These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26939499)

  • 1. MYRIAD VOICES AGAINST GENE PATENTS IN THE HIGH COURT.
    McCallum L; Faunce T
    J Law Med; 2015 Dec; 23(2):322-9. PubMed ID: 26939499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Some Legal Issues Regarding the Patenting of Human Genetic Materials.
    MacFarlane P; Kontoleon B
    J Law Med; 2016; 24(1):181-202. PubMed ID: 30136781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patenting Nucleic Acid Sequences: More Ambiguity from the High Court?
    Lawson C
    J Law Med; 2018 Apr; 25(3):741-764. PubMed ID: 29978665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Take off your genes and let the doctor have a look: why the Mayo and Myriad decisions have invalidated method claims for genetic diagnostic testing.
    Bergin C
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2013; 63(1):173-217. PubMed ID: 25335200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gene patents and personalized cancer care: impact of the Myriad case on clinical oncology.
    Offit K; Bradbury A; Storm C; Merz JF; Noonan KE; Spence R
    J Clin Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(21):2743-8. PubMed ID: 23766521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some Legal Issues Regarding the Patenting of Human Genetic Materials.
    MacFarlane P; Kontoleon B
    J Law Med; 2016; 24(1):181-202. PubMed ID: 30136782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The History of Patenting Genetic Material.
    Sherkow JS; Greely HT
    Annu Rev Genet; 2015; 49():161-82. PubMed ID: 26442843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Grant v Commissioner of Patents and patenting knowledge inventions.
    Lawson C
    J Law Med; 2008 Feb; 15(4):626-43. PubMed ID: 18365526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gene patents, patenting life and the impact of court rulings on US stem cell patents and research.
    Matthews KR; Cuchiara ML
    Regen Med; 2014 Mar; 9(2):191-200. PubMed ID: 24750060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hippocratic obligation to shareholder profit? Medical treatment patents and the Australian High Court in Apotex Pty Ltd v Sanofi-Aventis Australia Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 50.
    Vines T
    J Law Med; 2014 Jun; 21(4):797-809. PubMed ID: 25087362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patents, genomics, research, and diagnostics.
    Barton JH
    Acad Med; 2002 Dec; 77(12 Pt 2):1339-47. PubMed ID: 12480644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Harvard v. Canada: the myc mouse that still squeaks in the maze of biopatent law.
    Deftos LJ
    Acad Med; 2001 Jul; 76(7):684-92. PubMed ID: 11448821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Federal Circuit's decision in Myriad: isolated DNA molecules are patentable subject matter.
    Ogden SR
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2011; 61(2):443-56. PubMed ID: 25335196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New forms of evergreening in Australia: misleading advertising, enantiomers and data exclusivity: Apotex v Servier and Alphapharm v Lundbeck.
    Faunce T; Vines T; Gibbons H
    J Law Med; 2008 Oct; 16(2):220-32. PubMed ID: 19010001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patenting human genes: Chinese academic articles' portrayal of gene patents.
    Du L
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Apr; 19(1):29. PubMed ID: 29699570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Supreme Court to Myriad Genetics: Synthetic DNA is Patentable but Isolated Genes Are Not.
    Weinmeyer R; Klusty T
    AMA J Ethics; 2015 Sep; 17(9):849-53. PubMed ID: 26390207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strategies for strengthening patent protection of pharmaceutical inventions in light of federal court decisions.
    Pillai X; Kinney WA
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2010; 10(18):1929-36. PubMed ID: 20615184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of Myriad and Mayo: will advancements in the biological sciences be spurred or disincentivized? (Or was biotech patenting not complicated enough?).
    Gordon J
    Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med; 2014 Dec; 5(5):a020917. PubMed ID: 25502748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A brief guide to understanding patentability and the meaning of patents.
    Elliott GC
    Acad Med; 2002 Dec; 77(12 Pt 2):1309-14. PubMed ID: 12480641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. International Divergence in Gene Patenting.
    Nicol D; Dreyfuss RC; Gold ER; Li W; Liddicoat J; Van Overwalle G
    Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet; 2019 Aug; 20():519-541. PubMed ID: 30786226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.