These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26944014)
1. Rationing for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Using the New Zealand Orthopaedic Association Score: Effectiveness and Comparison With Patient-Reported Scores. Gwynne-Jones DP; Iosua EE; Stout KM J Arthroplasty; 2016 May; 31(5):957-62. PubMed ID: 26944014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of the 6-month waiting target for elective surgery: a patient record study. Blackett J; Carslaw A; Lees D; Fargher S; Rao S; Pohl M N Z Med J; 2014 Nov; 127(1405):45-53. PubMed ID: 25399041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rationing of hip and knee replacement: effect on the severity of patient-reported symptoms and the demand for surgery in Otago. Gwynne-Jones D; Iosua E N Z Med J; 2016 Apr; 129(1432):59-66. PubMed ID: 27356253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Arthroplasty Candidacy Help Engine tool to select candidates for hip and knee replacement surgery: development and economic modelling. Price A; Smith J; Dakin H; Kang S; Eibich P; Cook J; Gray A; Harris K; Middleton R; Gibbons E; Benedetto E; Smith S; Dawson J; Fitzpatrick R; Sayers A; Miller L; Marques E; Gooberman-Hill R; Blom A; Judge A; Arden N; Murray D; Glyn-Jones S; Barker K; Carr A; Beard D Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jun; 23(32):1-216. PubMed ID: 31287051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How effective is our current Orthopaedic Prioritisation Tool for scoring patients for arthroplasty surgery? Singleton N; Agius L; Rao S N Z Med J; 2016 Sep; 129(1442):52-9. PubMed ID: 27657159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The variability in Oxford hip and knee scores in the preoperative period: is there an ideal time to score? Quah C; Holmes D; Khan T; Cockshott S; Lewis J; Stephen A Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2018 Jan; 100(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 29022778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The outcomes of patients returned to general practitioner after being declined hip and knee replacement. Anitelea T; Gwynne-Jones D; Ebramjee A; Iosua E N Z Med J; 2017 Oct; 130(1464):25-32. PubMed ID: 29073654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can the Oxford Knee and Hip Score identify patients who do not require total knee or hip arthroplasty? Neufeld ME; Masri BA Bone Joint J; 2019 Jun; 101-B(6_Supple_B):23-30. PubMed ID: 31146569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The relationship between the American Society Of Anesthesiologists physical rating and outcome following total hip and knee arthroplasty: an analysis of theNew Zealand Joint Registry. Hooper GJ; Rothwell AG; Hooper NM; Frampton C J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):1065-70. PubMed ID: 22717825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patients waiting for a hip or knee joint replacement: is there any prioritization for surgery? McHugh GA; Campbell M; Silman AJ; Kay PR; Luker KA J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Jun; 14(3):361-7. PubMed ID: 18373585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient-reported health outcomes after total hip and knee surgery in a Dutch University Hospital Setting: results of twenty years clinical registry. van der Wees PJ; Wammes JJ; Akkermans RP; Koetsenruijter J; Westert GP; van Kampen A; Hannink G; de Waal-Malefijt M; Schreurs BW BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Mar; 18(1):97. PubMed ID: 28253923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Physical activity after total joint replacement: a cross-sectional survey. Bauman S; Williams D; Petruccelli D; Elliott W; de Beer J Clin J Sport Med; 2007 Mar; 17(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 17414477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An analysis of the Oxford hip and knee scores and their relationship to early joint revision in the New Zealand Joint Registry. Rothwell AG; Hooper GJ; Hobbs A; Frampton CM J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Mar; 92(3):413-8. PubMed ID: 20190314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rationing of hip and knee referrals in the public hospital: the true unmet need. Inglis T; Armour P; Inglis G; Hooper G N Z Med J; 2017 Mar; 130(1452):39-48. PubMed ID: 28337039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparative analysis of patient-centered outcome of total hip and knee arthroplasty]. Wollmerstedt N; Glatzel M; Kirschner S; Schneider J; Faller H; König A Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2006; 144(5):464-71. PubMed ID: 16991061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitivity to Change of a Computer Adaptive Testing Instrument for Outcome Measurement After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty and Periacetabular Osteotomy. McDonough CM; Stoiber E; Tomek IM; Ni P; Kim YJ; Tian F; Jette AM J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2016 Sep; 46(9):756-67. PubMed ID: 27494055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Influence of patellofemoral joint degeneration on outcome of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty]. Xu BY; Ji BC; Guo WT; Mu WB; Cao L Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 55(6):416-422. PubMed ID: 28592073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient-reported quality of life after primary major joint arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of hip and knee arthroplasty. Dailiana ZH; Papakostidou I; Varitimidis S; Liaropoulos L; Zintzaras E; Karachalios T; Michelinakis E; Malizos KN BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Nov; 16():366. PubMed ID: 26612135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prioritization of patients on scheduled waiting lists: validation of a scoring system for hip and knee arthroplasty. Conner-Spady BL; Arnett G; McGurran JJ; Noseworthy TW; Can J Surg; 2004 Feb; 47(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 14997924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prioritization of patients on waiting lists for hip and knee replacement: validation of a priority criteria tool. Conner-Spady B; Estey A; Arnett G; Ness K; McGurran J; Bear R; Noseworthy T; Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2004; 20(4):509-15. PubMed ID: 15609803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]