These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. [Microsurgical treatment of obstructive azoospermia: a report of 76 cases]. Zhang FB; Liang ZY; Li LJ; Li JP; Wu JG; Jin F; Tian YH Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2015 Mar; 21(3):239-44. PubMed ID: 25898556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vasoepididymostomy to the head of the epididymis: a comparative study of two microsurgical techniques in the rabbit. Vancaillie T; Gordts S; Boeckx W; Vasquez G; Brosens I Acta Eur Fertil; 1984; 15(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 6730862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of crossover transseptal vasoepididymostomy in treating complex obstructive azoospermia. Sabanegh E; Thomas AJ Fertil Steril; 1995 Feb; 63(2):392-5. PubMed ID: 7843448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microsurgical vaso-epididymostomy in 2 layers. Garibyan H; De Jong EA Br J Urol; 1990 Jun; 65(6):634-7. PubMed ID: 2372677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of intussusception pull-through end-to-side and conventional end-to-side microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: prospective randomized controlled study in male wistar rats. McCallum S; Li PS; Sheynkin Y; Su LM; Chan P; Goldstein M J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2284-8. PubMed ID: 11956494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patency rates of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy for patients with idiopathic obstructive azoospermia: a prospective analysis of factors associated with patency--single-center experience. Peng J; Yuan Y; Zhang Z; Gao B; Song W; Xin Z; Jin J; Liu W; Guo Y Urology; 2012 Jan; 79(1):119-22. PubMed ID: 22202547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Factors affecting the results of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy]. Peng J; Yuan YM; Zhang ZC; Gao B; Song WD; Xin ZC; Guo YL; Jin J Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Aug; 43(4):562-4. PubMed ID: 21844967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new one-layer epididymovasostomy technique. Hussein A BJU Int; 2015 Apr; 115(4):653-8. PubMed ID: 24924910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microsurgical epididymovasostomy by loop intussusception. A new technique in the rat model. Stefanović KB; Clark SA; Buncke HJ Br J Urol; 1991 Nov; 68(5):518-23. PubMed ID: 1747729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: a comparison between the end-to-side anastomosis and the invagination technique. Shekarriz M; Pomer S Urol Res; 1991; 19(5):285-7. PubMed ID: 1949427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A modified vasoepididymostomy performed with the sling and blanket technique. Marmar JL; DeBenedictis TJ; Praiss DE J Urol; 1990 Feb; 143(2):320-2. PubMed ID: 2405188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Problems unique to microsurgical epididymovasostomy. Comparison of four techniques in a laboratory rat model with review of the literature. Stefanović KB; Buncke HJ; Clark SA Int Urol Nephrol; 1993; 25(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 8365850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]