These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

713 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26934294)

  • 1. Development and Psychometric Validation of the FACE-Q Skin, Lips, and Facial Rhytids Appearance Scales and Adverse Effects Checklists for Cosmetic Procedures.
    Klassen AF; Cano SJ; Schwitzer JA; Baker SB; Carruthers A; Carruthers J; Chapas A; Pusic AL
    JAMA Dermatol; 2016 Apr; 152(4):443-51. PubMed ID: 26934294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the FACE-Q Scales for Patients Undergoing Rhinoplasty.
    Klassen AF; Cano SJ; East CA; Baker SB; Badia L; Schwitzer JA; Pusic AL
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2016; 18(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 26605889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. FACE-Q Eye Module for Measuring Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Cosmetic Eye Treatments.
    Klassen AF; Cano SJ; Grotting JC; Baker SB; Carruthers J; Carruthers A; Van Laeken N; Sykes JM; Schwitzer JA; Pusic AL
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Jan; 19(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 27631534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. FACE-Q scales for health-related quality of life, early life impact, satisfaction with outcomes, and decision to have treatment: development and validation.
    Klassen AF; Cano SJ; Schwitzer JA; Scott AM; Pusic AL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Feb; 135(2):375-386. PubMed ID: 25626785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and psychometric evaluation of the FACE-Q Aging Appraisal Scale and Patient-Perceived Age Visual Analog Scale.
    Panchapakesan V; Klassen AF; Cano SJ; Scott AM; Pusic AL
    Aesthet Surg J; 2013 Nov; 33(8):1099-109. PubMed ID: 24243890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing Improvement of Facial Appearance and Quality of Life after Minimally-Invasive Cosmetic Dermatology Procedures Using the FACE-Q Scales.
    Hibler BP; Schwitzer J; Rossi AM
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2016 Jan; 15(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 26741383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Self-Report Scales to Measure Expectations and Appearance-Related Psychosocial Distress in Patients Seeking Cosmetic Treatments.
    Klassen AF; Cano SJ; Alderman A; East C; Badia L; Baker SB; Robson S; Pusic AL
    Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Oct; 36(9):1068-78. PubMed ID: 27222106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. FACE-Q craniofacial module: Part 2 Psychometric properties of newly developed scales for children and young adults with facial conditions.
    Klassen AF; Rae C; Riff W; Denadai R; Murray DJ; Bracken S; Courtemanche DJ; Bulstrode N; O'Hara J; Butler D; Goldstein J; Tassi A; Hol ML; Johnson D; Ganske IM; Kölby L; Benitez S; Breuning EE; Malic CC; Allen GC; Pusic AL; Cano S
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Sep; 74(9):2330-2340. PubMed ID: 34172403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring outcomes that matter to face-lift patients: development and validation of FACE-Q appearance appraisal scales and adverse effects checklist for the lower face and neck.
    Klassen AF; Cano SJ; Scott AM; Pusic AL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Jan; 133(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 24105086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. FACE-Q Skin Cancer Module for measuring patient-reported outcomes following facial skin cancer surgery.
    Lee EH; Klassen AF; Cano SJ; Nehal KS; Pusic AL
    Br J Dermatol; 2018 Jul; 179(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 29654700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. FACE-Q Craniofacial Module: Part 1 validation of CLEFT-Q scales for use in children and young adults with facial conditions.
    Klassen AF; Rae C; Wong Riff KW; Bulstrode N; Denadai R; Goldstein J; Hol ML; Murray DJ; Bracken S; Courtemanche DJ; O'Hara J; Butler D; Tassi A; Malic CC; Ganske IM; Phua YS; Marucci DD; Johnson D; Swan MC; Breuning EE; Goodacre TE; Pusic AL; Cano S
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Sep; 74(9):2319-2329. PubMed ID: 34274246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and validation of a novel patient-reported treatment satisfaction measure for hyperfunctional facial lines: facial line satisfaction questionnaire.
    Pompilus F; Burgess S; Hudgens S; Banderas B; Daniels S
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2015 Dec; 14(4):274-85. PubMed ID: 26264134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and psychometric evaluation of the FACE-Q satisfaction with appearance scale: a new patient-reported outcome instrument for facial aesthetics patients.
    Pusic AL; Klassen AF; Scott AM; Cano SJ
    Clin Plast Surg; 2013 Apr; 40(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 23506765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "I Want It to Look Natural": Development and Validation of the FACE-Q Aesthetics Natural Module.
    Klassen AF; Cano S; Mansouri J; Poulsen L; Rae C; Kaur M; Dayan S; Tsangaris E; Armstrong K; Klok J; Santosa K; Pusic A
    Aesthet Surg J; 2024 Jun; 44(7):733-743. PubMed ID: 38180487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient Perceived Benefit in Facial Aesthetic Procedures: FACE-Q as a Tool to Study Botulinum Toxin Injection Outcomes.
    Chang BL; Wilson AJ; Taglienti AJ; Chang CS; Folsom N; Percec I
    Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Jul; 36(7):810-20. PubMed ID: 26780945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate treatments for acne and acne scarring: the ACNE-Q.
    Klassen AF; Lipner S; O'Malley M; Longmire NM; Cano SJ; Breitkopf T; Rae C; Zhang YL; Pusic AL
    Br J Dermatol; 2019 Dec; 181(6):1207-1215. PubMed ID: 30977918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A prospective evaluation of the efficacy of topical adhesive pads for the reduction of facial rhytids.
    Ryan WR; Most SP
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2009; 11(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 19620531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychometric findings and normative values for the CLEFT-Q based on 2434 children and young adult patients with cleft lip and/or palate from 12 countries.
    Klassen AF; Riff KWW; Longmire NM; Albert A; Allen GC; Aydin MA; Baker SB; Cano SJ; Chan AJ; Courtemanche DJ; Dreise MM; Goldstein JA; Goodacre TEE; Harman KE; Munill M; Mahony AO; Aguilera MP; Peterson P; Pusic AL; Slator R; Stiernman M; Tsangaris E; Tholpady SS; Vargas F; Forrest CR
    CMAJ; 2018 Apr; 190(15):E455-E462. PubMed ID: 29661814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychometric validation of the FACE-Q Aesthetics Satisfaction with Temples scale in individuals seeking minimally invasive treatment to improve temple hollowing.
    Kaur MN; Patel VD; Leung KX; Klassen AF
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2024 Nov; 23(11):3517-3524. PubMed ID: 39101674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An international study to develop the EAR-Q patient-reported outcome measure for children and young adults with ear conditions.
    Klassen AF; Rae C; Bulstrode NW; Berenguer B; Cui C; Fisher DM; Kasrai L; Li Y; Lloyd M; Panchapakesan V; Pusic A; Reinsch J; Stewart K; Todd A; Frank R; Tsangaris E; Wang Y; Wong Riff KW; Zhang R; Cano S
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Sep; 74(9):2341-2348. PubMed ID: 33637465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.