These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26944294)

  • 1. Three challenges described for identifying participants with missing data in trials reports, and potential solutions suggested to systematic reviewers.
    Akl EA; Kahale LA; Ebrahim S; Alonso-Coello P; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 76():147-54. PubMed ID: 26944294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of missing participant data for dichotomous outcomes on pooled effect estimates in systematic reviews: a protocol for a methodological study.
    Akl EA; Kahale LA; Agarwal A; Al-Matari N; Ebrahim S; Alexander PE; Briel M; Brignardello-Petersen R; Busse JW; Diab B; Iorio A; Kwong J; Li L; Lopes LC; Mustafa R; Neumann I; Tikkinen KA; Vandvik PO; Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt G
    Syst Rev; 2014 Nov; 3():137. PubMed ID: 25423894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Potentially missing data are considerably more frequent than definitely missing data: a methodological survey of 638 randomized controlled trials.
    Kahale LA; Diab B; Khamis AM; Chang Y; Lopes LC; Agarwal A; Li L; Mustafa RA; Koujanian S; Waziry R; Busse JW; Dakik A; Guyatt G; Akl EA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 106():18-31. PubMed ID: 30300676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological survey.
    Akl EA; Carrasco-Labra A; Brignardello-Petersen R; Neumann I; Johnston BC; Sun X; Briel M; Busse JW; Ebrahim S; Granados CE; Iorio A; Irfan A; Martínez García L; Mustafa RA; Ramírez-Morera A; Selva A; Solà I; Sanabria AJ; Tikkinen KA; Vandvik PO; Vernooij RW; Zazueta OE; Zhou Q; Guyatt GH; Alonso-Coello P
    BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e009368. PubMed ID: 26423858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews.
    Kirkham JJ; Dwan KM; Altman DG; Gamble C; Dodd S; Smyth R; Williamson PR
    BMJ; 2010 Feb; 340():c365. PubMed ID: 20156912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reporting and handling missing outcome data in mental health: a systematic review of Cochrane systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Spineli LM; Pandis N; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Jun; 6(2):175-87. PubMed ID: 26099485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Addressing continuous data for participants excluded from trial analysis: a guide for systematic reviewers.
    Ebrahim S; Akl EA; Mustafa RA; Sun X; Walter SD; Heels-Ansdell D; Alonso-Coello P; Johnston BC; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1014-1021.e1. PubMed ID: 23774111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatment of missing data in follow-up studies of randomised controlled trials: A systematic review of the literature.
    Sullivan TR; Yelland LN; Lee KJ; Ryan P; Salter AB
    Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):387-395. PubMed ID: 28385071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Many scenarios exist for selective inclusion and reporting of results in randomized trials and systematic reviews.
    Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Forbes A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 May; 66(5):524-37. PubMed ID: 23337785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Handling trial participants with missing outcome data when conducting a meta-analysis: a systematic survey of proposed approaches.
    Akl EA; Kahale LA; Agoritsas T; Brignardello-Petersen R; Busse JW; Carrasco-Labra A; Ebrahim S; Johnston BC; Neumann I; Sola I; Sun X; Vandvik P; Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt G
    Syst Rev; 2015 Jul; 4():98. PubMed ID: 26202162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews.
    Saini P; Loke YK; Gamble C; Altman DG; Williamson PR; Kirkham JJ
    BMJ; 2014 Nov; 349():g6501. PubMed ID: 25416499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reporting missing participant data in randomised trials: systematic survey of the methodological literature and a proposed guide.
    Akl EA; Shawwa K; Kahale LA; Agoritsas T; Brignardello-Petersen R; Busse JW; Carrasco-Labra A; Ebrahim S; Johnston BC; Neumann I; Sola I; Sun X; Vandvik P; Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt GH
    BMJ Open; 2015 Dec; 5(12):e008431. PubMed ID: 26719310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A systematic survey on reporting and methods for handling missing participant data for continuous outcomes in randomized controlled trials.
    Zhang Y; Flórez ID; Colunga Lozano LE; Aloweni FAB; Kennedy SA; Li A; Craigie S; Zhang S; Agarwal A; Lopes LC; Devji T; Wiercioch W; Riva JJ; Wang M; Jin X; Fei Y; Alexander P; Morgano GP; Zhang Y; Carrasco-Labra A; Kahale LA; Akl EA; Schünemann HJ; Thabane L; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 88():57-66. PubMed ID: 28583378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A guidance was developed to identify participants with missing outcome data in randomized controlled trials.
    Kahale LA; Guyatt GH; Agoritsas T; Briel M; Busse JW; Carrasco-Labra A; Khamis AM; Zhang Y; Hooft L; Scholten RJPM; Akl EA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Nov; 115():55-63. PubMed ID: 31299357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A systematic review and development of a classification framework for factors associated with missing patient-reported outcome data.
    Palmer MJ; Mercieca-Bebber R; King M; Calvert M; Richardson H; Brundage M
    Clin Trials; 2018 Feb; 15(1):95-106. PubMed ID: 29124956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. GRADE guidelines 17: assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant outcome data in a body of evidence.
    Guyatt GH; Ebrahim S; Alonso-Coello P; Johnston BC; Mathioudakis AG; Briel M; Mustafa RA; Sun X; Walter SD; Heels-Ansdell D; Neumann I; Kahale LA; Iorio A; Meerpohl J; Schünemann HJ; Akl EA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 87():14-22. PubMed ID: 28529188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Missing binary data extraction challenges from Cochrane reviews in mental health and Campbell reviews with implications for empirical research.
    Spineli LM
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):514-525. PubMed ID: 28961395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Addressing continuous data measured with different instruments for participants excluded from trial analysis: a guide for systematic reviewers.
    Ebrahim S; Johnston BC; Akl EA; Mustafa RA; Sun X; Walter SD; Heels-Ansdell D; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 May; 67(5):560-70. PubMed ID: 24613497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic reviews do not adequately report or address missing outcome data in their analyses: a methodological survey.
    Kahale LA; Diab B; Brignardello-Petersen R; Agarwal A; Mustafa RA; Kwong J; Neumann I; Li L; Lopes LC; Briel M; Busse JW; Iorio A; Vandvik PO; Alexander PE; Guyatt G; Akl EA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 99():14-23. PubMed ID: 29505859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A systematic survey of the methods literature on the reporting quality and optimal methods of handling participants with missing outcome data for continuous outcomes in randomized controlled trials.
    Zhang Y; Alyass A; Vanniyasingam T; Sadeghirad B; Flórez ID; Pichika SC; Kennedy SA; Abdulkarimova U; Zhang Y; Iljon T; Morgano GP; Colunga Lozano LE; Aloweni FAB; Lopes LC; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Fei Y; Wang L; Kahale LA; Meyre D; Akl EA; Thabane L; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 88():67-80. PubMed ID: 28579378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.