These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26929495)

  • 1. Comparative evaluation of reproducibility of peripheral tissues produced by different border molding materials in edentulous patients: An in vivo study.
    Arora AK; Goyal I; Sehgal M
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2015; 15(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 26929495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation and Comparison of the Effect of Different Border Molding Materials on Complete Denture Retention: An in vivo Study.
    Pachar RB; Singla Y; Kumar P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):982-987. PubMed ID: 30150501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative evaluation of border molding, using two different techniques in maxillary edentulous arches - An in vivo study.
    Yarapatineni R; Vilekar A; Kumar JP; Kumar GA; Aravind P; Kumar PA
    J Int Oral Health; 2013 Dec; 5(6):82-7. PubMed ID: 24453450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative analysis of the retention of maxillary denture base with and without border molding using zinc oxide eugenol impression paste.
    Kaur S; Datta K; Gupta SK; Suman N
    Indian J Dent; 2016; 7(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 27134447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. One-step border molding of complete denture impressions using a polyether impression material.
    Smith DE; Toolson LB; Bolender CL; Lord JL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Mar; 41(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 368323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vivo evaluation of the impact of various border molding materials and techniques on the retention of complete maxillary dentures.
    Jassim TK; Kareem AE; Alloaibi MA
    Dent Med Probl; 2020; 57(2):191-196. PubMed ID: 32649808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of border molding using two different techniques in maxillary edentulous arches: A clinical study.
    Qanungo A; Aras MA; Chitre V; Coutinho I; Rajagopal P; Mysore A
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2016; 16(4):340-345. PubMed ID: 27746597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variability in the shape of maxillary vestibular impressions recorded with modeling plastic and a polyether impression material.
    Tan HK; Hooper PM; Baergen CG
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 8957865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laboratory investigation of Accuracy of Impression Materials for Border Molding.
    Shopova D; Slavchev D
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2019 Sep; 61(3):435-443. PubMed ID: 32337931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An alternative impression technique for complete dentures.
    Yilmaz B; Özçelik TB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Feb; 111(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 24286641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A complete denture impression technique survey of postdoctoral prosthodontic programs in the United States.
    Mehra M; Vahidi F; Berg RW
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 24118134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A survey of U.S. prosthodontists and dental schools on the current materials and methods for final impressions for complete denture prosthodontics.
    Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Dec; 14(4):253-62. PubMed ID: 16359482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A technique for border molding edentulous impressions using vinyl polysiloxane material.
    Chaffee NR; Cooper LF; Felton DA
    J Prosthodont; 1999 Jun; 8(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 10740512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A retrospective comparison of two definitive impression techniques and their associated postinsertion adjustments in complete denture prosthodontics.
    Drago CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 12(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 14508741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative clinical trial for evaluating the posterior palatal seal developed from the conventional method and a novel functional swallow method.
    Mishra S; Krishna R; Mandokar RB; Agarwal S; Sharma A; Shaw M
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(1):21-28. PubMed ID: 36510944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modified functional impression technique for complete dentures.
    Malachias A; Paranhos Hde F; da Silva CH; Muglia VA; Moreto C
    Braz Dent J; 2005; 16(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 16475608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Making accurate final impressions for the fabrication of complete dentures. 1: Maxillary impressions.
    Clancy JM; Dixon DL
    Iowa Dent J; 1990 Oct; 76(4):21-3. PubMed ID: 2279916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical Negative Pressure Measurement after Border Molding Procedure.
    Shopova DA; Slavchev D
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2020 Sep; 62(3):578-584. PubMed ID: 33009756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A modified technique for single-step border molding.
    Pawar RS; Kulkarni RS; Raipure PE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):654-657. PubMed ID: 30017163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The results of a brief survey of complete denture prosthodontic techniques in predoctoral programs in North American dental schools.
    Arbree NS; Fleck S; Askinas SW
    J Prosthodont; 1996 Sep; 5(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 9028228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.