119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26941129)
1. Implementing the extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study (EOGRTS): important points to consider.
Beekhuijzen M; Barentsen H; Marsden E; Zmarowski A; Aujoulat M; Picut C; Sloter E
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2016; 46(4):332-47. PubMed ID: 26941129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Regulatory acceptance and use of the Extended One Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study within Europe.
Schiffelers MJ; Blaauboer BJ; Bakker WE; Hendriksen CF; Krul C
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Feb; 71(1):114-24. PubMed ID: 25445002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Guidance on the selection of cohorts for the extended one-generation reproduction toxicity study (OECD test guideline 443).
Moore NP; Beekhuijzen M; Boogaard PJ; Foreman JE; North CM; Palermo C; Schneider S; Strauss V; van Ravenzwaay B; Poole A
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Oct; 80():32-40. PubMed ID: 27245879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitivity of different generations and developmental stages in studies on reproductive toxicity.
Schulz F; Batke M; Mangelsdorf I; Pohlenz-Michel C; Simetska N; Lewin G
Toxicol Lett; 2014 Apr; 226(2):245-55. PubMed ID: 24525464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Update of OECD DART guidelines with endocrine disruptor relevant endpoints: Practical considerations.
Beekhuijzen M; van Otterdijk F; Wieland W; van Tuyl M; Rijcken RP; Peter B; Emmen H
Reprod Toxicol; 2016 Sep; 64():64-71. PubMed ID: 27063183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Unnecessary use of additional animals for determination of sexual maturation in the EOGRTS.
Oldenburger MM; Doomen MJ; Lourens NJJ; Beekhuijzen M
Reprod Toxicol; 2022 Sep; 112():14-22. PubMed ID: 35714935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproductive and developmental toxicity testing: Examination of the extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study guideline.
Saghir SA; Dorato MA
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Aug; 79():110-117. PubMed ID: 27074386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The way forward in reproductive/developmental toxicity testing.
Spielmann H
Altern Lab Anim; 2009 Dec; 37(6):641-56. PubMed ID: 20105000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A modular one-generation reproduction study as a flexible testing system for regulatory safety assessment.
Vogel R; Seidle T; Spielmann H
Reprod Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 29(2):242-5. PubMed ID: 19808091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the impact of second generation mating and offspring in multi-generation reproductive toxicity studies on classification and labelling of substances in Europe.
Rorije E; Muller A; Beekhuijzen ME; Hass U; Heinrich-Hirsch B; Paparella M; Schenk E; Ulbrich B; Hakkert BC; Piersma AH
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Nov; 61(2):251-60. PubMed ID: 21878359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Current developments in reproductive toxicity testing of pesticides.
Cooper RL
Reprod Toxicol; 2009 Sep; 28(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 19409482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility of the extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study (OECD 443).
Fegert I; Billington R; Botham P; Carney E; FitzGerald RE; Hanley T; Lewis R; Marty MS; Schneider S; Sheets LP; Stahl B; van Ravenzwaay B
Reprod Toxicol; 2012 Nov; 34(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 22677474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Developmental immunotoxicity of ethanol in an extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study.
Tonk EC; de Groot DM; Wolterbeek AP; Penninks AH; Waalkens-Berendsen ID; Piersma AH; van Loveren H
Arch Toxicol; 2013 Feb; 87(2):323-35. PubMed ID: 23007559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Regulatory Forum opinion piece: New testing paradigms for reproductive and developmental toxicity--the NTP modified one generation study and OECD 443.
Foster PM
Toxicol Pathol; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1165-7. PubMed ID: 24862797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigations on learning and memory function in extended one-generation reproductive toxicity studies - when considered needed and based on what?
Arts JHE; Faulhammer F; Schneider S; Salverda JGW
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2023 Jul; 53(6):372-384. PubMed ID: 37540214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of OECD screening tests 421 (reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test) and 422 (combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test).
Reuter U; Heinrich-Hirsch B; Hellwig J; Holzum B; Welsch F
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2003 Aug; 38(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 12878050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. To mate or not to mate: a retrospective analysis of two-generation studies for evaluation of criteria to trigger additional mating in the extended one-generation design.
Beekhuijzen M; Zmarowski A; Emmen H; Frieling W
Reprod Toxicol; 2009 Sep; 28(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 19426798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Critical aspects in reproductive and developmental toxicity testing of environmental chemicals.
Buschmann J
Reprod Toxicol; 2006 Aug; 22(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 16782303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Approaches and considerations for the assessment of immunotoxicity for environmental chemicals: a workshop summary.
Boverhof DR; Ladics G; Luebke B; Botham J; Corsini E; Evans E; Germolec D; Holsapple M; Loveless SE; Lu H; van der Laan JW; White KL; Yang Y
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Feb; 68(1):96-107. PubMed ID: 24280359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. REACH and reproductive and developmental toxicology: still questions.
Scialli AR; Guikema AJ
Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2012 Feb; 58(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 22239083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
