These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26935504)
1. The Comparison of Four-Port, Two-Port Without Suspension Suture and Single Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Results. Sulu B; Allahverdi TD; Altun H; Koksal N Adv Clin Exp Med; 2016; 25(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 26935504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Meta-analysis of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy comparing body image and cosmesis. Haueter R; Schütz T; Raptis DA; Clavien PA; Zuber M Br J Surg; 2017 Aug; 104(9):1141-1159. PubMed ID: 28569406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and an alternative technique without a suspension suture. Sülü B; Diken T; Altun H; Anuk T; Güvendi B; İlingi E; Eren MS; Günerhan Y; Köksal N Ulus Cerrahi Derg; 2014; 30(4):192-6. PubMed ID: 25931927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy--can we afford that? Cost comparison of different surgical techniques. Matyja M; Strzałka M; Zychowicz A; Kołodziej D; Rembiasz K; Budzyński A Pol Przegl Chir; 2014 Apr; 86(4):177-80. PubMed ID: 24988232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of postoperative pain between single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective case-control study. Wong JS; Cheung YS; Fong KW; Chong CC; Lee KF; Wong J; Lai PB Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2012 Feb; 22(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 22318055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using glove port in comparison with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy SILC using glove port. Barband A; Fakhree MB; Kakaei F; Daryani A Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2012 Feb; 22(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 22318053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lai EC; Yang GP; Tang CN; Yih PC; Chan OC; Li MK Am J Surg; 2011 Sep; 202(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 21871979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety and feasibility for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in local community hospital: a retrospective comparison with conventional 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ikeda N; Ueno M; Kanamura T; Kojima Y; Nakagawa K; Ishioka K; Sasaki Y; Sho M; Sakaguchi H; Hidaka S; Ochi T; Nakajima Y Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2013 Feb; 23(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 23386147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. From multi-incision to single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy step-by-step: one surgeon's self-taught experience and retrospective analysis. Chuang SH Asian J Surg; 2013 Jan; 36(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 23270818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Poon CM; Chan KW; Lee DW; Chan KC; Ko CW; Cheung HY; Lee KW Surg Endosc; 2003 Oct; 17(10):1624-7. PubMed ID: 12874694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two-port cholecystectomy maintains safety and feasibility in benign gallbladder diseases: a comparative study. Lee SC; Choi BJ; Kim SJ Int J Surg; 2014; 12(9):1014-9. PubMed ID: 25053130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized clinical trial of single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: short-term operative outcomes. Cao ZG; Cai W; Qin MF; Zhao HZ; Yue P; Li Y Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2011 Oct; 21(5):311-3. PubMed ID: 22002264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with uncomplicated gallbladder disease: a meta-analysis. Hao L; Liu M; Zhu H; Li Z Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2012 Dec; 22(6):487-97. PubMed ID: 23238374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]