These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26931560)

  • 1. Clinical impact of prostate biopsy undergrading in an academic and community setting.
    Mortezavi A; Keller EX; Poyet C; Hermanns T; Saba K; Randazzo M; Fankhauser CD; Wild PJ; Moch H; Sulser T; Eberli D
    World J Urol; 2016 Oct; 34(10):1481-90. PubMed ID: 26931560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis.
    Berg KD; Thomsen FB; Nerstrøm C; Røder MA; Iversen P; Toft BG; Vainer B; Brasso K
    BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):883-9. PubMed ID: 26823232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
    Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
    BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of Gleason score on biochemical recurrence in patients with pT3aN0/Nx prostate cancer with positive surgical margins: a multicenter study from the Prostate Cancer Research Committee.
    Song W; Lee DH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Lee HM; Choi HY; Kim JW; Lee S; Byun SS; Jeong CW; Kwak C; Cho JS; Ahn H; Jeon SS
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2017 Nov; 143(11):2393-2400. PubMed ID: 28823006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How significant is upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology while discussing less invasive treatment options?
    Suer E; Gokce MI; Gulpinar O; Guclu AG; Haciyev P; Gogus C; Turkolmez K; Baltaci S
    Scand J Urol; 2014 Apr; 48(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 23941315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adverse Disease Features in Gleason Score 3 + 4 "Favorable Intermediate-Risk" Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance.
    Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Gearman DJ; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2017 Sep; 72(3):442-447. PubMed ID: 27574819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical and pathologic predictors of Gleason sum upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series.
    Tilki D; Schlenker B; John M; Buchner A; Stanislaus P; Gratzke C; Karl A; Tan GY; Ergün S; Tewari AK; Stief CG; Seitz M; Reich O
    Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 19837614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PI-RADS Version 2.0 Versus Version 2.1: Comparison of Prostate Cancer Gleason Grade Upgrade and Downgrade Rates From MRI-Targeted Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy.
    Yilmaz EC; Lin Y; Belue MJ; Harmon SA; Phelps TE; Merriman KM; Hazen LA; Garcia C; Johnson L; Lay NS; Toubaji A; Merino MJ; Patel KR; Parnes HL; Law YM; Wood BJ; Gurram S; Choyke PL; Pinto PA; Turkbey B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2024 Jan; 222(1):e2329964. PubMed ID: 37729551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prostate cancer upgrading or downgrading of biopsy Gleason scores at radical prostatectomy: prediction of "regression to the mean" using routine clinical features with correlating biochemical relapse rates.
    Altok M; Troncoso P; Achim MF; Matin SF; Gonzalez GN; Davis JW
    Asian J Androl; 2019; 21(6):598-604. PubMed ID: 31115364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.
    Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Suh J; Macklis R; Klein E
    Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 9099457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.
    Choy B; Pearce SM; Anderson BB; Shalhav AL; Zagaja G; Eggener SE; Paner GP
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Oct; 40(10):1400-6. PubMed ID: 27379821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictors for clinically relevant Gleason score upgrade in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Thomas C; Pfirrmann K; Pieles F; Bogumil A; Gillitzer R; Wiesner C; Thüroff JW; Melchior SW
    BJU Int; 2012 Jan; 109(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 21592293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Concordance of the Gleason score in prostate multibiopsy and definitive histology].
    May M; Brookman-May S; Lebentrau S; Gilfrich C; Loy V; Theissig F; Roigas J; Hoschke B; Burger M; Miller K
    Aktuelle Urol; 2010 May; 41(3):184-92. PubMed ID: 20309804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical significance and predictors of oncologic outcome after radical prostatectomy for invisible prostate cancer on multiparametric MRI.
    Chung DY; Koh DH; Goh HJ; Kim MS; Lee JS; Jang WS; Choi YD
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Nov; 18(1):1057. PubMed ID: 30382916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
    De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
    Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Definitive pathology at radical prostatectomy is commonly favorable in men following initial active surveillance.
    Hong SK; Sternberg IA; Keren Paz GE; Kim PH; Touijer KA; Scardino PT; Eastham JA
    Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 23954083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsies and pathology following radical prostatectomy significantly impacts upon the risk of biochemical recurrence.
    Corcoran NM; Hong MK; Casey RG; Hurtado-Coll A; Peters J; Harewood L; Goldenberg SL; Hovens CM; Costello AJ; Gleave ME
    BJU Int; 2011 Oct; 108(8 Pt 2):E202-10. PubMed ID: 21443656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How does a prebiopsy mri approach for prostate cancer diagnosis affect prostatectomy upgrade rates?
    Sussman J; Haj-Hamed M; Talarek J; Verma S; Sidana A
    Urol Oncol; 2021 Nov; 39(11):784.e11-784.e16. PubMed ID: 33867247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.