654 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26936728)
1. Evaluation of the influence of double and triple Gaussian proton kernel models on accuracy of dose calculations for spot scanning technique.
Hirayama S; Takayanagi T; Fujii Y; Fujimoto R; Fujitaka S; Umezawa M; Nagamine Y; Hosaka M; Yasui K; Omachi C; Toshito T
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1437-50. PubMed ID: 26936728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Commissioning dose computation models for spot scanning proton beams in water for a commercially available treatment planning system.
Zhu XR; Poenisch F; Lii M; Sawakuchi GO; Titt U; Bues M; Song X; Zhang X; Li Y; Ciangaru G; Li H; Taylor MB; Suzuki K; Mohan R; Gillin MT; Sahoo N
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041723. PubMed ID: 23556893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using field size factors to characterize the in-air fluence of a proton machine with a range shifter.
Shen J; Lentz JM; Hu Y; Liu W; Morales DH; Stoker JB; Bues M
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Mar; 12(1):52. PubMed ID: 28288673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Producing a Beam Model of the Varian ProBeam Proton Therapy System using TOPAS Monte Carlo Toolkit.
Rahman M; Bruza P; Lin Y; Gladstone DJ; Pogue BW; Zhang R
Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6500-6508. PubMed ID: 33030241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An analytical dose-averaged LET calculation algorithm considering the off-axis LET enhancement by secondary protons for spot-scanning proton therapy.
Hirayama S; Matsuura T; Ueda H; Fujii Y; Fujii T; Takao S; Miyamoto N; Shimizu S; Fujimoto R; Umegaki K; Shirato H
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3404-3416. PubMed ID: 29788552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel pencil beam model for carbon-ion dose calculation derived from Monte Carlo simulations.
Zhang H; Dai Z; Liu X; Chen W; Ma Y; He P; Dai T; Shen G; Yuan P; Li Q
Phys Med; 2018 Nov; 55():15-24. PubMed ID: 30471815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validating a double Gaussian source model for small proton fields in a commercial Monte-Carlo dose calculation engine.
Kugel F; Wulff J; Bäumer C; Janson M; Kretschmer J; Brodbek L; Behrends C; Verbeek N; Looe HK; Poppe B; Timmermann B
Z Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 33(4):529-541. PubMed ID: 36577626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An efficient method to determine double Gaussian fluence parameters in the eclipse™ proton pencil beam model.
Shen J; Liu W; Stoker J; Ding X; Anand A; Hu Y; Herman MG; Bues M
Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6544. PubMed ID: 27908162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oblique incidence for broad monoenergetic proton beams.
Jette D; Yuan J; Chen W
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5683-90. PubMed ID: 21158280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Very high-energy electron dose calculation using the Fermi-Eyges theory of multiple scattering and a simplified pencil beam model.
Ronga MG; Deut U; Bonfrate A; De Marzi L
Med Phys; 2023 Dec; 50(12):8009-8022. PubMed ID: 37730956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A pencil beam algorithm for magnetic resonance image-guided proton therapy.
Padilla-Cabal F; Georg D; Fuchs H
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2195-2204. PubMed ID: 29532490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial proton spot scanning Monte-Carlo dose algorithm: comparisons against measurements and simulations.
Saini J; Maes D; Egan A; Bowen SR; St James S; Janson M; Wong T; Bloch C
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7659-7681. PubMed ID: 28749373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurements of lateral penumbra for uniform scanning proton beams under various beam delivery conditions and comparison to the XiO treatment planning system.
Rana S; Zeidan O; Ramirez E; Rains M; Gao J; Zheng Y
Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 40(9):091708. PubMed ID: 24007141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A generalized 2D pencil beam scaling algorithm for proton dose calculation in heterogeneous slab geometries.
Westerly DC; Mo X; Tomé WA; Mackie TR; DeLuca PM
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061706. PubMed ID: 23718585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantifying the effect of air gap, depth, and range shifter thickness on TPS dosimetric accuracy in superficial PBS proton therapy.
Shirey RJ; Wu HT
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):164-173. PubMed ID: 29239528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benchmarking a GATE/Geant4 Monte Carlo model for proton beams in magnetic fields.
Padilla-Cabal F; Alejandro Fragoso J; Franz Resch A; Georg D; Fuchs H
Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 31661559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determination of the initial beam parameters in Monte Carlo linac simulation.
Aljarrah K; Sharp GC; Neicu T; Jiang SB
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):850-8. PubMed ID: 16696460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimental verification of dose calculation using the simplified Monte Carlo method with an improved initial beam model for a beam-wobbling system.
Tansho R; Takada Y; Kohno R; Hotta K; Hara Y; Mizutani S; Akimoto T
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(17):6047-64. PubMed ID: 23939011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the parametrization of lateral dose profiles in proton radiation therapy.
Bellinzona VE; Ciocca M; Embriaco A; Fontana A; Mairani A; Mori M; Parodi K
Phys Med; 2015 Jul; 31(5):484-92. PubMed ID: 26032003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A benchmarking method to evaluate the accuracy of a commercial proton monte carlo pencil beam scanning treatment planning system.
Lin L; Huang S; Kang M; Hiltunen P; Vanderstraeten R; Lindberg J; Siljamaki S; Wareing T; Davis I; Barnett A; McGhee J; Simone CB; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Ainsley C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):44-49. PubMed ID: 28300385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
