These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26943522)

  • 21. Experimental activation of bound entanglement.
    Kaneda F; Shimizu R; Ishizaka S; Mitsumori Y; Kosaka H; Edamatsu K
    Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Jul; 109(4):040501. PubMed ID: 23006069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Generic entanglement can be generated efficiently.
    Oliveira R; Dahlsten OC; Plenio MB
    Phys Rev Lett; 2007 Mar; 98(13):130502. PubMed ID: 17501174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Entanglement in the Born-Oppenheimer Approximation.
    Izmaylov AF; Franco I
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Jan; 13(1):20-28. PubMed ID: 27959533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Entanglement of formation of bipartite quantum states.
    Chen K; Albeverio S; Fei SM
    Phys Rev Lett; 2005 Nov; 95(21):210501. PubMed ID: 16384121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Open-system dynamics of graph-state entanglement.
    Cavalcanti D; Chaves R; Aolita L; Davidovich L; Acín A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2009 Jul; 103(3):030502. PubMed ID: 19659258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Wave-Particle-Entanglement-Ignorance Complementarity for General Bipartite Systems.
    Wu W; Wang J
    Entropy (Basel); 2020 Jul; 22(8):. PubMed ID: 33286583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Entanglement of two qubits mediated by one-dimensional plasmonic waveguides.
    Gonzalez-Tudela A; Martin-Cano D; Moreno E; Martin-Moreno L; Tejedor C; Garcia-Vidal FJ
    Phys Rev Lett; 2011 Jan; 106(2):020501. PubMed ID: 21405211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Minimal control power of controlled dense coding and genuine tripartite entanglement.
    Oh C; Kim H; Jeong K; Jeong H
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):3765. PubMed ID: 28630498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Highly entangled ground States in tripartite qubit systems.
    Röthlisberger B; Lehmann J; Saraga DS; Traber P; Loss D
    Phys Rev Lett; 2008 Mar; 100(10):100502. PubMed ID: 18352167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Operational families of entanglement classes for symmetric N-qubit States.
    Bastin T; Krins S; Mathonet P; Godefroid M; Lamata L; Solano E
    Phys Rev Lett; 2009 Aug; 103(7):070503. PubMed ID: 19792626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Measuring Quantum Coherence with Entanglement.
    Streltsov A; Singh U; Dhar HS; Bera MN; Adesso G
    Phys Rev Lett; 2015 Jul; 115(2):020403. PubMed ID: 26207452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Obtaining a W state from a Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger state via stochastic local operations and classical communication with a rate approaching unity.
    Yu N; Guo C; Duan R
    Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Apr; 112(16):160401. PubMed ID: 24815624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Experimental Schmidt decomposition and state independent entanglement detection.
    Laskowski W; Richart D; Schwemmer C; Paterek T; Weinfurter H
    Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Jun; 108(24):240501. PubMed ID: 23004245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Construction of an optimal witness for unknown two-qubit entanglement.
    Park HS; Lee SS; Kim H; Choi SK; Sim HS
    Phys Rev Lett; 2010 Dec; 105(23):230404. PubMed ID: 21231433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bounds on entanglement dimensions and quantum graph parameters via noncommutative polynomial optimization.
    Gribling S; de Laat D; Laurent M
    Math Program; 2018; 170(1):5-42. PubMed ID: 30996477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Most quantum States are too entangled to be useful as computational resources.
    Gross D; Flammia ST; Eisert J
    Phys Rev Lett; 2009 May; 102(19):190501. PubMed ID: 19518930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. General monogamy relation for the entanglement of formation in multiqubit systems.
    Bai YK; Xu YF; Wang ZD
    Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Sep; 113(10):100503. PubMed ID: 25238341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tripartite entanglement transformations and tensor rank.
    Chitambar E; Duan R; Shi Y
    Phys Rev Lett; 2008 Oct; 101(14):140502. PubMed ID: 18851511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Entanglement cost of bipartite mixed states.
    Vidal G; Dür W; Cirac JI
    Phys Rev Lett; 2002 Jul; 89(2):027901. PubMed ID: 12097017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Classification of general n-qubit states under stochastic local operations and classical communication in terms of the rank of coefficient matrix.
    Li X; Li D
    Phys Rev Lett; 2012 May; 108(18):180502. PubMed ID: 22681051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.