These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26940215)

  • 1. Reply to the Letter to the Editor by Sollini M et al.
    Pacini F; Elisei R; Fugazzola L; Ferdeghini M; Mariotti S; Pellegriti G
    J Endocrinol Invest; 2016 Apr; 39(4):487-8. PubMed ID: 26940215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reply to A. Piccardo et al, E. Hindié et al, M.C. Kreissl et al, M. Doss, J. Buscombe, R. Fisher, M. Sollini et al, M. Lichtenstein, and M. Tulchinsky et al.
    Molenaar RJ; Sidana S; Radivoyevitch T; Gerds AT; Carraway HE; Kalaycio M; Nazha A; Adelstein DJ; Nasr C; Maciejewski JP; Majhail NS; Sekeres MA; Mukherjee S
    J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jun; 36(18):1889-1892. PubMed ID: 29723096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reply to C. Ferreira-Pêgo's Letter to the Editor Re: Nissensohn M. et al.; Nutrients 2016, 8, 232.
    Nissensohn M; Serra-Majem L
    Nutrients; 2016 Nov; 8(11):. PubMed ID: 27827922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reviewer's comment to Letter to the Editor of Jingming Lin et al. concerning "Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis" (by W. Ding et al. (2014) Eur Spine J 23(2):395-403): and authors' reply of Wenbin Ding et al.
    Edwards K
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Oct; 24(10):2357. PubMed ID: 26206291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reply to M.V. Meng's Letter to the Editor re: H. Baumert et al. The use of polymer (Hem-o-lok) clips for management of the renal hilum during laparoscopic nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2006;49:816-9 and P.L. Steinberg et al. re: H. Baumert et al. The use of polymer (Hem-o-lok) clips for management of the renal hilum during laparoscopic nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2006;49:816-9. Eur Urol 2007;51:572-3.
    O'Kane HF; Nambirajan T
    Eur Urol; 2007 May; 51(5):1449. PubMed ID: 17229516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In reply to letter to the editor by Dr Willems et al. re: Eccles et al. Change in diffusion weighted MRI during liver cancer radiotherapy: Preliminary observations.
    Eccles C; Haider MA; Dawson LA
    Acta Oncol; 2010; 49(2):256-7. PubMed ID: 20017663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Reply to the letter to the editor by Retuerto Griessner M. et al.].
    Martín-Calvo N; Martínez-González MÁ
    Aten Primaria; 2021 Nov; 53(9):102148. PubMed ID: 34293447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reply to Letter to the Editor regarding article by Miranda et al.
    Morrison SD; Liu Y; Said HK
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Mar; 70(3):427-428. PubMed ID: 28089861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reply to: Letter to the Editor: Re Srinivasa et al., International Journal of Surgery 2014.
    Srinivasa S; Taylor MH; Hill AG
    Int J Surg; 2016 May; 29():187-8. PubMed ID: 26537312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reply to Letter to the Editor by Crocoli A, et al.
    Kaji T
    J Pediatr Surg; 2017 Sep; 52(9):1537. PubMed ID: 28648879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reply to the Letter to the Editor by Mueller et al.
    Pascale A; Beal M
    Womens Health Issues; 2016; 26(4):478. PubMed ID: 27448752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reply to the letter to editor by Gaye et al.
    Manczuk M; Vaidean G
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Jul; 239():31-32. PubMed ID: 28560977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reply to letter to the editor titled "a questionable conclusion by Ido Stahl et al.".
    Stahl I; Haddad E; Hous N; Dreyfuss D
    Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):1058-1059. PubMed ID: 28625803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reply to "Letter to Editor, in response to Narain et al.".
    Singh K
    Spine J; 2017 Nov; 17(11):1767. PubMed ID: 29150263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reply to Letter to the Editor by R.L. Jump et al.
    Zarowitz BJ; Allen C; Tangalos E; Ouslander JG
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2016 Aug; 17(8):755. PubMed ID: 27378273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reply to the Letter to the Editor by Mori et al.
    Nishiguchi S; Yamada M; Shirooka H; Nozaki Y; Fukutani N; Tashiro Y; Hirata H; Yamaguchi M; Tasaka S; Matsushita T; Matsubara K; Tsuboyama T; Aoyama T
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2016 Jun; 17(6):560-1. PubMed ID: 27143235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response to the letter to the editor Reply to Restolho et al. "Contactless decontamination of hair samples: cannabinoids" by Moosmann and Auwärter.
    Restolho J; Barroso M; Saramago B; Dias M; Afonso CA
    Drug Test Anal; 2017 Feb; 9(2):290-292. PubMed ID: 28035756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reply to the Letter to the Editor by Hendriks et al.
    Eberhardt WE; Mitchell A; Rami-Porta R
    J Thorac Oncol; 2016 Mar; 11(3):e43-4. PubMed ID: 26922925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reply to the letter to the editor by Guinn et al.
    Karban J; Mocikova H; Pytlik R; Klener P; Trneny M
    Eur J Haematol; 2011 Nov; 87(5):470. PubMed ID: 21883479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Letter to the editor: In reply to Sansone et al.
    Langer T; Pechmann A; Wider S; Kirschner J
    Eur J Paediatr Neurol; 2018 Jul; 22(4):732. PubMed ID: 29628153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.