These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26943497)
1. Monte Carlo calculation of beam quality correction factors in proton beams using detailed simulation of ionization chambers. Gomà C; Andreo P; Sempau J Phys Med Biol; 2016 Mar; 61(6):2389-406. PubMed ID: 26943497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Monte Carlo calculation of beam quality correction factors in proton beams using TOPAS/GEANT4. Baumann KS; Kaupa S; Bach C; Engenhart-Cabillic R; Zink K Phys Med Biol; 2020 Mar; 65(5):055015. PubMed ID: 31962306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monte Carlo calculation of beam quality correction factors in proton beams using PENH. Gomà C; Sterpin E Phys Med Biol; 2019 Sep; 64(18):185009. PubMed ID: 31416054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monte Carlo simulated beam quality and perturbation correction factors for ionization chambers in monoenergetic proton beams. Kretschmer J; Dulkys A; Brodbek L; Stelljes TS; Looe HK; Poppe B Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5890-5905. PubMed ID: 32989779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monte Carlo calculated ionization chamber correction factors in clinical proton beams - deriving uncertainties from published data. Baumann KS; Gomà C; Wulff J; Kretschmer J; Zink K Phys Med; 2023 Sep; 113():102655. PubMed ID: 37603909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of ICRU report 90 recommendations on Monte Carlo calculated k Kawachi T; Saitoh H; Katayose T; Tohyama N; Miyasaka R; Cho SY; Iwase T; Hara R Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):5185-5194. PubMed ID: 31386762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental validation of beam quality correction factors for proton beams. Gomà C; Hofstetter-Boillat B; Safai S; Vörös S Phys Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 60(8):3207-16. PubMed ID: 25813370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monte Carlo calculation of perturbation correction factors for air-filled ionization chambers in clinical proton beams using TOPAS/GEANT. Baumann KS; Kaupa S; Bach C; Engenhart-Cabillic R; Zink K Z Med Phys; 2021 May; 31(2):175-191. PubMed ID: 33775521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consistency in quality correction factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in scanned proton beam therapy. Sorriaux J; Testa M; Paganetti H; Bertrand D; Lee JA; Palmans H; Vynckier S; Sterpin E Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4919-4927. PubMed ID: 28656604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consistency in reference radiotherapy dosimetry: resolution of an apparent conundrum when (60)Co is the reference quality for charged-particle and photon beams. Andreo P; Wulff J; Burns DT; Palmans H Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(19):6593-621. PubMed ID: 24018471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monte Carlo calculations of kQ, the beam quality conversion factor. Muir BR; Rogers DW Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5939-50. PubMed ID: 21158307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electron beam quality correction factors for plane-parallel ionization chambers: Monte Carlo calculations using the PENELOPE system. Sempau J; Andreo P; Aldana J; Mazurier J; Salvat F Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(18):4427-44. PubMed ID: 15509075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Calculation of k Pimpinella M; Silvi L; Pinto M Phys Med; 2019 Jan; 57():221-230. PubMed ID: 30660374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental and Monte Carlo studies of fluence corrections for graphite calorimetry in low- and high-energy clinical proton beams. Lourenço A; Thomas R; Bouchard H; Kacperek A; Vondracek V; Royle G; Palmans H Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4122. PubMed ID: 27370132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chamber-quality factors in 60Co for three plane-parallel chambers for the dosimetry of electrons, protons and heavier charged particles: PENELOPE Monte Carlo simulations. Panettieri V; Sempau J; Andreo P Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(21):5917-26. PubMed ID: 18836218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of new ICRU Report 90 recommendations on calculated correction factors for reference dosimetry. Czarnecki D; Poppe B; Zink K Phys Med Biol; 2018 Aug; 63(15):155015. PubMed ID: 29974869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Current best estimates of beam quality correction factors for reference dosimetry of clinical proton beams. Palmans H; Lourenço A; Medin J; Vatnitsky S; Andreo P Phys Med Biol; 2022 Sep; 67(19):. PubMed ID: 36096096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo calculation of beam quality correction factors in proton beams using FLUKA. Baumann KS; Derksen L; Witt M; Michael Burg J; Engenhart-Cabillic R; Zink K Phys Med Biol; 2021 Aug; 66(17):. PubMed ID: 34378546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Measured and Monte Carlo calculated K(Q) factors: accuracy and comparison. Muir BR; McEwen MR; Rogers DW Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4600-9. PubMed ID: 21928633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An analytical dose-averaged LET calculation algorithm considering the off-axis LET enhancement by secondary protons for spot-scanning proton therapy. Hirayama S; Matsuura T; Ueda H; Fujii Y; Fujii T; Takao S; Miyamoto N; Shimizu S; Fujimoto R; Umegaki K; Shirato H Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3404-3416. PubMed ID: 29788552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]