147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26943116)
1. Validity and Responsiveness of the Revised Nottingham Sensation Assessment for Outcome Evaluation in Stroke Rehabilitation.
Wu CY; Chuang IC; Ma HI; Lin KC; Chen CL
Am J Occup Ther; 2016; 70(2):7002290040p1-8. PubMed ID: 26943116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of French upper limb Erasmus modified Nottingham Sensory Assessment in stroke.
Villepinte C; Catella E; Martin M; Hidalgo S; Téchené S; Lebely C; Castel-Lacanal E; de Boissezon X; Chih H; Gasq D
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2019 Jan; 62(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 29660413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation.
Hsieh YW; Wu CY; Lin KC; Chang YF; Chen CL; Liu JS
Stroke; 2009 Apr; 40(4):1386-91. PubMed ID: 19228851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Responsiveness and validity of two outcome measures of instrumental activities of daily living in stroke survivors receiving rehabilitative therapies.
Wu CY; Chuang LL; Lin KC; Horng YS
Clin Rehabil; 2011 Feb; 25(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 21059664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychometric comparison of the shortened Fugl-Meyer Assessment and the streamlined Wolf Motor Function Test in stroke rehabilitation.
Fu TS; Wu CY; Lin KC; Hsieh CJ; Liu JS; Wang TN; Ou-Yang P
Clin Rehabil; 2012 Nov; 26(11):1043-7. PubMed ID: 22180444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity: reliability, responsiveness and validity of the Danish version.
Lundquist CB; Maribo T
Disabil Rehabil; 2017 May; 39(9):934-939. PubMed ID: 27062881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlations between motor and sensory functions in upper limb chronic hemiparetics after stroke.
Scalha TB; Miyasaki E; Lima NM; Borges G
Arq Neuropsiquiatr; 2011 Aug; 69(4):624-9. PubMed ID: 21877031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the action research arm test and the Fugl-Meyer assessment as measures of upper-extremity motor weakness after stroke.
Rabadi MH; Rabadi FM
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Jul; 87(7):962-6. PubMed ID: 16813784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The responsiveness and correlation between Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Motor Status Scale, and the Action Research Arm Test in chronic stroke with upper-extremity rehabilitation robotic training.
Wei XJ; Tong KY; Hu XL
Int J Rehabil Res; 2011 Dec; 34(4):349-56. PubMed ID: 22044987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of upper limb recovery, general disability, and rehabilitation status by activity measurements assessed by accelerometers or the Fugl-Meyer score in acute stroke.
Gebruers N; Truijen S; Engelborghs S; De Deyn PP
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Mar; 93(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 24398579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Psychometric properties of the sensory scale of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment in stroke patients.
Lin JH; Hsueh IP; Sheu CF; Hsieh CL
Clin Rehabil; 2004 Jun; 18(4):391-7. PubMed ID: 15180122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Responsiveness, minimal detectable change, and minimal clinically important difference of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale in patients with improved performance after stroke rehabilitation.
Wu CY; Chuang LL; Lin KC; Lee SD; Hong WH
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Aug; 92(8):1281-7. PubMed ID: 21807147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the streamlined Wolf motor function test as an outcome measure for stroke rehabilitation.
Wu CY; Fu T; Lin KC; Feng CT; Hsieh KP; Yu HW; Lin CH; Hsieh CJ; Ota H
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2011 Feb; 25(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 20947494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Somatosensory impairment after stroke: frequency of different deficits and their recovery.
Connell LA; Lincoln NB; Radford KA
Clin Rehabil; 2008 Aug; 22(8):758-67. PubMed ID: 18678576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychometric comparisons of 2 versions of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Scale and 2 versions of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement.
Hsueh IP; Hsu MJ; Sheu CF; Lee S; Hsieh CL; Lin JH
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2008; 22(6):737-44. PubMed ID: 18645189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Somatosensory Impairments in the Upper Limb Poststroke: Distribution and Association With Motor Function and Visuospatial Neglect.
Meyer S; De Bruyn N; Lafosse C; Van Dijk M; Michielsen M; Thijs L; Truyens V; Oostra K; Krumlinde-Sundholm L; Peeters A; Thijs V; Feys H; Verheyden G
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2016 Sep; 30(8):731-42. PubMed ID: 26719352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ability of three motor measures to predict functional outcomes reported by stroke patients after rehabilitation.
Li KY; Lin KC; Wang TN; Wu CY; Huang YH; Ouyang P
NeuroRehabilitation; 2012; 30(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 22672940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The prevalence, distribution, and functional importance of lower limb somatosensory impairments in chronic stroke survivors: a cross sectional observational study.
Gorst T; Rogers A; Morrison SC; Cramp M; Paton J; Freeman J; Marsden J
Disabil Rehabil; 2019 Oct; 41(20):2443-2450. PubMed ID: 29726732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Somatosensory assessment and treatment after stroke: An evidence-practice gap.
Pumpa LU; Cahill LS; Carey LM
Aust Occup Ther J; 2015 Apr; 62(2):93-104. PubMed ID: 25615889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How many body locations need to be tested when assessing sensation after stroke? An investigation of redundancy in the Rivermead Assessment of Somatosensory Performance.
Busse M; Tyson SF
Clin Rehabil; 2009 Jan; 23(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 19114441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
