These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26940029)

  • 1. No difference in cross-modal attention or sensory discrimination thresholds in autism and matched controls.
    Haigh SM; Heeger DJ; Heller LM; Gupta A; Dinstein I; Minshew NJ; Behrmann M
    Vision Res; 2016 Apr; 121():85-94. PubMed ID: 26940029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cross-modal attention influences auditory contrast sensitivity: Decreasing visual load improves auditory thresholds for amplitude- and frequency-modulated sounds.
    Ciaramitaro VM; Chow HM; Eglington LG
    J Vis; 2017 Mar; 17(3):20. PubMed ID: 28355632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cross-modal interactions between audition, touch, and vision in endogenous spatial attention: ERP evidence on preparatory states and sensory modulations.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Feb; 14(2):254-71. PubMed ID: 11970790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modality-specific selective attention attenuates multisensory integration.
    Mozolic JL; Hugenschmidt CE; Peiffer AM; Laurienti PJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 184(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 17684735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An event-related FMRI study of exogenous orienting across vision and audition.
    Yang Z; Mayer AR
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Mar; 35(3):964-74. PubMed ID: 23288620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Crossmodal coupling of oculomotor control and spatial attention in vision and audition.
    Rolfs M; Engbert R; Kliegl R
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):427-39. PubMed ID: 16032403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sound-aided recovery from and persistence against visual filling-in.
    Sheth BR; Shimojo S
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(16):1907-17. PubMed ID: 15145684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic selective attention as a function of sensory modality in aging.
    Guerreiro MJ; Adam JJ; Van Gerven PW
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2012 Mar; 67(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 21798856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Region-specific modulations in oscillatory alpha activity serve to facilitate processing in the visual and auditory modalities.
    Mazaheri A; van Schouwenburg MR; Dimitrijevic A; Denys D; Cools R; Jensen O
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 87():356-62. PubMed ID: 24188814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Timing flickers across sensory modalities.
    Vicario CM; Rappo G; Pepi AM; Oliveri M
    Perception; 2009; 38(8):1144-51. PubMed ID: 19817148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modality-specificity of sensory aging in vision and audition: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Ceponiene R; Westerfield M; Torki M; Townsend J
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():53-68. PubMed ID: 18482717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems.
    Turatto M; Galfano G; Bridgeman B; Umiltà C
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Apr; 155(3):301-10. PubMed ID: 14658019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ERP effects of intermodal attention and cross-modal links in spatial attention.
    Eimer M; Schröger E
    Psychophysiology; 1998 May; 35(3):313-27. PubMed ID: 9564751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cross-modal deactivations during modality-specific selective attention.
    Mozolic JL; Joyner D; Hugenschmidt CE; Peiffer AM; Kraft RA; Maldjian JA; Laurienti PJ
    BMC Neurol; 2008 Sep; 8():35. PubMed ID: 18817554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feature-based attention elicited by precueing in an orientation discrimination task.
    Huang D; Xue L; Wang M; Hu Q; Bu X; Chen Y
    Vision Res; 2018 Jul; 148():15-25. PubMed ID: 29763696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peripheral visual localization is degraded by globally incongruent auditory-spatial attention cues.
    Ahveninen J; Ingalls G; Yildirim F; Calabro FJ; Vaina LM
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Sep; 237(9):2137-2143. PubMed ID: 31201472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.