188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26929559)
41. A clinical prospective randomized comparative study on ostyeosynthesis of mandibular anterior fractures following open reduction using lag screws and miniplates.
Mittal G; Aggrawal A; Garg R; Sharma S; Rathi A; Sharma V
Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2017; 8(2):110-116. PubMed ID: 29386813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparison Between Conventional Titanium Miniplates and Indigenous Detachable Custom made 3D Titanium Plates (VAS 3D Bone Plate) for Fixation of Mandibular Fracture in Mental Foramen Region: A Randomized Clinical Trial and Finite Element Analysis.
Thapliyal S; Mowar A; Bansal V
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2022 Mar; 21(1):211-218. PubMed ID: 35400927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. New design titanium miniplate versus conventional miniplate in treatment of mandibular angle fractures: A comparative study.
Vishnani R; Pattanshetti C; Gilani R; Sankeshwari B
Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2023; 14(3):420-425. PubMed ID: 38273910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Clinical observation of improved titanium miniplate internal fixation for mandibular fracture].
Deng WZ; Guo Q; Qiu WF; Huang RX
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Aug; 17(4):444-6. PubMed ID: 18784892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. An In vitro study of biomechanical comparison between titanium 4-hole 3D plates and titanium conventional 4-hole miniplates for internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures.
Tharakan M; Kumar L K S; Chandrachood M
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2022; 12(5):683-686. PubMed ID: 36071928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparative evaluation of different miniplates for internal fixation of mandible fractures using finite element analysis.
Arbag H; Korkmaz HH; Ozturk K; Uyar Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 66(6):1225-32. PubMed ID: 18486788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparative study between patient specific titanium plates versus conventional miniplates for treatment of mandibular fractures: Randomized clinical trial.
Taalab DA; Shehab AF; Atef M; Shehab MF
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2023 Apr; 51(4):217-223. PubMed ID: 37068986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of 3-dimensional and standard miniplate fixation in the management of mandibular fractures.
Jain MK; Manjunath KS; Bhagwan BK; Shah DK
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1568-72. PubMed ID: 20417012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Titanium Lag Screw Versus Miniplate Fixation in the Treatment of Anterior Mandibular Fractures.
Tiwari M; Meshram V; Lambade P; Fernandes G
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 May; 77(5):1031-1039. PubMed ID: 30763527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Three-dimensional Locking Plate and Conventional Miniplates in the Treatment of Mandibular Anterior Fractures.
Budhraja NJ; Shenoi RS; Badjate SJ; Bang KO; Ingole PD; Kolte VS
Ann Maxillofac Surg; 2018; 8(1):73-77. PubMed ID: 29963428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Open reduction and internal fixation of severely dislocated fractures of condylar neck and base using bioabsorbable miniplate in children: a 3-10 years follow-up study.
Zhang B; Liu ZH; Li J; Zhang K; Chen JJ; Zhang RM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Nov; 78(11):1987-92. PubMed ID: 25249485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. An in-vitro evaluation of a novel design of miniplate for fixation of fracture segments in the transition zone of parasymphysis-body region of mandible using finite element analysis.
Datarkar A; Tayal S; Thote A; Galie M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 47(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 30527379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Transoral miniplate fixation of mandibular body fracture without maxillomandibular fixation: report of 45 cases].
Yan HH; DU HJ; Huang HR
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2007 Aug; 16(4):385-7. PubMed ID: 17924023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison between three-dimensional and standard miniplates in the management of mandibular angle fractures: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical study.
Al-Moraissi EA; Mounair RM; El-Sharkawy TM; El-Ghareeb TI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 44(3):316-21. PubMed ID: 25457871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Standard 3D Titanium Miniplate Versus Locking 3D Miniplate in Fracture of Mandible: A Prospective Comparative Study.
Singh A; Arunkumar KV
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2016 Jun; 15(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 27298539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Which fixation methods are better between three-dimensional anatomical plate and two miniplates for the mandibular subcondylar fracture open treatment?
Sukegawa S; Kanno T; Masui M; Sukegawa-Takahashi Y; Kishimoto T; Sato A; Furuki Y
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 May; 47(5):771-777. PubMed ID: 30770259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Strength of titanium intramedullary implant versus miniplate fixation of mandibular condyle fractures.
Frake PC; Howell RJ; Joshi AS
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Jul; 147(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 22394553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. 3-D Miniplates Versus Conventional Miniplates in Treatment of Mandible Fractures.
Mishra N; Thakkar N; Kar I; Baig SA; Sharma G; Kar R; Sahu GR; Birmiwal KG
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2019 Mar; 18(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 30728695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Six-hole versus Four-hole Miniplates in Isolated, Unilateral Angle Fracture of the Mandible.
Kumar AS; Saravanan B; Balaji J; Rohini T; Prasad C; Amirtha J
Ann Maxillofac Surg; 2020; 10(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 32855909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A comparative evaluation of different treatment modalities for parasymphysis fractures: a pilot study.
Saluja H; Kini Y; Mahindra U; Kharkar V; Rudagi BM; Dehane V
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 41(8):906-11. PubMed ID: 22658265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
