BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26932216)

  • 21. Accuracy of noncycloplegic refraction in primary school children in southern Thailand.
    Funarunart P; Tengtrisorn S; Sangsupawanich P; Siangyai P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Jun; 92(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 19530586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparisons of objective and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia using binocular wavefront optometer with autorefraction and retinoscopy in school-age children.
    Lei Y; Chen X; Cheng M; Li B; Jiang Y; Xu Y; Wang X
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 261(5):1465-1472. PubMed ID: 36527496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy and accommodation capability of a handheld autorefractor.
    Wesemann W; Dick B
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2000 Jan; 26(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 10646148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A clinical study of the autorefractor, an antomatic refracting device.
    Dyson C
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1977 Jan; 12(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 849538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Accuracy of two autorefractors--Pediatric Autorefractor plusoptiX and Retinomax--in cycloplegic children in comparison to retinoscopy].
    Schmidt-Bacher AE; Kahlert C; Kolling G
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2010 Oct; 227(10):792-7. PubMed ID: 20963682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of a new photo-refractometer in young and adult patients.
    Schimitzek T; Lagrèze WA
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Jul; 243(7):637-45. PubMed ID: 15650858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Automatic refraction and the private ophthalmologist: Dioptron II compared with subjective examination.
    Mailer CM
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1978 Oct; 13(4):252-7. PubMed ID: 743607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of objective refraction in darkness to cycloplegic refraction: a pilot study.
    Vasudevan B; Ciuffreda KJ; Meehan K; Grk D; Cox M
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Mar; 99(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 26888570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of the Retinomax hand-held autorefractor versus table-top autorefractor and retinoscopy.
    Tuncer I; Zengin MO; Karahan E
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2014; 7(3):491-5. PubMed ID: 24967197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of a clinical aberrometer for lower-order accuracy and repeatability, higher-order repeatability, and instrument myopia.
    Salmon TO; van de Pol C
    Optometry; 2005 Aug; 76(8):461-72. PubMed ID: 16150413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Refractive state of tree shrew eyes measured with cortical visual evoked potentials.
    Norton TT; Wu WW; Siegwart JT
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Sep; 80(9):623-31. PubMed ID: 14502042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in primary school children.
    Choong YF; Chen AH; Goh PP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jul; 142(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 16815252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does the Accuracy and Repeatability of Refractive Error Estimates Depend on the Measurement Principle of Autorefractors?
    Padhy D; Bharadwaj SR; Nayak S; Rath S; Das T
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Jan; 10(1):2. PubMed ID: 33505769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Experiences with the hand-held autorefractometer "Retinomax" in adults and children].
    Wesemann W; Dick B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1997 Dec; 211(6):387-94. PubMed ID: 9498190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of the SVOne Handheld Autorefractor in a Pediatric Population.
    Rosenfield M; Ciuffreda KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Feb; 94(2):159-165. PubMed ID: 27668640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of Spot Vision Screener and Tabletop Autorefractometer with Retinoscopy in the Pediatric Population.
    Arslantürk Eren M; Nalcı Baytaroğlu H; Atilla H
    Turk J Ophthalmol; 2024 Apr; 54(2):56-62. PubMed ID: 38644780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of the refractive measurements with hand-held autorefractometer, table-mounted autorefractometer and cycloplegic retinoscopy in children.
    Akil H; Keskin S; Çavdarli C
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 26028946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of Plusoptix S12R photoscreener with cycloplegic retinoscopy and autorefraction in pediatric age group.
    Saini V; Raina UK; Gupta A; Goyal JL; Anjum R; Saini P; Gupta SK; Sharma P
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2019 Oct; 67(10):1555-1559. PubMed ID: 31546479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Automated refraction. A comparative study of automated refraction with the Nidek AR-1000 autorefractor and retinoscopy.
    Salvesen S; Køhler M
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1991 Jun; 69(3):342-6. PubMed ID: 1927317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Three-way comparison of retinoscopy, subjective, and Dioptron Nova refractive findings.
    Grosvenor T; Perrigin DM; Perrigin J
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1985 Jan; 62(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 3976838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.