These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26937972)
1. The Effect of Attentional Cueing and Spatial Uncertainty in Visual Field Testing. Phu J; Kalloniatis M; Khuu SK PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150922. PubMed ID: 26937972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reducing Spatial Uncertainty Through Attentional Cueing Improves Contrast Sensitivity in Regions of the Visual Field With Glaucomatous Defects. Phu J; Kalloniatis M; Khuu SK Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2018 Mar; 7(2):8. PubMed ID: 29600116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spatial summation across the central visual field: implications for visual field testing. Khuu SK; Kalloniatis M J Vis; 2015 Jan; 15(1):15.1.6. PubMed ID: 25583876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Equating spatial summation in visual field testing reveals greater loss in optic nerve disease. Kalloniatis M; Khuu SK Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Jul; 36(4):439-52. PubMed ID: 27197562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Standard Automated Perimetry: Determining Spatial Summation and Its Effect on Contrast Sensitivity Across the Visual Field. Khuu SK; Kalloniatis M Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Jun; 56(6):3565-76. PubMed ID: 26047043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pattern Recognition Analysis Reveals Unique Contrast Sensitivity Isocontours Using Static Perimetry Thresholds Across the Visual Field. Phu J; Khuu SK; Nivison-Smith L; Zangerl B; Choi AYJ; Jones BW; Pfeiffer RL; Marc RE; Kalloniatis M Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Sep; 58(11):4863-4876. PubMed ID: 28973333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Involuntary cueing effects on accuracy measures: Stimulus and task dependence. Kerzel D; Zarian L; Souto D J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):16.1-16. PubMed ID: 20053079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of Goldmann III, V and spatially equated test stimuli in visual field testing: the importance of complete and partial spatial summation. Phu J; Khuu SK; Zangerl B; Kalloniatis M Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Mar; 37(2):160-176. PubMed ID: 28211185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The physics and psychophysics of microperimetry. Seiple W; Rosen RB; Castro-Lima V; Garcia PM Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Aug; 89(8):1182-91. PubMed ID: 22820474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Expectancy effects on spatial frequency processing. Sowden PT; Ozgen E; Schyns PG; Daoutis C Vision Res; 2003 Dec; 43(26):2759-72. PubMed ID: 14568093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rethinking human visual attention: spatial cueing effects and optimality of decisions by honeybees, monkeys and humans. Eckstein MP; Mack SC; Liston DB; Bogush L; Menzel R; Krauzlis RJ Vision Res; 2013 Jun; 85():5-19. PubMed ID: 23298793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli. Wall M; Kutzko KE; Chauhan BC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):426-35. PubMed ID: 9040476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect. Xu B; Tanaka JW Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 25190323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving residual vision by attentional cueing in patients with brain lesions. Poggel DA; Kasten E; Müller-Oehring EM; Bunzenthal U; Sabel BA Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 16777076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: support for signal enhancement. Carrasco M; Penpeci-Talgar C; Eckstein M Vision Res; 2000; 40(10-12):1203-15. PubMed ID: 10788636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determining Spatial Summation and Its Effect on Contrast Sensitivity across the Central 20 Degrees of Visual Field. Choi AY; Nivison-Smith L; Khuu SK; Kalloniatis M PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158263. PubMed ID: 27384954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scaling the size of perimetric stimuli reduces variability and returns constant thresholds across the visual field. Bedggood P; Prea SM; Kong YXG; Vingrys AJ J Vis; 2021 Oct; 21(11):2. PubMed ID: 34617957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of central and peripheral cueing on perceptual and saccade performance. Moehler T; Fiehler K Vision Res; 2018 Feb; 143():26-33. PubMed ID: 29262304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanisms mediating visual detection in static perimetry. Harwerth RS; Smith EL; DeSantis L Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Sep; 34(10):3011-23. PubMed ID: 8360032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Classification images of two right hemisphere patients: a window into the attentional mechanisms of spatial neglect. Shimozaki S; Kingstone A; Olk B; Stowe R; Eckstein M Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1080(1):26-52. PubMed ID: 16497281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]