These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2694329)

  • 1. Radiographic control of fixture-abutment connection in Brånemark implant technique.
    Sewerin IP
    Scand J Dent Res; 1989 Dec; 97(6):559-64. PubMed ID: 2694329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Errors in radiographic assessment of marginal bone height around osseointegrated implants.
    Sewerin IP
    Scand J Dent Res; 1990 Oct; 98(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 2293349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of angulation of Brånemark titanium fixtures from radiographic thread images.
    Sewerin IP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1991; 2(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 1807418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiographic image characteristics of Brånemark titanium fixtures.
    Sewerin I
    Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 1579887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiographical evaluation of the gap at the implant-abutment interface.
    Papavassiliou H; Kourtis S; Katerelou J; Chronopoulos V
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2010 Aug; 22(4):235-50. PubMed ID: 20690952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of radiographic image characteristics of Brånemark and IMZ implants.
    Sewerin IP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1991; 2(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 1843469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The UCLA abutment: a four-year review.
    Lewis SG; Llamas D; Avera S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Apr; 67(4):509-15. PubMed ID: 1507135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone reactions to longstanding functional load at implants: an experimental study in dogs.
    Berglundh T; Abrahamsson I; Lindhe J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Sep; 32(9):925-32. PubMed ID: 16104954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Placement of Brånemark implants in the maxillary tuber region: anatomical considerations, surgical technique and long-term results.
    Ridell A; Gröndahl K; Sennerby L
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 19126113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiographic verification of implant abutment seating.
    Cameron SM; Joyce A; Brousseau JS; Parker MH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Mar; 79(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 9553883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiographic follow-up analysis of Brånemark dental implants.
    Pikner SS
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2008; (194):5-69, 2. PubMed ID: 18652086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of angulated abutments for the Brånemark system: a pilot study.
    Kallus T; Henry P; Jemt T; Jorneus L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 2202668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of internal versus external abutment connection modes on crestal bone changes around dental implants: a radiographic analysis.
    Koo KT; Lee EJ; Kim JY; Seol YJ; Han JS; Kim TI; Lee YM; Ku Y; Wikesjö UM; Rhyu IC
    J Periodontol; 2012 Sep; 83(9):1104-9. PubMed ID: 22145806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The mucosal attachment at different abutments. An experimental study in dogs.
    Abrahamsson I; Berglundh T; Glantz PO; Lindhe J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1998 Sep; 25(9):721-7. PubMed ID: 9763327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short implants with a nanometer-sized CaP surface provided with either a platform-switched or platform-matched abutment connection in the posterior region: a randomized clinical trial.
    Telleman G; Meijer HJ; Vissink A; Raghoebar GM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Dec; 24(12):1316-24. PubMed ID: 22957911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraoral connection of individual abutment attachments for an osseointegrated implant-supported prosthesis.
    McCartney J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Dec; 66(6):799-803. PubMed ID: 1805034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the precision of fit between the Procera custom abutment and various implant systems.
    Lang LA; Sierraalta M; Hoffensperger M; Wang RF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):652-8. PubMed ID: 14579952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative strain gauge analysis of external and internal hexagon, Morse taper, and influence of straight and offset implant configuration.
    Nishioka RS; de Vasconcellos LG; de Melo Nishioka GN
    Implant Dent; 2011 Apr; 20(2):e24-32. PubMed ID: 21448016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. One-step surgical placement of Brånemark implants: a prospective multicenter clinical study.
    Becker W; Becker BE; Israelson H; Lucchini JP; Handelsman M; Ammons W; Rosenberg E; Rose L; Tucker LM; Lekholm U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):454-62. PubMed ID: 9274074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: a radiographic study in the canine mandible.
    King GN; Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Buser D; Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 2002 Oct; 73(10):1111-7. PubMed ID: 12416767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.