141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26937929)
21. Load transfer in Christensen(®) TMJ in alloplastic total joint replacement for two different mouth apertures.
Ramos A; Mesnard M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1442-9. PubMed ID: 24954763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biomechanical comparative analysis of temporomandibular joint, glenoid fossa and head of the condyle of conventional models prothesis with new PEEK design.
Genovesi W; Comenale IC; Genovesi Filho W; Veloso Fernandes M
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2022; 12(5):529-541. PubMed ID: 35859613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Simultaneous treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis with severe mandibular deficiency by standard TMJ prosthesis.
Hu Y; Zhang L; He D; Yang C; Chen M; Zhang S; Li H; Ellis E
Sci Rep; 2017 Mar; 7():45271. PubMed ID: 28337986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Morphology of the temporomandibular joint in subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusions.
Katsavrias EG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):470-8. PubMed ID: 16627172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of temporomandibular joint prostheses: review of the literature from 1946 to 1994 and implications for future prosthesis designs.
van Loon JP; de Bont GM; Boering G
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1995 Sep; 53(9):984-96; discussion 996-7. PubMed ID: 7643290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. One-Stage Treatment of Giant Condylar Osteoma: Alloplastic Total Temporomandibular Joint Replacement Aided by Digital Templates.
Xu X; Ma H; Jin S
J Craniofac Surg; 2018 May; 29(3):636-639. PubMed ID: 29077682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Airway space changes after maxillomandibular counterclockwise rotation and mandibular advancement with TMJ Concepts® total joint prostheses: three-dimensional assessment.
Gonçalves JR; Gomes LC; Vianna AP; Rodrigues DB; Gonçalves DA; Wolford LM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Aug; 42(8):1014-22. PubMed ID: 23726273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Three-dimensional evaluation of TMJ parameters in Class II and Class III patients.
Krisjane Z; Urtane I; Krumina G; Zepa K
Stomatologija; 2009; 11(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 19423969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Preliminary clinical study of Chinese standard alloplastic temporomandibular joint prosthesis.
Zou L; Zhao J; He D
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Apr; 47(4):602-606. PubMed ID: 30777737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Review of emerging temporomandibular joint total joint replacement systems.
Elledge R; Mercuri LG; Attard A; Green J; Speculand B
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 57(8):722-728. PubMed ID: 31455594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Relationships between geometry and kinematic characteristics in the temporomandibular joint.
Mesnard M; Coutant JC; Aoun M; Morlier J; Cid M; Caix P
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2012; 15(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 21264781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Adaptability of stock TMJ prosthesis to joints that were previously treated with custom joint prosthesis.
Abramowicz S; Barbick M; Rose SP; Dolwick MF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 41(4):518-20. PubMed ID: 22169167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Traumatic temporomandibular joint ankylosis: our classification and treatment experience.
He D; Yang C; Chen M; Zhang X; Qiu Y; Yang X; Li L; Fang B
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jun; 69(6):1600-7. PubMed ID: 21295900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Improved Visualization and Assessment of Condylar Position in the Glenoid Fossa for Different Occlusions: A CBCT Study.
Kaur A; Natt AS; Mehra SK; Maheshwari K; Singh G; Kaur A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Aug; 17(8):679-86. PubMed ID: 27659088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Temporomandibular custom hemijoint replacement prosthesis: prospective clinical and kinematic study.
Keller EE; Baltali E; Liang X; Zhao K; Huebner M; An KN
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):276-88. PubMed ID: 21856060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Changes in temporomandibular joint morphology in class II patients treated with fixed mandibular repositioning and evaluated through 3D imaging: a systematic review.
Al-Saleh MA; Alsufyani N; Flores-Mir C; Nebbe B; Major PW
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Nov; 18(4):185-201. PubMed ID: 26260422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cluster analysis as a method for determining size ranges for spinal implants: disc lumbar replacement prosthesis dimensions from magnetic resonance images.
Lei D; Holder RL; Smith FW; Wardlaw D; Hukins DW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(25):2979-83; discussion 2984. PubMed ID: 17139231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of the usefulness of the limited cone-beam CT (3DX) in the assessment of the thickness of the roof of the glenoid fossa of the temporomandibular joint.
Honda K; Arai Y; Kashima M; Takano Y; Sawada K; Ejima K; Iwai K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Nov; 33(6):391-5. PubMed ID: 15665233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The theoretical optimal center of rotation for a temporomandibular joint prosthesis: a three-dimensional kinematic study.
van Loon JP; Falkenström CH; de Bont LG; Verkerke GJ; Stegenga B
J Dent Res; 1999 Jan; 78(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 10065944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Biomechanical evaluation of Chinese customized three-dimensionally printed total temporomandibular joint prostheses: A finite element analysis.
Chen X; Wang Y; Mao Y; Zhou Z; Zheng J; Zhen J; Qiu Y; Zhang S; Qin H; Yang C
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 46(9):1561-1568. PubMed ID: 30025603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
