171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26942359)
1. Medication Abortion Through Telemedicine: Implications of a Ruling by the Iowa Supreme Court.
Yang YT; Kozhimannil KB
Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):313-6. PubMed ID: 26942359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
Martin PA
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion Provided Using Online Telemedicine in 30 US States Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
Aiken ARA; Starling JE; Scott JG; Gomperts R
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1768-1770. PubMed ID: 36318139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Societal implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision.
Brindis CD; Laitner MH; Clayton EW; Scrimshaw SC; Grosz BJ; Simpson LA; Rosenbaum S; Brierley CL; Simon MA; Roubideaux Y; Calonge BN; Johnson PA; DeStefano L; Bear A; Arora KS; Dzau VJ
Lancet; 2024 Jun; 403(10445):2751-2754. PubMed ID: 38795714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
Benshoof J
Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Legal Risks and Ethical Dilemmas for Clinicians in the Aftermath of Dobbs.
Reingold RB; Gostin LO; Goodwin MB
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1695-1696. PubMed ID: 36318123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Restricting Reasons: A New Battleground in Abortion Regulation.
Will JF
Hastings Cent Rep; 2020 Sep; 50(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 33095492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?
Gupta S; Perry B; Simon K
JAMA Health Forum; 2023 Apr; 4(4):e230518. PubMed ID: 37115538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Provision of Medications for Self-Managed Abortion Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
Aiken ARA; Wells ES; Gomperts R; Scott JG
JAMA; 2024 May; 331(18):1558-1564. PubMed ID: 38526865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion Access for Women in Custody in the Wake of
Herr A
Am J Law Med; 2023 Dec; 49(4):471-492. PubMed ID: 38563269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. State Abortion Restrictions and the New Supreme Court: Women's Access to Reproductive Health Services.
Reingold RB; Gostin LO
JAMA; 2019 Jul; 322(1):21-22. PubMed ID: 31166573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Understanding the Impacts of the Supreme Court Case FDA v Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine.
Espey E; Hailstorks T; Hofler L
JAMA; 2024 May; 331(18):1529-1530. PubMed ID: 38526871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion Disclosure Laws and the First Amendment: The Broader Public Health Implications of the Supreme Court's Becerra Decision.
Pomeranz JL
Am J Public Health; 2019 Mar; 109(3):412-418. PubMed ID: 30676798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law.
Denniston L
Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Supreme Court's Abortion Exceptionalism - Judicial Deference, Medical Science, and Mifepristone Access.
Fox D; Cole E
N Engl J Med; 2021 Jun; 384(24):e94. PubMed ID: 33909959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The United States Supreme Court ruling and women's reproductive rights - A position statement issued by The European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG).
Louwen F; Mukhopadhyay S; Mahmood T; Martins NN; Tarlatzis B;
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Dec; 279():130-131. PubMed ID: 36334375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Webster versus reproductive health services.
Rhodes AM
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1989; 14(6):423. PubMed ID: 2514333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tubal Sterilization Requests at a Single Institution Following the Supreme Court Decision to Overturn the Constitutional Right to Abortion.
Liang AC; Gliwa C; Loder CM; Dalton VK; Smith RD
JAMA; 2023 Jul; 330(4):374-375. PubMed ID: 37490094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Defying the will of the people: The US Supreme Court overturns right to abortion.
Macklin R
Indian J Med Ethics; 2022; VII(4):261-263. PubMed ID: 36398395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Supreme Court's spring term: abortion, the right to die, and the decline of privacy rights.
Wing KR
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1990; 15(4):919-28. PubMed ID: 2081895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
