209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26930769)
1. [Evaluation of the quality of proximal restorations with plastic materials: radiographic study].
Karimi Z; Kessa S; Chala S; Abdallaoui F
Odontostomatol Trop; 2015 Sep; 38(151):5-12. PubMed ID: 26930769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.
Hickel R; Manhart J; García-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):41D-54D. PubMed ID: 11763918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A study of primary teeth restored by intracoronal restorations in children participating in an undergraduate teaching programme at Cork University Dental School and Hospital, Ireland.
Hurley E; Da Mata C; Stewart C; Kinirons M
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 25793959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials.
Lai GY; Zhu LK; Li MY; Wang J
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Higher experience of caries and lower income trajectory influence the quality of restorations: A multilevel analysis in a birth cohort.
Collares K; Opdam NJ; Peres KG; Peres MA; Horta BL; Demarco FF; Correa MB
J Dent; 2018 Jan; 68():79-84. PubMed ID: 29169969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of the performance and safety of a new dentine substitute, Biodentine, in the restoration of posterior teeth - a prospective study.
Koubi G; Colon P; Franquin JC; Hartmann A; Richard G; Faure MO; Lambert G
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):243-9. PubMed ID: 22411260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do socioeconomic determinants affect the quality of posterior dental restorations? A multilevel approach.
Correa MB; Peres MA; Peres KG; Horta BL; Barros AJ; Demarco FF
J Dent; 2013 Nov; 41(11):960-7. PubMed ID: 23454330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations.
Kiremitci A; Alpaslan T; Gurgan S
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 19192832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimal invasive treatment for defective restorations: five-year results using sealants.
Martin J; Fernandez E; Estay J; Gordan VV; Mjor IA; Moncada G
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 22788726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-year clinical evaluation of cuspal coverage with combined composite-amalgam in endodontically-treated maxillary premolars.
Shafiei F; Memarpour M; Doozandeh M
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 21179997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. One-year clinical evaluation of composite restorations in posterior teeth: effect of adhesive systems.
Sundfeld RH; Scatolin RS; Oliveira FG; Machado LS; Alexandre RS; Sundefeld ML
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(6):E1-8. PubMed ID: 22621163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anaerobic microflora under Class I and Class II composite and amalgam restorations.
Splieth C; Bernhardt O; Heinrich A; Bernhardt H; Meyer G
Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 12946067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of resin-based composites in posterior restorations: two-year results.
Arhun N; Celik C; Yamanel K
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 20672723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term survival of Cerec restorations: a 10-year study.
Zimmer S; Göhlich O; Rüttermann S; Lang H; Raab WH; Barthel CR
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):484-7. PubMed ID: 18833853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.
Alves dos Santos MP; Luiz RR; Maia LC
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20188783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Review of bonded amalgam restorations, and assessment in a general practice over five years.
Smales RJ; Wetherell JD
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):374-81. PubMed ID: 11203845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Double-blind randomized clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 6-month follow-up.
Coelho-de-Souza FH; Klein-Júnior CA; Camargo JC; Beskow T; Balestrin MD; Demarco FF
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Mar; 11(2):001-8. PubMed ID: 20228981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
