182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26936768)
1. An investigation of the relation between tumor-to-liver ratio (TLR) and tumor-to-blood standard uptake ratio (SUR) in oncological FDG PET.
Hofheinz F; Bütof R; Apostolova I; Zöphel K; Steffen IG; Amthauer H; Kotzerke J; Baumann M; van den Hoff J
EJNMMI Res; 2016 Dec; 6(1):19. PubMed ID: 26936768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of SUV, tumor-to-blood standard uptake ratio (SUR), and dual time point measurements for assessment of the metabolic uptake rate in FDG PET.
Hofheinz F; Hoff Jv; Steffen IG; Lougovski A; Ego K; Amthauer H; Apostolova I
EJNMMI Res; 2016 Dec; 6(1):53. PubMed ID: 27334609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic Value of Pretherapeutic Tumor-to-Blood Standardized Uptake Ratio in Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma.
Bütof R; Hofheinz F; Zöphel K; Stadelmann T; Schmollack J; Jentsch C; Löck S; Kotzerke J; Baumann M; van den Hoff J
J Nucl Med; 2015 Aug; 56(8):1150-6. PubMed ID: 26089549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Test-Retest Variability in Lesion SUV and Lesion SUR in
Hofheinz F; Apostolova I; Oehme L; Kotzerke J; van den Hoff J
J Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 58(11):1770-1775. PubMed ID: 28473598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Confirmation of the prognostic value of pretherapeutic tumor SUR and MTV in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Hofheinz F; Li Y; Steffen IG; Lin Q; Lili C; Hua W; van den Hoff J; Zschaeck S
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jul; 46(7):1485-1494. PubMed ID: 30949816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The PET-derived tumor-to-blood standard uptake ratio (SUR) is superior to tumor SUV as a surrogate parameter of the metabolic rate of FDG.
van den Hoff J; Oehme L; Schramm G; Maus J; Lougovski A; Petr J; Beuthien-Baumann B; Hofheinz F
EJNMMI Res; 2013 Nov; 3(1):77. PubMed ID: 24267032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interobserver variability of image-derived arterial blood SUV in whole-body FDG PET.
Hofheinz F; Maus J; Zschaeck S; Rogasch J; Schramm G; Oehme L; Apostolova I; Kotzerke J; den Hoff JV
EJNMMI Res; 2019 Mar; 9(1):23. PubMed ID: 30830508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic value of SUR in patients with trimodality treatment of locally advanced esophageal carcinoma.
Bütof R; Hofheinz F; Zöphel K; Schmollack J; Jentsch C; Zschaeck S; Kotzerke J; van den Hoff J; Baumann M
J Nucl Med; 2018 Aug; 60(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 30166358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correction of scan time dependence of standard uptake values in oncological PET.
van den Hoff J; Lougovski A; Schramm G; Maus J; Oehme L; Petr J; Beuthien-Baumann B; Kotzerke J; Hofheinz F
EJNMMI Res; 2014 Apr; 4(1):18. PubMed ID: 24693879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A convolutional neural network for fully automated blood SUV determination to facilitate SUR computation in oncological FDG-PET.
Nikulin P; Hofheinz F; Maus J; Li Y; Bütof R; Lange C; Furth C; Zschaeck S; Kreissl MC; Kotzerke J; van den Hoff J
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Apr; 48(4):995-1004. PubMed ID: 33006022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden from (18)F-FDG PET in surgical patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
Zhang H; Wroblewski K; Liao S; Kampalath R; Penney BC; Zhang Y; Pu Y
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jan; 20(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 22999369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation of simultaneously acquired diffusion-weighted imaging and 2-deoxy-[18F] fluoro-2-D-glucose positron emission tomography of pulmonary lesions in a dedicated whole-body magnetic resonance/positron emission tomography system.
Schmidt H; Brendle C; Schraml C; Martirosian P; Bezrukov I; Hetzel J; Müller M; Sauter A; Claussen CD; Pfannenberg C; Schwenzer NF
Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):247-55. PubMed ID: 23519008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tumor to cervical spinal cord standardized uptake ratio (SUR) improves the reproducibility of
van den Bosch S; Dijkema T; Philippens MEP; Terhaard CHJ; Hoebers FJP; Kaanders JHAM; Oyen WJG
Radiother Oncol; 2019 Jan; 130():39-45. PubMed ID: 30005954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Elevated tumor-to-liver uptake ratio (TLR) from
Huang J; Huang L; Zhou J; Duan Y; Zhang Z; Wang X; Huang P; Tan S; Hu P; Wang J; Huang M
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Nov; 44(12):1958-1968. PubMed ID: 28812134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tissue standardized uptake value is a closer surrogate of blood fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose clearance after division by blood standardized uptake value, illustrated in brain and liver.
Keramida G; Peters AM
Nucl Med Commun; 2019 May; 40(5):552-554. PubMed ID: 30973842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of prone versus supine 18F-FDG-PET of locally advanced breast cancer: Phantom and preliminary clinical studies.
Williams JM; Rani SD; Li X; Arlinghaus LR; Lee TC; MacDonald LR; Partridge SC; Kang H; Whisenant JG; Abramson RG; Linden HM; Kinahan PE; Yankeelov TE
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3801-13. PubMed ID: 26133582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improvement of hepatic lesion characterization by 18F-FDG PET/CT with the use of the lesion to background liver activity ratio.
Jolepalem P; Rydberg JN; Wong CO
Clin Nucl Med; 2013 Nov; 38(11):869-73. PubMed ID: 24089057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adrenal-to-liver SUV ratio is the best parameter for differentiation of adrenal metastases from adenomas using 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Watanabe H; Kanematsu M; Goshima S; Kondo H; Kawada H; Noda Y; Moriyama N
Ann Nucl Med; 2013 Aug; 27(7):648-53. PubMed ID: 23625579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation between standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient of neoplastic lesions evaluated with whole-body simultaneous hybrid PET/MRI.
Rakheja R; Chandarana H; DeMello L; Jackson K; Geppert C; Faul D; Glielmi C; Friedman KP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1115-9. PubMed ID: 24147485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
