These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26944008)
1. Injury rates from peripheral catheters with or without safety devices in a Brazilian public hospital. de Carvalho Pdo C; Reis RK; Pereira FM; Malaguti-Toffano SE Am J Infect Control; 2016 Jul; 44(7):853-4. PubMed ID: 26944008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Waking up to the benefits of safety I.V. catheters. Perry J; Jagger J Nursing; 2006 Feb; 36(2):68. PubMed ID: 16462277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Two ways to avoid a "sticky" I.V. situation. Przybylek C Nursing; 2002 Nov; 32(11 Pt 1):47-9. PubMed ID: 12441856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Prevention of infection in peripheral intravenous devices. Lavery I; Ingram P Nurs Stand; 2006 Aug 16-22; 20(49):49-56; quiz 57. PubMed ID: 16939144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implantable port needlestick injuries and protective devices. Dobson P N Z Med J; 1994 Jun; 107(980):254. PubMed ID: 8208509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Using an intravenous catheter system to prevent needlestick injury. Sossai D; Puro V; Chiappatoli L; Dagnino G; Odone B; Polimeri A; Ruzza L; Palombo P; Fuscoe MS; Scognamiglio P Nurs Stand; 2010 Mar 24-30; 24(29):42-6. PubMed ID: 20426370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical acceptability and ease of use of a safety IV catheter system. Ruiz-Sternberg A; Velez-Van-Meerbeke A; Ruiz-Sternberg J Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Aug; 28(8):1381-7. PubMed ID: 22738803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Needlestick-prevention devices. Focus on blood collection devices and catheters. Health Devices; 1998 Jun; 27(6):184-232. PubMed ID: 9669183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Prevalence and prevention of needlestick injuries among health care workers in a German university hospital. Wicker S; Jung J; Allwinn R; Gottschalk R; Rabenau HF Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2008 Jan; 81(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 17619897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variation in blood and body fluids exposure when small-gauge needles or peripheral venous catheters were implicated: results of a 4-year surveillance in France. L'Hériteau F; Tarantola A; Olivier M; Grandbastien B; Maugat S; Bouvet E; Astagneau P; Am J Infect Control; 2006 May; 34(4):215-7. PubMed ID: 16679179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Safe equipment to prevent injuries in medical staff]. Gańczak M Med Pr; 2007; 58(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 17571624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ongoing use of conventional devices and safety device activation rates in hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Stringer B; Haines T J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Mar; 8(3):154-60. PubMed ID: 21347957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Remaining of a safety clip within the hub of the Surshield Surflow II i.v. catheter]. Sugiura S; Seki S; Karasawa N; Fukuhara N; Tsuchida H Masui; 2004 Nov; 53(11):1315-6. PubMed ID: 15587190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hazard report: risk of needlestick injuries from failure of shielded i.v. catheters. Healthc Hazard Manage Monit; 2002 Feb; 15(6):1-2. PubMed ID: 11828588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. National evaluation of safety peripheral intravenous catheters in a clinician-led project. Guerrero MA Br J Nurs; 2019 Jan; 28(2):S29-S32. PubMed ID: 30673320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]