736 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26935133)
1. Direct comparison of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results with final histopathology in patients with proven prostate cancer in MRI/ultrasonography-fusion biopsy.
Borkowetz A; Platzek I; Toma M; Renner T; Herout R; Baunacke M; Laniado M; Baretton G; Froehner M; Zastrow S; Wirth M
BJU Int; 2016 Aug; 118(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 26935133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen.
Radtke JP; Schwab C; Wolf MB; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Kesch C; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Gasch C; Klein T; Bonekamp D; Duensing S; Roth W; Schueler S; Stock C; Schlemmer HP; Roethke M; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2016 Nov; 70(5):846-853. PubMed ID: 26810346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of Gleason 6 prostate cancer in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.
Chaloupka M; Bischoff R; Pfitzinger P; Lellig E; Ledderose S; Buchner A; Schlenker B; Stief C; Clevert DA; Apfelbeck M
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2019; 73(1):105-111. PubMed ID: 31561351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound-Fusion Biopsy Compared to Transrectal Systematic Biopsy in the Prediction of Tumour Aggressiveness in Patients with Previously Negative Biopsy.
Borkowetz A; Renner T; Platzek I; Toma M; Herout R; Baunacke M; Groeben C; Huber J; Laniado M; Baretton G; Froehner M; Zastrow S; Wirth MP
Urol Int; 2019; 102(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 30149386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Multiparametric MRI and MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy in patients with prior negative prostate biopsy].
Kesch C; Radtke JP; Distler F; Boxler S; Klein T; Hüttenbrink C; Hees K; Roth W; Roethke M; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Urologe A; 2016 Aug; 55(8):1071-7. PubMed ID: 27168038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate cancer detection on transrectal ultrasonography-guided random biopsy despite negative real-time magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided targeted biopsy: reasons for targeted biopsy failure.
Cash H; Günzel K; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Miller K; Asbach P; Haas M; Kempkensteffen C
BJU Int; 2016 Jul; 118(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 26384851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Added Value of Multiparametric Ultrasonography in Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasonography Fusion-guided Biopsy of the Prostate in Patients With Suspicion for Prostate Cancer.
Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Durmus T; Slowinski T; Cash H; Fischer T
Urology; 2015 Jul; 86(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 26142593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship Between Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Biopsy Indication, and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy Outcomes.
Meng X; Rosenkrantz AB; Mendhiratta N; Fenstermaker M; Huang R; Wysock JS; Bjurlin MA; Marshall S; Deng FM; Zhou M; Melamed J; Huang WC; Lepor H; Taneja SS
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):512-7. PubMed ID: 26112001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of free-hand transperineal mpMRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy with transperineal 12-core systematic biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a single-center prospective study in China.
Zhang Q; Wang W; Zhang B; Shi J; Fu Y; Li D; Guo S; Zhang S; Huang H; Jiang X; Zhou W; Guo H
Int Urol Nephrol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):439-448. PubMed ID: 28005230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiparametric MRI in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing repeat biopsy: a prospective comparison with clinical findings and histopathology.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Thomsen HS
Acta Radiol; 2018 Mar; 59(3):371-380. PubMed ID: 28679325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Value of MRI/ultrasound fusion in primary biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer].
Distler F; Radtke JP; Kesch C; Roethke M; Schlemmer HP; Roth W; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik B
Urologe A; 2016 Feb; 55(2):146-55. PubMed ID: 26556268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Direct comparison between Grade Group assessed on systematic and MRI/ultrasound fusion targeted biopsies correlated to the radical prostatectomy specimens in patients with prostate cancer.
Payrard-Starck C; Fourcade A; An Nguyen T; Tissot V; Doucet L; Marolleau J; Lucas C; Fournier G; Valeri A
Prog Urol; 2023 Apr; 33(5):265-271. PubMed ID: 36740508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging finding does not guarantee the absence of significant cancer among biopsy-proven prostate cancer patients: a real-life clinical experience.
Kim JJ; Byun SS; Lee SE; Lee HJ; Choe G; Hong SK
Int Urol Nephrol; 2018 Nov; 50(11):1989-1997. PubMed ID: 30229465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound-Fusion Biopsy in Patients with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Under Active Surveillance Undergoing Surveillance Biopsy.
Borkowetz A; Renner T; Platzek I; Toma M; Herout R; Baunacke M; Groeben C; Huber J; Laniado M; Baretton GB; Froehner M; Zastrow S; Wirth MP
Urol Int; 2018; 100(2):155-163. PubMed ID: 29339663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An initial negative round of targeted biopsies in men with highly suspicious multiparametric magnetic resonance findings does not exclude clinically significant prostate cancer-Preliminary experience.
Costa DN; Kay FU; Pedrosa I; Kolski L; Lotan Y; Roehrborn CG; Hornberger B; Xi Y; Francis F; Rofsky NM
Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):149.e15-149.e21. PubMed ID: 27939349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Confirmatory biopsy of men under active surveillance: extended versus saturation versus multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy.
Pepe P; Cimino S; Garufi A; Priolo G; Russo GI; Giardina R; Reale G; Pennisi M; Morgia G
Scand J Urol; 2017 Aug; 51(4):260-263. PubMed ID: 28513296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of systematic transrectal biopsy to transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Borkowetz A; Platzek I; Toma M; Laniado M; Baretton G; Froehner M; Koch R; Wirth M; Zastrow S
BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):873-9. PubMed ID: 25523210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective comparison of transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion biopsy and transrectal systematic biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients.
Borkowetz A; Hadaschik B; Platzek I; Toma M; Torsev G; Renner T; Herout R; Baunacke M; Laniado M; Baretton G; Radtke JP; Kesch C; Hohenfellner M; Froehner M; Schlemmer HP; Wirth M; Zastrow S
BJU Int; 2018 Jan; 121(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 28921850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
