201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26929952)
1. Screw Joint Stability in Conventional and Abutment-Free Implant-Supported Fixed Restorations.
Scherg S; Karl M
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 26929952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Strain development of screw-retained implant-supported fixed restorations: procera implant bridge versus conventionally cast restorations.
Karl M; Holst S
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):166-9. PubMed ID: 22371839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro mechanical analysis of complete-arch mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses abutment screws after cyclic loading.
Sananez A; Lefebvre C; Looney S; Baker P; Mettenburg D; Rueggeberg FA
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 May; 113(5):432-9. PubMed ID: 25682530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of engaging abutment position in implant-borne, screw-retained three-unit fixed cantilevered prostheses.
Dogus SM; Kurtz KS; Watanabe I; Griggs JA
J Prosthodont; 2011 Jul; 20(5):348-54. PubMed ID: 21585587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of torque maintenance of abutment and cylinder screws with Morse taper implants.
Ferreira MB; Delben JA; Barão VA; Faverani LP; Dos Santos PH; Assunção WG
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(6):e631-4. PubMed ID: 23172504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal fit and photoelastic stress analysis of CAD-CAM and overcast 3-unit implant-supported frameworks.
Presotto AG; Bhering CL; Mesquita MF; Barão VA
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 27666497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of abutment type and esthetic veneering on preload maintenance of abutment screw of implant-supported crowns.
Delben JA; Barão VA; Dos Santos PH; Assunção WG
J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 23725369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of different maintenance time of torque application on detorque values of abutment screws in full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Al-Otaibi HN; Al-Fouzan AF; Al-Mufleh TS; Labban N
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Oct; 20(5):848-851. PubMed ID: 30110139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of loading on the preload and dimensions of the abutment screw for a 3-unit cantilever-fixed prosthesis design.
Setia G; Yousef H; Ehrenberg D; Luke A; Weiner S
Implant Dent; 2013 Aug; 22(4):414-21. PubMed ID: 23842028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of material selection on the passivity of fit of implant-supported restorations created with computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture.
Karl M; Taylor TD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):739-45. PubMed ID: 21841982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of CAD/CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses.
de França DG; Morais MH; das Neves FD; Barbosa GA
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 25277028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical evaluation of screw- and cement-retained implant-supported prostheses: a nonlinear finite element analysis.
Silva GC; Cornacchia TM; de Magalhães CS; Bueno AC; Moreira AN
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1479-88. PubMed ID: 25062583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro precision of fit of computer-aided designed and computer-aided manufactured titanium screw-retained fixed dental prostheses before and after ceramic veneering.
Katsoulis J; Mericske-Stern R; Enkling N; Katsoulis K; Blatz MB
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 24289301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of various fixation parameters on strain development of screw- and cement-retained implant-supported restorations.
Schittenhelm B; Karl M; Graef F; Heckmann S; Taylor T
Quintessence Int; 2013; 44(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 23534049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screw loading and gap formation in implant supported fixed restorations: Procera implant bridge vs. conventionally cast screw-retained restorations.
Winter W; Karl M
Quintessence Int; 2013 Mar; 44(3):263-6. PubMed ID: 23444207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Torque Maintenance of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Anterior Fixed Dental Prosthesis with Different Abutment Angulations After Aging.
Al-Zordk W; Al-Dobaisi T; Ghazy M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(4):723-729. PubMed ID: 34411211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann M; Krafft T
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 22475466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fit and Stability of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Frameworks Under Masticatory Simulation: Influence of Cylinder Type.
Bhering CL; Marques Ida S; Takahashi JM; Barão VA; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
J Prosthodont; 2016 Aug; 25(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 26465960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
