216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26929961)
21. Probability of survival of implant-supported metal ceramic and CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic crowns.
Bonfante EA; Suzuki M; Lorenzoni FC; Sena LA; Hirata R; Bonfante G; Coelho PG
Dent Mater; 2015 Aug; 31(8):e168-77. PubMed ID: 26074312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of implant-abutment connection design on reliability of crowns: regular vs. horizontal mismatched platform.
Freitas Júnior AC; Bonfante EA; Silva NR; Marotta L; Coelho PG
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Sep; 23(9):1123-6. PubMed ID: 22092300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of platform diameter in the reliability and failure mode of extra-short dental implants.
Bordin D; Bergamo ETP; Bonfante EA; Fardin VP; Coelho PG
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Jan; 77():470-474. PubMed ID: 29032313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Survival and failure modes: platform-switching for internal and external hexagon cemented fixed dental prostheses.
Anchieta RB; Machado LS; Hirata R; Coelho PG; Bonfante EA
Eur J Oral Sci; 2016 Oct; 124(5):490-497. PubMed ID: 27680671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of implant diameter on reliability and failure modes of molar crowns.
Freitas-Junior AC; Bonfante EA; Martins LM; Silva NR; Marotta L; Coelho PG
Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(6):557-61. PubMed ID: 22146255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of abutment screw surface treatment on reliability of implant-supported crowns.
Anchieta RB; Machado LS; Bonfante EA; Hirata R; Freitas AC; Coelho PG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(3):585-92. PubMed ID: 24818196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Implant-abutment fit influences the mechanical performance of single-crown prostheses.
Ramalho IS; Bergamo ETP; Witek L; Coelho PG; Lopes ACO; Bonfante EA
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Feb; 102():103506. PubMed ID: 31877515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Probability of Failure of Internal Hexagon and Morse Taper Implants with Different Bone Levels: A Mechanical Test and Probabilistic Fatigue.
Prados-Privado M; Gehrke SA; Rojo R; Prados-Frutos JC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1266-1273. PubMed ID: 30427957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Probability of survival and stress distribution of narrow diameter implants with different implant-abutment taper angles.
Freitas MIM; Gomes RS; Ruggiero MM; Bergamo ETP; Bonfante EA; Marcello-Machado RM; Del Bel Cury AA
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2022 Mar; 110(3):638-645. PubMed ID: 34559448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effect of different implant-abutment connections on screw joint stability.
Michalakis KX; Calvani PL; Muftu S; Pissiotis A; Hirayama H
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 24779947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fatigue Failure of External Hexagon Connections on Cemented Implant-Supported Crowns.
Malta Barbosa J; Navarro da Rocha D; Hirata R; Freitas G; Bonfante EA; Coelho PG
Implant Dent; 2018 Apr; 27(2):165-170. PubMed ID: 29351113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Analysis of Implant Strength After Implantoplasty in Three Implant-Abutment Connection Designs: An In Vitro Study.
Gehrke SA; Aramburú Júnior JS; Dedavid BA; Shibli JA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):e65-70. PubMed ID: 27183084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. In vitro performance of zirconia and titanium implant/abutment systems for anterior application.
Rosentritt M; Hagemann A; Hahnel S; Behr M; Preis V
J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):1019-26. PubMed ID: 24699071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reliability evaluation of alumina-blasted/acid-etched versus laser-sintered dental implants.
Almeida EO; Júnior AC; Bonfante EA; Silva NR; Coelho PG
Lasers Med Sci; 2013 May; 28(3):851-8. PubMed ID: 22843309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of insertion torque on the structure of dental implants with different connections: Experimental pilot study in vitro.
Gehrke SA; Pereira GMA; Gehrke AF; Junior NB; Dedavid BA
PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251904. PubMed ID: 34010325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
