These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
427 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26936884)
1. Closed oocyte vitrification and storage in an oocyte donation programme: obstetric and neonatal outcome. De Munck N; Belva F; Van de Velde H; Verheyen G; Stoop D Hum Reprod; 2016 May; 31(5):1024-33. PubMed ID: 26936884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Open versus closed oocyte vitrification in an oocyte donation programme: a prospective randomized sibling oocyte study. De Munck N; Santos-Ribeiro S; Stoop D; Van de Velde H; Verheyen G Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 26724798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How does vitrification affect oocyte viability in oocyte donation cycles? A prospective study to compare outcomes achieved with fresh versus vitrified sibling oocytes. Solé M; Santaló J; Boada M; Clua E; Rodríguez I; Martínez F; Coroleu B; Barri PN; Veiga A Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2087-92. PubMed ID: 23744895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficiency and efficacy of vitrification in 35 654 sibling oocytes from donation cycles. Cornet-Bartolomé D; Rodriguez A; García D; Barragán M; Vassena R Hum Reprod; 2020 Oct; 35(10):2262-2271. PubMed ID: 32856058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Definition of a clinical strategy to enhance the efficacy, efficiency and safety of egg donation cycles with imported vitrified oocytes. Rienzi L; Cimadomo D; Maggiulli R; Vaiarelli A; Dusi L; Buffo L; Amendola MG; Colamaria S; Giuliani M; Bruno G; Stoppa M; Ubaldi FM Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 35(4):785-795. PubMed ID: 32240287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified early cleavage embryos. Liu SY; Teng B; Fu J; Li X; Zheng Y; Sun XX Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2093-100. PubMed ID: 23569081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of two different oocyte vitrification methods: a prospective, paired study on the same genetic background and stimulation protocol. Pujol A; Zamora MJ; Obradors A; Garcia D; Rodriguez A; Vassena R Hum Reprod; 2019 Jun; 34(6):989-997. PubMed ID: 31116386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neonatal health including congenital malformation risk of 1072 children born after vitrified embryo transfer. Belva F; Bonduelle M; Roelants M; Verheyen G; Van Landuyt L Hum Reprod; 2016 Jul; 31(7):1610-20. PubMed ID: 27165622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Should we worry about the clock? Relationship between time to ICSI and reproductive outcomes in cycles with fresh and vitrified oocytes. Bárcena P; Rodríguez M; Obradors A; Vernaeve V; Vassena R Hum Reprod; 2016 Jun; 31(6):1182-91. PubMed ID: 27076502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical validation of a closed vitrification system in an oocyte-donation programme. Stoop D; De Munck N; Jansen E; Platteau P; Van den Abbeel E; Verheyen G; Devroey P Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Feb; 24(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 22222248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Health of 2-year-old children born after vitrified oocyte donation in comparison with peers born after fresh oocyte donation. Van Reckem M; Blockeel C; Bonduelle M; Buysse A; Roelants M; Verheyen G; Tournaye H; Hes F; Belva F Hum Reprod Open; 2021; 2021(1):hoab002. PubMed ID: 33634217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical outcomes of a vitrified donor oocyte programme: A single UK centre experience. Seshadri S; Saab W; Exeter H; Drew E; Petrie A; Davies M; Serhal P Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Jun; 225():136-140. PubMed ID: 29709727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Effects of cryopreservation time and thawing method of human oocyte vitrification on the outcome of assisted reproduction]. Song WY; Sun YP; Jin HX; Xin ZM; Su YC; Guo YH; Chen ZJ Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Aug; 45(8):578-82. PubMed ID: 21029612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endometrial preparation: effect of estrogen dose and administration route on reproductive outcomes in oocyte donation cycles with fresh embryo transfer. Madero S; Rodriguez A; Vassena R; Vernaeve V Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1755-64. PubMed ID: 27141040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study. Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval. Doyle JO; Richter KS; Lim J; Stillman RJ; Graham JR; Tucker MJ Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):459-66.e2. PubMed ID: 26604065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Freeze-all, oocyte vitrification, or fresh embryo transfer? Lessons from an egg-sharing donation program. Braga DP; Setti AS; Figueira RC; Azevedo Mde C; Iaconelli A; Lo Turco EG; Borges E Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):615-22. PubMed ID: 27262501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Closed vs. Open Oocyte Vitrification Methods Are Equally Effective for Blastocyst Embryo Transfers: Prospective Study from a Sibling Oocyte Donation Program. Gullo G; Petousis S; Papatheodorou A; Panagiotidis Y; Margioula-Siarkou C; Prapas N; D'Anna R; Perino A; Cucinella G; Prapas Y Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2020; 85(2):206-212. PubMed ID: 32182615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Egg donation of vitrified oocytes bank produces similar pregnancy rates by blastocyst transfer when compared to fresh cycle. Domingues TS; Aquino AP; Barros B; Mazetto R; Nicolielo M; Kimati CM; Devecchi T; Bonetti TCS; Serafini PC; Motta ELA J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Nov; 34(11):1553-1557. PubMed ID: 28815355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Obstetric and neonatal outcome of ART in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: IVM of oocytes versus controlled ovarian stimulation. Mostinckx L; Segers I; Belva F; Buyl R; Santos-Ribeiro S; Blockeel C; Smitz J; Anckaert E; Tournaye H; De Vos M Hum Reprod; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1595-1607. PubMed ID: 31347678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]