These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26932872)

  • 1. Distractors associated with reward break through the focus of attention.
    Munneke J; Belopolsky AV; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2213-25. PubMed ID: 26932872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pavlovian reward learning underlies value driven attentional capture.
    Bucker B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):415-428. PubMed ID: 27905069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reward breaks through the inhibitory region around attentional focus.
    Wang L; Duan Y; Theeuwes J; Zhou X
    J Vis; 2014 Oct; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 25280985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimuli that signal the availability of reward break into attentional focus.
    Wang L; Li S; Zhou X; Theeuwes J
    Vision Res; 2018 Mar; 144():20-28. PubMed ID: 29408161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reduced attentional capture by reward following an acute dose of alcohol.
    Watson P; Pearson D; Le Pelley ME
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2020 Dec; 237(12):3625-3639. PubMed ID: 32833063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combined influence of valence and statistical learning on the control of attention: Evidence for independent sources of bias.
    Kim H; Anderson BA
    Cognition; 2021 Mar; 208():104554. PubMed ID: 33360961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Delayed disengagement of attention from distractors signalling reward.
    Watson P; Pearson D; Theeuwes J; Most SB; Le Pelley ME
    Cognition; 2020 Feb; 195():104125. PubMed ID: 31751815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Manipulating the reliability of target-color information modulates value-driven attentional capture.
    Massa NB; Crotty N; Levy I; Grubb MA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1108-1119. PubMed ID: 38538947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional capture by Pavlovian reward-signalling distractors in visual search persists when rewards are removed.
    Watson P; Pearson D; Most SB; Theeuwes J; Wiers RW; Le Pelley ME
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226284. PubMed ID: 31830126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture.
    Gronau N; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1685-95. PubMed ID: 19382007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search.
    Le Pelley ME; Ung R; Mine C; Most SB; Watson P; Pearson D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jul; 84(5):1446-1459. PubMed ID: 35013993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Motivated suppression of value- and threat-modulated attentional capture.
    Grégoire L; Britton MK; Anderson BA
    Emotion; 2022 Jun; 22(4):780-794. PubMed ID: 32628035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Capture and Control: Working Memory Modulates Attentional Capture by Reward-Related Stimuli.
    Watson P; Pearson D; Chow M; Theeuwes J; Wiers RW; Most SB; Le Pelley ME
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Aug; 30(8):1174-1185. PubMed ID: 31268837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Working memory components modulation of attentional disengagement from evaluative distractor.
    Yan M; Tian Y; Hai M; Zhang B; Chen A
    Psych J; 2024 Oct; 13(5):717-725. PubMed ID: 38530871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Brandhofer R; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1063-73. PubMed ID: 26997364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reward predictions bias attentional selection.
    Anderson BA; Laurent PA; Yantis S
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():262. PubMed ID: 23781185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Overt attentional capture by reward-related stimuli overcomes inhibitory suppression.
    Pearson D; Watson P; Cheng PX; Le Pelley ME
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 May; 46(5):489-501. PubMed ID: 32191108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tracking the location of visuospatial attention in a contingent capture paradigm.
    Leblanc E; Prime DJ; Jolicoeur P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 20(4):657-71. PubMed ID: 18052780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monetary and non-monetary rewards reduce attentional capture by emotional distractors.
    Walsh AT; Carmel D; Harper D; Bolitho P; Grimshaw GM
    Cogn Emot; 2021 Feb; 35(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 32762297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.