These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26943083)

  • 1. A 12-month clinical trial examining the effects of a surface sealant on Class I composite resin restorations.
    Nahsan F; Wang L; Modena K; Francisconi-dos-Rios L; da Silva L; Calabria M; Casas-Apayco L; Mondelli RF
    Gen Dent; 2016; 64(2):18-20. PubMed ID: 26943083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Surface Sealant Reapplication on Clinical Performance of HEMA-containing and HEMA-free Self-etch Adhesives: Two-year Results.
    Tekçe N; Demirci M; Tuncer S; Göktürk SA
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 29782221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: six-year results.
    Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Smith CD; Williams JE; Sherrer JD; Mackert JR; Richards EE; Schuster GS; O'Dell NL; Pierce KL; Kovarik RE
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Dec; 23(12):827-38. PubMed ID: 1305301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Thirty-Six-Month Clinical Comparison of Bulk Fill and Nanofill Composite Restorations.
    Yazici AR; Antonson SA; Kutuk ZB; Ergin E
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(5):478-485. PubMed ID: 28581919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sealed restorations: 5-year results.
    Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Richards EE; Williams JE; Smith CD; Mackert JR; Schuster GS; Sherrer JD; O'Dell NL; Pierce KL; Wenner KK
    Am J Dent; 1992 Feb; 5(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 1524744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sealing composite with defective margins, good care or over treatment? Results of a 10-year clinical trial.
    Fernández E; Martin J; Vildósola P; Estay J; de Oliveira Júnior OB; Gordan V; Mjor I; Gonzalez J; Loguercio AD; Moncada G
    Oper Dent; 2015; 40(2):144-52. PubMed ID: 25535778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preventive resin restorations vs. amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study.
    Cloyd S; Gilpatrick RO; Moore D
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 77(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 9520761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-year clinical evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations.
    Yazici AR; Ustunkol I; Ozgunaltay G; Dayangac B
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24754716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study.
    Erdemir U; Sancakli HS; Yaman BC; Ozel S; Yucel T; Yıldız E
    J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 24296163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of a resin-based sealant with a nano-filled flowable resin composite on sealing performance of marginal defects in resin composites restorations: a 36-months clinical evaluation.
    Estay J; Pardo-Díaz C; Reinoso E; Perez-Iñigo J; Martín J; Jorquera G; Kuga M; Fernández E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Oct; 26(10):6087-6095. PubMed ID: 35608683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The preventive resin (composite resin/sealant) restoration: nine-year results.
    Houpt M; Fukus A; Eidelman E
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Mar; 25(3):155-9. PubMed ID: 8008812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of a sealant on the microleakage of composite resin restorations: an in vivo study.
    Akyüz S; Menteş A; Oktay C
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1992 Sep; 1(3):211-4. PubMed ID: 1308779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of a flowable resin composite and flowable compomer for preventive resin restorations.
    Qin M; Liu H
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):580-7. PubMed ID: 16268391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of Sealing Marginal Occlusal Defects of Composite Restorations with a Nanofiller-Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite: A Double-Blind, Randomised Clinical Trial with One-Year Follow-Up.
    Estay J; Bersezio C; Faune J; Correa MP; Angel P; Martín J; Fernández E
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2018; 16(6):491-497. PubMed ID: 30574603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
    Pascon FM; Kantovitz KR; Caldo-Teixeira AS; Borges AF; Silva TN; Puppin-Rontani RM; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Owens BM; Johnson WW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 16924989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical performance of preventive resin restorations placed in a hospital environment.
    King NM; Yung LK; Holmgren CJ
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Sep; 27(9):627-32. PubMed ID: 9180420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacid-modified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up.
    Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Palma-Dibb RG
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 15025658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alternative treatments for resin-based composite and amalgam restorations with marginal defects: a 12-month clinical trial.
    Moncada GC; Martin J; Fernandez E; Vildosola PG; Caamano C; Caro MJ; Mjor IA; Gordan VV
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(5):314-8. PubMed ID: 17004564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.