BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26945257)

  • 1. Minimal Acute Recoil Following Bioresorbable Scaffold Implantation in Fibrocalcific Lesion Detected by Optical Frequency-Domain Imaging.
    Kawamoto H; Ruparelia N; Tanaka A; Latib A; Colombo A
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2016 Mar; 28(3):E34-6. PubMed ID: 26945257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of acute expansion of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus metallic drug-eluting stents in different degrees of calcification: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study.
    Ming Fam J; van Der Sijde JN; Karanasos A; Felix C; Diletti R; van Mieghem N; de Jaegere P; Zijlstra F; Jan van Geuns R; Regar E
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Apr; 89(5):798-810. PubMed ID: 27717119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of strut thickness on acute mechanical performance: A comparison study using optical coherence tomography between DESolve 150 and DESolve 100.
    Boeder NF; Dörr O; Bauer T; Mattesini A; Elsässer A; Liebetrau C; Achenbach S; Hamm CW; Nef HM
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Nov; 246():74-79. PubMed ID: 28579164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictors of acute scaffold recoil after implantation of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold: an optical coherence tomography assessment in native coronary arteries.
    Sato T; Jose J; El-Mawardy M; Sulimov DS; Tölg R; Richardt G; Abdel-Wahab M
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 33(2):145-152. PubMed ID: 27761749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Complex bifurcation lesions: Randomized comparison of a fully bioresorbable modified t stenting strategy versus bifurcation reconstruction with a dedicated self-expanding stent in combination with bioresorbable scaffolds, an OCT study: Rationale and design of the COBRA II trial.
    Bennett J; Adriaenssens T; Desmet W; Dubois C
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Nov; 88(6):843-853. PubMed ID: 27184586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computed tomography angiography for guiding and follow-up of magnesium-bioresorbable scaffold implantation.
    Opolski MP; Kepka C; Wojakowski W; Witkowski A
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2019 Mar; 108(3):344-346. PubMed ID: 30182164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Severe Neointimal Hyperplasia of Neoplastic Carina Following Bioresorbable Scaffold Implantation Using T-Stenting and Small Protrusion Technique: Insights From Optical Frequency Domain Imaging.
    Kawamoto H; Ruparelia N; Figini F; Latib A; Colombo A
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):e207-9. PubMed ID: 26476605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A next-generation bioresorbable coronary scaffold system: from bench to first clinical evaluation: 6- and 12-month clinical and multimodality imaging results.
    Verheye S; Ormiston JA; Stewart J; Webster M; Sanidas E; Costa R; Costa JR; Chamie D; Abizaid AS; Pinto I; Morrison L; Toyloy S; Bhat V; Yan J; Abizaid A
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 24139932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incidence and imaging outcomes of acute scaffold disruption and late structural discontinuity after implantation of the absorb Everolimus-Eluting fully bioresorbable vascular scaffold: optical coherence tomography assessment in the ABSORB cohort B Trial (A Clinical Evaluation of the Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).
    Onuma Y; Serruys PW; Muramatsu T; Nakatani S; van Geuns RJ; de Bruyne B; Dudek D; Christiansen E; Smits PC; Chevalier B; McClean D; Koolen J; Windecker S; Whitbourn R; Meredith I; Garcia-Garcia HM; Veldhof S; Rapoza R; Ormiston JA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Dec; 7(12):1400-11. PubMed ID: 25523532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. First serial assessment at 6 months and 2 years of the second generation of absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: a multi-imaging modality study.
    Ormiston JA; Serruys PW; Onuma Y; van Geuns RJ; de Bruyne B; Dudek D; Thuesen L; Smits PC; Chevalier B; McClean D; Koolen J; Windecker S; Whitbourn R; Meredith I; Dorange C; Veldhof S; Hebert KM; Rapoza R; Garcia-Garcia HM
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Oct; 5(5):620-32. PubMed ID: 23048057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expansion in calcific lesions and overall clinical outcomes following bioresorbable scaffold implantation optimized with intravascular ultrasound.
    Kawamoto H; Ruparelia N; Latib A; Miyazaki T; Sato K; Tanaka A; Naganuma T; Sticchi A; Chieffo A; Carlino M; Montorfano M; Colombo A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Apr; 89(5):789-797. PubMed ID: 27545845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "Golden tube" with favorable vessel remodeling at four-year follow-up after bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation for moderate to severe calcified lesions: Insights from intravascular imaging.
    Mitomo S; Candilio L; Tanaka A; Latib A; Colombo A
    Cardiol J; 2018; 25(4):532-533. PubMed ID: 30211931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the second generation of a bioresorbable everolimus drug-eluting vascular scaffold for treatment of de novo coronary artery stenosis: six-month clinical and imaging outcomes.
    Serruys PW; Onuma Y; Ormiston JA; de Bruyne B; Regar E; Dudek D; Thuesen L; Smits PC; Chevalier B; McClean D; Koolen J; Windecker S; Whitbourn R; Meredith I; Dorange C; Veldhof S; Miquel-Hebert K; Rapoza R; García-García HM
    Circulation; 2010 Nov; 122(22):2301-12. PubMed ID: 21098436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Expansion and malapposition characteristics after bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation.
    Brown AJ; McCormick LM; Braganza DM; Bennett MR; Hoole SP; West NE
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jul; 84(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 24403223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coregistered intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography imaging during implantation of a bioresorbable vascular scaffold.
    Brown AJ; McCormick LM; Hoole SP; West NE
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 6(7):e41-2. PubMed ID: 23866193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treading the risky ground of coronary bifurcation lesion revascularization, the "biodegradable strategy" may represent the lifeline.
    Piraino D; Buccheri D; Andolina G
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 221():577-80. PubMed ID: 27420582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Polylactide Bioresorbable Scaffold Eluting Everolimus for Treatment of Coronary Stenosis: 5-Year Follow-Up.
    Serruys PW; Ormiston J; van Geuns RJ; de Bruyne B; Dudek D; Christiansen E; Chevalier B; Smits P; McClean D; Koolen J; Windecker S; Whitbourn R; Meredith I; Wasungu L; Ediebah D; Veldhof S; Onuma Y
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2016 Feb; 67(7):766-76. PubMed ID: 26892411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new novolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold for large coronary arteries: an OCT study of acute mechanical performance.
    Boeder NF; Koepp T; Dörr O; Bauer T; Mattesini A; Elsässer A; Möllmann H; Blachutzik F; Achenbach S; Ghanem A; Hamm CW; Nef HM
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 220():706-10. PubMed ID: 27393853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dislodgement of a magnesium bioresorbable scaffold from the delivery system in the left main: A true "nightmaris".
    Cortés C; Jaguszewski M; Schincariol M; Durán-Cortés MA; Limon U; Gutiérrez-Chico JL
    Cardiol J; 2017; 24(6):700-701. PubMed ID: 29297580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Side branch occlusion after bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation: lessons from optimal coherence tomography.
    Sato K; Panoulas VF; Kawamoto H; Naganuma T; Miyazaki T; Latib A; Colombo A
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan; 8(1 Pt A):116-8. PubMed ID: 25616826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.