These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26944579)

  • 1. The Calgary semantic decision project: concrete/abstract decision data for 10,000 English words.
    Pexman PM; Heard A; Lloyd E; Yap MJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Apr; 49(2):407-417. PubMed ID: 26944579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A database of 629 English compound words: ratings of familiarity, lexeme meaning dominance, semantic transparency, age of acquisition, imageability, and sensory experience.
    Juhasz BJ; Lai YH; Woodcock ML
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Dec; 47(4):1004-1019. PubMed ID: 25361864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 mono- and disyllabic words.
    Juhasz BJ; Yap MJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Mar; 45(1):160-8. PubMed ID: 22936106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Situated conceptualization and semantic processing: effects of emotional experience and context availability in semantic categorization and naming tasks.
    Moffat M; Siakaluk PD; Sidhu DM; Pexman PM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Apr; 22(2):408-19. PubMed ID: 25092388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Concreteness in word processing: ERP and behavioral effects in a lexical decision task.
    Barber HA; Otten LJ; Kousta ST; Vigliocco G
    Brain Lang; 2013 Apr; 125(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 23454073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orthographic neighborhood and concreteness effects in the lexical decision task.
    Samson D; Pillon A
    Brain Lang; 2004 Nov; 91(2):252-64. PubMed ID: 15485714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual differences in semantic processing: Insights from the Calgary semantic decision project.
    Pexman PM; Yap MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1091-1112. PubMed ID: 29481104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concreteness norms for 1,659 French words: Relationships with other psycholinguistic variables and word recognition times.
    Bonin P; Méot A; Bugaiska A
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2366-2387. PubMed ID: 29435912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Concreteness effects in single-meaning, multi-meaning and newly acquired words.
    Palmer SD; Macgregor LJ; Havelka J
    Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 1538():135-50. PubMed ID: 24064384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of semantic neighborhood density in abstract and concrete words.
    Reilly M; Desai RH
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():46-53. PubMed ID: 28818790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spanish norms for affective and lexico-semantic variables for 1,400 words.
    Guasch M; Ferré P; Fraga I
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Dec; 48(4):1358-1369. PubMed ID: 26542969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Imaginal, semantic, and surface-level processing of concrete and abstract words: an electrophysiological investigation.
    West WC; Holcomb PJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2000 Nov; 12(6):1024-37. PubMed ID: 11177422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An exploration of the semantic network in Alzheimer's disease: Influence of emotion and concreteness of concepts.
    Giffard B; Laisney M; Desgranges B; Eustache F
    Cortex; 2015 Aug; 69():201-11. PubMed ID: 26094148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Chinese Lexicon Project II: A megastudy of speeded naming performance for 25,000+ traditional Chinese two-character words.
    Tse CS; Chan YL; Yap MJ; Tsang HC
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):4382-4402. PubMed ID: 36443581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical and methodological problems with concreteness and other semantic variables: A list memory experiment case study.
    Pollock L
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Jun; 50(3):1198-1216. PubMed ID: 28707214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The neural manifestation of the word concreteness effect: an electrical neuroimaging study.
    Adorni R; Proverbio AM
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Apr; 50(5):880-91. PubMed ID: 22313624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semantic size does not matter: "bigger" words are not recognized faster.
    Kang SH; Yap MJ; Tse CS; Kurby CA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1041-7. PubMed ID: 21644189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of word prevalence on lexical decision times: Evidence from the Dutch Lexicon Project 2.
    Brysbaert M; Stevens M; Mandera P; Keuleers E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Mar; 42(3):441-58. PubMed ID: 26501839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differential emotional processing in concrete and abstract words.
    Yao B; Keitel A; Bruce G; Scott GG; O'Donnell PJ; Sereno SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1064-1074. PubMed ID: 29431458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semantic richness, concreteness, and object domain: an electrophysiological study.
    Amsel BD; Cree GS
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Jun; 67(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 23046416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.