293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26944687)
1. How accurately can subject-specific finite element models predict strains and strength of human femora? Investigation using full-field measurements.
Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Ristinmaa M; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
J Biomech; 2016 Mar; 49(5):802-806. PubMed ID: 26944687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experimental validation of finite element model for proximal composite femur using optical measurements.
Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Amin Yavari S; Weinans H; Jurvelin JS; Zadpoor AA; Isaksson H
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 May; 21():86-94. PubMed ID: 23510970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method.
Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsuyama J; Matsumoto T; Imai K; Nakamura K
J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1745-53. PubMed ID: 17034798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. To what extent can linear finite element models of human femora predict failure under stance and fall loading configurations?
Schileo E; Balistreri L; Grassi L; Cristofolini L; Taddei F
J Biomech; 2014 Nov; 47(14):3531-8. PubMed ID: 25261321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Full-field strain measurement during mechanical testing of the human femur at physiologically relevant strain rates.
Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Yavari SA; Jurvelin JS; Weinans H; Ristinmaa M; Zadpoor AA; Isaksson H
J Biomech Eng; 2014 Nov; 136(11):. PubMed ID: 25162941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Femoral strength and strains in sideways fall: Validation of finite element models against bilateral strain measurements.
Kok J; Grassi L; Gustafsson A; Isaksson H
J Biomech; 2021 Jun; 122():110445. PubMed ID: 33933857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of femoral strength using 3D finite element models reconstructed from DXA images: validation against experiments.
Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Ristinmaa M; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2017 Jun; 16(3):989-1000. PubMed ID: 28004226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subject-specific finite element models implementing a maximum principal strain criterion are able to estimate failure risk and fracture location on human femurs tested in vitro.
Schileo E; Taddei F; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
J Biomech; 2008; 41(2):356-67. PubMed ID: 18022179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones.
Schileo E; Taddei F; Malandrino A; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
J Biomech; 2007; 40(13):2982-9. PubMed ID: 17434172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of finite element predictions in sideways load configurations for the proximal human femur.
Grassi L; Schileo E; Taddei F; Zani L; Juszczyk M; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
J Biomech; 2012 Jan; 45(2):394-9. PubMed ID: 22079387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of femur strain under different loading scenarios: Experimental testing.
Levadnyi I; Awrejcewicz J; Zhang Y; Gu Y
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Jan; 235(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 32811293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New insights on the proximal femur biomechanics using Digital Image Correlation.
Katz Y; Yosibash Z
J Biomech; 2020 Mar; 101():109599. PubMed ID: 32008806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of finite element analysis for prediction of the strength reduction due to metastatic lesions in the femoral neck.
Cheal EJ; Hipp JA; Hayes WC
J Biomech; 1993 Mar; 26(3):251-64. PubMed ID: 8468338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Finite element prediction of surface strain and fracture strength at the distal radius.
Edwards WB; Troy KL
Med Eng Phys; 2012 Apr; 34(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 21840240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How accurately can we predict the fracture load of the proximal femur using finite element models?
van den Munckhof S; Zadpoor AA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Apr; 29(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 24485865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of boundary conditions, impact loading and hydraulic stiffening on femoral fracture strength.
Haider IT; Speirs AD; Frei H
J Biomech; 2013 Sep; 46(13):2115-21. PubMed ID: 23906770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study.
Miura M; Nakamura J; Matsuura Y; Wako Y; Suzuki T; Hagiwara S; Orita S; Inage K; Kawarai Y; Sugano M; Nawata K; Ohtori S
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Dec; 18(1):536. PubMed ID: 29246133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimental validation of a finite element model of the proximal femur using digital image correlation and a composite bone model.
Dickinson AS; Taylor AC; Ozturk H; Browne M
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Jan; 133(1):014504. PubMed ID: 21186906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: Part I--Linear analysis.
Lotz JC; Cheal EJ; Hayes WC
J Biomech Eng; 1991 Nov; 113(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 1762430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
