410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26928821)
1. Consumer Perceptions of Interactions With Primary Care Providers After Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing.
van der Wouden CH; Carere DA; Maitland-van der Zee AH; Ruffin MT; Roberts JS; Green RC;
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Apr; 164(8):513-22. PubMed ID: 26928821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: User Motivations, Decision Making, and Perceived Utility of Results.
Roberts JS; Gornick MC; Carere DA; Uhlmann WR; Ruffin MT; Green RC
Public Health Genomics; 2017; 20(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 28068660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Australians' knowledge and perceptions of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.
Savard J; Mooney-Somers J; Newson AJ; Kerridge I
Intern Med J; 2014 Jan; 44(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 24450520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prescription medication changes following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing: findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study.
Carere DA; VanderWeele TJ; Vassy JL; van der Wouden CH; Roberts JS; Kraft P; Green RC
Genet Med; 2017 May; 19(5):537-545. PubMed ID: 27657683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Utilization of Genetic Counseling after Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study.
Koeller DR; Uhlmann WR; Carere DA; Green RC; Roberts JS;
J Genet Couns; 2017 Dec; 26(6):1270-1279. PubMed ID: 28512697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. From Expectations to Experiences: Consumer Autonomy and Choice in Personal Genomic Testing.
Savard J; Hickerton C; Metcalfe SA; Gaff C; Middleton A; Newson AJ
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2020; 11(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 31885332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Are providers prepared for genomic medicine: interpretation of Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) results and genetic self-efficacy by medical professionals.
McGrath SP; Walton N; Williams MS; Kim KK; Bastola K
BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Nov; 19(1):844. PubMed ID: 31760949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of personal genomic testing for disease-prevention behavior when combined with careful consultation with a physician: a preliminary study.
Hayashi M; Watanabe A; Muramatsu M; Yamashita N
BMC Res Notes; 2018 Apr; 11(1):223. PubMed ID: 29615115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Personal Genomic Testing for Cancer Risk: Results From the Impact of Personal Genomics Study.
Gray SW; Gollust SE; Carere DA; Chen CA; Cronin A; Kalia SS; Rana HQ; Ruffin MT; Wang C; Roberts JS; Green RC
J Clin Oncol; 2017 Feb; 35(6):636-644. PubMed ID: 27937091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.
Covolo L; Rubinelli S; Ceretti E; Gelatti U
J Med Internet Res; 2015 Dec; 17(12):e279. PubMed ID: 26677835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing on perceived risk of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer: findings from the PGen study.
Carere DA; VanderWeele T; Moreno TA; Mountain JL; Roberts JS; Kraft P; Green RC;
BMC Med Genomics; 2015 Oct; 8():63. PubMed ID: 26468061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Informing the Design of Direct-to-Consumer Interactive Personal Genomics Reports.
Shaer O; Nov O; Okerlund J; Balestra M; Stowell E; Ascher L; Bi J; Schlenker C; Ball M
J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jun; 17(6):e146. PubMed ID: 26070951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diet and exercise changes following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing.
Nielsen DE; Carere DA; Wang C; Roberts JS; Green RC;
BMC Med Genomics; 2017 May; 10(1):24. PubMed ID: 28464943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Consumers report lower confidence in their genetics knowledge following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing.
Carere DA; Kraft P; Kaphingst KA; Roberts JS; Green RC
Genet Med; 2016 Jan; 18(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 25812042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetic counseling following direct-to consumer genetic testing: Consumer perspectives.
Marzulla T; Roberts JS; DeVries R; Koeller DR; Green RC; Uhlmann WR
J Genet Couns; 2021 Feb; 30(1):329-334. PubMed ID: 32648332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Australians' perspectives on support around use of personal genomic testing: Findings from the Genioz study.
Metcalfe SA; Hickerton C; Savard J; Stackpoole E; Tytherleigh R; Tutty E; Terrill B; Turbitt E; Gray K; Middleton A; Wilson B; Newson AJ; Gaff C
Eur J Med Genet; 2019 May; 62(5):290-299. PubMed ID: 30439534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characteristics of genomic test consumers who spontaneously share results with their health care provider.
Darst BF; Madlensky L; Schork NJ; Topol EJ; Bloss CS
Health Commun; 2014; 29(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 23384116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Policy in Korea Based on Consumer Preference.
Jeong G
Public Health Genomics; 2017; 20(3):166-173. PubMed ID: 28817817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. "I would rather have it done by a doctor"-laypeople's perceptions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC GT) and its ethical implications.
Schaper M; Wöhlke S; Schicktanz S
Med Health Care Philos; 2019 Mar; 22(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 29705970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors Associated with Acceptability, Consideration and Intention of Uptake of Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Survey Study.
Stewart KFJ; Kokole D; Wesselius A; Schols AMWJ; Zeegers MP; de Vries H; van Osch LADM
Public Health Genomics; 2018; 21(1-2):45-52. PubMed ID: 30359983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
