeon Case Volume on Reoperation Rates after Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Surgery.
Onyeji IC; Sui W; Pagano MJ; Weinberg AC; James MB; Theofanides MC; Stember DS; Anderson CB; Stahl PJ
J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):223-229. PubMed ID: 27545573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Damage Control Considerations During IPP Surgery.
Yang DY; Kohler TS
Curr Urol Rep; 2019 Jan; 20(2):10. PubMed ID: 30701330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Salmonella infection of a penile prosthesis.
Sausville J; Gupta G; Forrest G; Chai T
J Sex Med; 2009 May; 6(5):1487-90. PubMed ID: 18823319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term revision rate due to infection in hydrophilic-coated inflatable penile prostheses: 11-year follow-up.
Serefoglu EC; Mandava SH; Gokce A; Chouhan JD; Wilson SK; Hellstrom WJ
J Sex Med; 2012 Aug; 9(8):2182-6. PubMed ID: 22759917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combined inflatable penile prosthesis-artificial urinary sphincter implantation: no increased risk of adverse events compared to single or staged device implantation.
Segal RL; Cabrini MR; Harris ED; Mostwin JL; Bivalacqua TJ; Burnett AL
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2183-8. PubMed ID: 23831315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of penile hydrocele following placement of inflatable penile prosthesis: a rare entity.
Raheem OA; Cohen SD; Chandrasekaran B; Goldstein I
J Sex Med; 2015 Jan; 12(1):270-3. PubMed ID: 25353307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An outcomes analysis of over 200 revision surgeries for penile prosthesis implantation: a multicenter study.
Henry GD; Donatucci CF; Conners W; Greenfield JM; Carson CC; Wilson SK; Delk J; Lentz AC; Cleves MA; Jennermann CJ; Kramer AC
J Sex Med; 2012 Jan; 9(1):309-15. PubMed ID: 22082149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Penile prosthesis surgery: a review of prosthetic devices and associated complications.
Sadeghi-Nejad H
J Sex Med; 2007 Mar; 4(2):296-309. PubMed ID: 17367425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term infection outcomes after original antibiotic impregnated inflatable penile prosthesis implants: up to 7.7 years of followup.
Carson CC; Mulcahy JJ; Harsch MR
J Urol; 2011 Feb; 185(2):614-8. PubMed ID: 21168870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does climate impact inflatable penile prosthesis infection (IPP) risk? Assessment of temperature and dew point on IPP infections.
Barham DW; Pyrgidis N; Amini E; Hammad M; Miller J; Andrianne R; Burnett AL; Gross K; Hatzichristodoulou G; Hotaling J; Hsieh TC; Jenkins LC; Jones JM; Lentz A; Modgil V; Osmonov D; Park SH; Pearce I; Perito P; Sadeghi-Nejad H; Sempels M; Suarez-Sarmiento A; Simhan J; van Renterghem K; Warner JN; Ziegelmann M; Yafi FA; Gross MS;
J Sex Med; 2024 Apr; 21(5):500-504. PubMed ID: 38481017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Coated implants and "no touch" surgical technique decreases risk of infection in inflatable penile prosthesis implantation to 0.46%.
Eid JF; Wilson SK; Cleves M; Salem EA
Urology; 2012 Jun; 79(6):1310-5. PubMed ID: 22521187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multicenter Investigation of Fungal Infections of Inflatable Penile Prostheses.
Gross MS; Reinstatler L; Henry GD; Honig SC; Stahl PJ; Burnett AL; Maria PP; Bennett NE; Kava BR; Kohler TS; Beilan JA; Carrion RE; Munarriz RM
J Sex Med; 2019 Jul; 16(7):1100-1105. PubMed ID: 31255212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimizing Penile Implant Infection: A Literature Review of Patient and Surgical Factors.
Holland B; Kohler T
Curr Urol Rep; 2015 Dec; 16(12):81. PubMed ID: 26480830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proximal corporal reconstruction: adjunct of penile prosthesis revision surgery.
Rajih E; Burnett AL
Int J Impot Res; 2020 Jan; 32(1):107-112. PubMed ID: 30705434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between AMS 700™ CX and Coloplast™ Titan inflatable penile prosthesis for Peyronie's disease treatment and remodeling: clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.
Chung E; Solomon M; DeYoung L; Brock GB
J Sex Med; 2013 Nov; 10(11):2855-60. PubMed ID: 23210973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
