These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26943095)

  • 1. Effect of artificial aging on the surface roughness and microhardness of resin-based materials.
    Santos MJ; Rêgo HM; Mukhopadhyay A; El Najjar M; Santos GC
    Gen Dent; 2016; 64(2):e13-7. PubMed ID: 26943095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of chemical degradation on the surface properties of nano restorative materials.
    de Paula AB; de Fúcio SB; Alonso RC; Ambrosano GM; Puppin-Rontani RM
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):E109-17. PubMed ID: 24289802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Dent Res; 1997 Apr; 76(4):883-94. PubMed ID: 9126185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro evaluation of surface roughness and microhardness of restorative materials submitted to erosive challenges.
    Briso AL; Caruzo LP; Guedes AP; Catelan A; dos Santos PH
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 21827225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mineral loss on adjacent enamel glass ionomer cements restorations after cariogenic and erosive challenges.
    Salas CF; Guglielmi CA; Raggio DP; Mendes FM
    Arch Oral Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(10):1014-9. PubMed ID: 21489401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Curing units' ability to cure restorative composites and dual-cured composite cements under composite overlay.
    Park SH; Kim SS; Cho YS; Lee CK; Noh BD
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):627-35. PubMed ID: 15646217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of artificial aging on the roughness and microhardness of sealed composites.
    Catelan A; Briso AL; Sundfeld RH; Dos Santos PH
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2010 Oct; 22(5):324-30. PubMed ID: 21029336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of different beverages on the microhardness and surface roughness of resin composites.
    Badra VV; Faraoni JJ; Ramos RP; Palma-Dibb RG
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 15853107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of various beverages on hardness, roughness, and solubility of esthetic restorative materials.
    Hamouda IM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Oct; 23(5):315-22. PubMed ID: 21977954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of in-office tooth whiteners on hardness of tooth-colored restoratives.
    Yap AU; Wattanapayungkul P
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 11933903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of APF Minute-Foam on the surface roughness, hardness, and micromorphology of high-viscosity glass ionomers.
    García-Godoy F; García-Godoy A; García-Godoy F
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 12762603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of polishing techniques and time on the surface characteristics and sealing ability of resin composite restorations after one-year storage.
    Cenci MS; Venturini D; Pereira-Cenci T; Piva E; Demarco FF
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 18435191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of sonic and ultrasonic scaling on the surface roughness of tooth-colored restorative materials for cervical lesions.
    Lai YL; Lin YC; Chang CS; Lee SY
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 17555179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of photo-activation source on enamel demineralization around restorative materials.
    Ferla Jde O; Rodrigues JA; Arrais CA; Aranha AC; Cassoni A
    Braz Oral Res; 2013; 27(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 23459770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of cariogenic biofilm challenge on the surface hardness of direct restorative materials in situ.
    Barbosa RP; Pereira-Cenci T; Silva WM; Coelho-de-Souza FH; Demarco FF; Cenci MS
    J Dent; 2012 May; 40(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 22326721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conventional polishing techniques versus a nanofilled surface sealer: preliminary findings regarding surface roughness changes and analysis.
    Jefferies SR; Boston DW
    J Clin Dent; 2010; 21(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 20527508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of surface finish of new aesthetic restorative materials.
    Yap AU; Yap SH; Teo CK; Ng JJ
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 14753340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Knoop microhardness and FT-Raman spectroscopic evaluation of a resin-based dental material light-cured by an argon ion laser and halogen lamp: an in vitro study.
    Cassoni A; Ferla Jde O; Shibli JA; Kawano Y
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2008 Dec; 26(6):531-9. PubMed ID: 19099385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the effect of topical fluorides on the commercially available conventional glass ionomers, resin modified glass ionomers and polyacid modified composite resins--an in vitro study.
    Setty JV; Singh S; Subba Reddy VV
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Jun; 21(2):55-69. PubMed ID: 14700337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term mechanical characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
    Uno S; Finger WJ; Fritz U
    Dent Mater; 1996 Jan; 12(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 8598253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.