These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26934234)

  • 1. Comparison between refraction measured by Spot Vision Screening™ and subjective clinical refractometry.
    de Jesus DL; Villela FF; Orlandin LF; Eiji FN; Dantas DO; Alves MR
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2016 Feb; 71(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 26934234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical Accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 Autorefractor.
    Paudel N; Adhikari S; Thakur A; Shrestha B; Loughman J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 31107837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Subjective refractometry].
    Risse JF; Flament J
    Annee Ther Clin Ophtalmol; 1986; 37():19-40. PubMed ID: 3674817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy and accommodation capability of a handheld autorefractor.
    Wesemann W; Dick B
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2000 Jan; 26(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 10646148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of a Smartphone-based Autorefractor Compared with Criterion-standard Refraction.
    Jeganathan VSE; Valikodath N; Niziol LM; Hansen S; Apostolou H; Woodward MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Dec; 95(12):1135-1141. PubMed ID: 30451804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assesment of the QuickSee wavefront autorefractor for characterizing refractive errors in school-age children.
    Gil A; Hernández CS; Pérez-Merino P; Rubio M; Velarde G; Abellanas-Lodares M; Román-Daza Á; Alejandre N; Jiménez-Alfaro I; Casares I; Dave SR; Lim D; Lage E
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240933. PubMed ID: 33112912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retinoscopy/autorefraction: which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?
    Jorge J; Queirós A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 15630406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparisons of the handheld autorefractor, table-mounted autorefractor, and subjective refraction in Singapore adults.
    Farook M; Venkatramani J; Gazzard G; Cheng A; Tan D; Saw SM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 82(12):1066-70. PubMed ID: 16357649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of the HARK autorefractor in children.
    Isenberg SJ; Del Signore M; Madani-Becker G
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Apr; 131(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 11292405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An alternative clinical routine for subjective refraction based on power vectors with trial frames.
    María Revert A; Conversa MA; Albarrán Diego C; Micó V
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 28030877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Agreement Between Autorefraction and Subjective Refraction in Keraring-Implanted Keratoconic Eyes.
    Al-Tuwairqi WS; Ogbuehi KC; Razzouk H; Alanazi MA; Osuagwu UL
    Eye Contact Lens; 2017 Mar; 43(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 26825280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of a traditional and wavefront autorefraction.
    Lebow KA; Campbell CE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1191-8. PubMed ID: 25198541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Design and Clinical Evaluation of a Handheld Wavefront Autorefractor.
    Durr NJ; Dave SR; Vera-Diaz FA; Lim D; Dorronsoro C; Marcos S; Thorn F; Lage E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1140-7. PubMed ID: 26580271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spot Refractive Screening With or Without Maximum Atropine Cycloplegia in Preschool Chinese Children.
    Liu X; Feng J; Wang L; Tong H; Chen W
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2021; 58(3):146-153. PubMed ID: 34039157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental investigation of accommodation in eyes fit with multifocal contact lenses using a clinical auto-refractor.
    Altoaimi BH; Kollbaum P; Meyer D; Bradley A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Mar; 38(2):152-163. PubMed ID: 29315718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Population-based assessment of sensitivity and specificity of a pinhole for detection of significant refractive errors in the community.
    Marmamula S; Keeffe JE; Narsaiah S; Khanna RC; Rao GN
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Nov; 97(6):523-7. PubMed ID: 24909916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Subjective Refractometry].
    Buser A; von Livonius B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2016 Nov; 233(11):1271-1287. PubMed ID: 27855448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repeatability and validity of the PowerRefractor and the Nidek AR600-A in an adult population with healthy eyes.
    Allen PM; Radhakrishnan H; O'Leary DJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Mar; 80(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 12637836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical comparison of the Welch Allyn SureSight™ handheld autorefractor vs. streak retinoscopy in dogs.
    Groth AD; Hollingsworth SR; Ofri R; Kass PH; Reed Z; Murphy CJ
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2013 Sep; 16(5):319-23. PubMed ID: 23173899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tribal Odisha Eye Disease Study # 4: Accuracy and utility of photorefraction for refractive error correction in tribal Odisha (India) school screening.
    Reddy S; Panda L; Kumar A; Nayak S; Das T
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jul; 66(7):929-933. PubMed ID: 29941733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.