These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26936709)

  • 1. Quantifying masking in clinical mammograms via local detectability of simulated lesions.
    Mainprize JG; Alonzo-Proulx O; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1249-58. PubMed ID: 26936709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Classification of fatty and dense breast parenchyma: comparison of automatic volumetric density measurement and radiologists' classification and their inter-observer variation.
    Østerås BH; Martinsen AC; Brandal SH; Chaudhry KN; Eben E; Haakenaasen U; Falk RS; Skaane P
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Oct; 57(10):1178-85. PubMed ID: 26792823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relationship between anatomic noise and volumetric breast density for digital mammography.
    Mainprize JG; Tyson AH; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4660-8. PubMed ID: 22894390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between software volumetric breast density estimates in breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography images in a large public screening cohort.
    Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Fieselmann A; Lång K; Sartor H
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):330-336. PubMed ID: 29943180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using Volumetric Breast Density to Quantify the Potential Masking Risk of Mammographic Density.
    Destounis S; Johnston L; Highnam R; Arieno A; Morgan R; Chan A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jan; 208(1):222-227. PubMed ID: 27824483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantification of masking risk in screening mammography with volumetric breast density maps.
    Holland K; van Gils CH; Mann RM; Karssemeijer N
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Apr; 162(3):541-548. PubMed ID: 28161786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Visual Assessment of Breast Density in BI-RADS 4th and 5th Editions With Automated Volumetric Measurement.
    Youk JH; Kim SJ; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):703-708. PubMed ID: 28657850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density Using Artificial Neural Network-Based Calibration of Full-Field Digital Mammography: Feasibility on Japanese Women With and Without Breast Cancer.
    Wang J; Kato F; Yamashita H; Baba M; Cui Y; Li R; Oyama-Manabe N; Shirato H
    J Digit Imaging; 2017 Apr; 30(2):215-227. PubMed ID: 27832519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast Density Estimation with Fully Automated Volumetric Method: Comparison to Radiologists' Assessment by BI-RADS Categories.
    Singh T; Sharma M; Singla V; Khandelwal N
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 26521687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories.
    Martin KE; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Paramagul C; Blane CE; Klein KA; Sonnad SS; Chan HP
    Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):656-65. PubMed ID: 16857974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of compressed breast thickness and dose on lesion detectability in digital mammography: FROC study with simulated lesions in real mammograms.
    Salvagnini E; Bosmans H; Van Ongeval C; Van Steen A; Michielsen K; Cockmartin L; Struelens L; Marshall NW
    Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 43(9):5104. PubMed ID: 27587041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Derived mammographic masking measures based on simulated lesions predict the risk of interval cancer after controlling for known risk factors: a case-case analysis.
    Hinton B; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Malkov S; Fan B; Greenwood H; Joe B; Lee V; Strand F; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd J
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1309-1316. PubMed ID: 30697755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions.
    Nicholson BT; LoRusso AP; Smolkin M; Bovbjerg VE; Petroni GR; Harvey JA
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1143-9. PubMed ID: 16935726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigating the feasibility of stratified breast cancer screening using a masking risk predictor.
    Alonzo-Proulx O; Mainprize JG; Harvey JA; Yaffe MJ
    Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Aug; 21(1):91. PubMed ID: 31399056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiologist assessment of breast density by BI-RADS categories versus fully automated volumetric assessment.
    Gweon HM; Youk JH; Kim JA; Son EJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Sep; 201(3):692-7. PubMed ID: 23971465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. RICE: A method for quantitative mammographic image enhancement.
    Janan F; Brady M
    Med Image Anal; 2021 Jul; 71():102043. PubMed ID: 33813287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of mammographic density patterns: reproducibility and concordance among scales.
    Garrido-Estepa M; Ruiz-Perales F; Miranda J; Ascunce N; González-Román I; Sánchez-Contador C; Santamariña C; Moreo P; Vidal C; Peris M; Moreno MP; Váquez-Carrete JA; Collado-García F; Casanova F; Ederra M; Salas D; Pollán M;
    BMC Cancer; 2010 Sep; 10():485. PubMed ID: 20836850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurements in the Era of the BI-RADS Fifth Edition: A Comparison With Visual Assessment.
    Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Kim JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1056-62. PubMed ID: 26934689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of Cancer Masking in Screening Mammography Using Density and Textural Features.
    Mainprize JG; Alonzo-Proulx O; Alshafeiy TI; Patrie JT; Harvey JA; Yaffe MJ
    Acad Radiol; 2019 May; 26(5):608-619. PubMed ID: 30100155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can quantitative evaluation of mammographic breast density, "volumetric measurement", predict the masking risk with dense breast tissue? Investigation by comparison with subjective visual estimation by Japanese radiologists.
    Oiwa M; Endo T; Suda N; Morita T; Sato Y; Kawasaki T; Ichihara S
    Breast Cancer; 2019 May; 26(3):349-358. PubMed ID: 30387023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.