These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26945762)

  • 21. Radial scars diagnosed on breast core biopsy: Frequency of atypia and carcinoma on excision and implications for management.
    Donaldson AR; Sieck L; Booth CN; Calhoun BC
    Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():201-207. PubMed ID: 27371970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Photoacoustic imaging of breast cancer: a mini review of system design and image features.
    Nyayapathi N; Xia J
    J Biomed Opt; 2019 Nov; 24(12):1-13. PubMed ID: 31677256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Negative Predictive Value of Ultrasound in Predicting Tumor-Free Margins in Specimen Sonography.
    Naz S; Hafeez S; Hussain Z; Hilal K
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2017 Dec; 27(12):747-750. PubMed ID: 29185399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of age, breast density and volume on breast cancer diagnosis: a retrospective comparison of sensitivity of mammography and ultrasonography in China's rural areas.
    Wang FL; Chen F; Yin H; Xu N; Wu XX; Ma JJ; Gao S; Tang JH; Lu C
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(4):2277-82. PubMed ID: 23725127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optimal b-values for diffusion kurtosis imaging in invasive ductal carcinoma versus ductal carcinoma in situ breast lesions.
    Borlinhas F; Conceição RC; Ferreira HA
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2019 Sep; 42(3):871-885. PubMed ID: 31321627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and magnetic resonance imaging added to digital mammography in women with known breast cancers.
    Kim WH; Chang JM; Moon HG; Yi A; Koo HR; Gweon HM; Moon WK
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1556-64. PubMed ID: 26376882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Systematic development of an abbreviated protocol for screening breast magnetic resonance imaging.
    Strahle DA; Pathak DR; Sierra A; Saha S; Strahle C; Devisetty K
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Apr; 162(2):283-295. PubMed ID: 28138893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Independent value of image fusion in unenhanced breast MRI using diffusion-weighted and morphological T2-weighted images for lesion characterization in patients with recently detected BI-RADS 4/5 x-ray mammography findings.
    Bickelhaupt S; Tesdorff J; Laun FB; Kuder TA; Lederer W; Teiner S; Maier-Hein K; Daniel H; Stieber A; Delorme S; Schlemmer HP
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):562-569. PubMed ID: 27193776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fast 3D Near-infrared breast imaging using indocyanine green for detection and characterization of breast lesions.
    Schneider P; Piper S; Schmitz CH; Schreiter NF; Volkwein N; Lüdemann L; Malzahn U; Poellinger A
    Rofo; 2011 Oct; 183(10):956-63. PubMed ID: 21972043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in ultrasonography-detected breast cancers.
    Nam KJ; Han BK; Ko ES; Choi JS; Ko EY; Jeong DW; Choo KS
    Breast; 2015 Oct; 24(5):649-55. PubMed ID: 26292782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Atypical lobular hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ at core needle biopsy of the breast: An incidental finding or are there characteristic imaging findings?
    Amos B; Chetlen A; Williams N
    Breast Dis; 2016 Jan; 36(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 27177338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impact on the recall rate of digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography in the screening setting. A double reading experience and review of the literature.
    Carbonaro LA; Di Leo G; Clauser P; Trimboli RM; Verardi N; Fedeli MP; Girometti R; Tafà A; Bruscoli P; Saguatti G; Bazzocchi M; Sardanelli F
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):808-14. PubMed ID: 26971428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [40 years of progress in breast imaging].
    De Maulmont C; Cherel P; Ouhioun O; Becette V; Stevens D; Plantet MM; Hagay C
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 2000 Nov; 48(9):801-11. PubMed ID: 11141915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct imaging modality for the diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Brem RF; Floerke AC; Rapelyea JA; Teal C; Kelly T; Mathur V
    Radiology; 2008 Jun; 247(3):651-7. PubMed ID: 18487533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Does breast screening offer a survival benefit? A retrospective comparative study of oncological outcomes of screen-detected and symptomatic early stage breast cancer cases.
    Újhelyi M; Pukancsik D; Kelemen P; Kovács E; Kenessey I; Udvarhelyi N; Bak M; Kovács T; Mátrai Z
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1814-1820. PubMed ID: 27424787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging and X-ray mammography in the measurement of ductal carcinoma in situ: a comparison with histopathology.
    Pickles MD; Gibbs P; Hubbard A; Rahman A; Wieczorek J; Turnbull LW
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Apr; 84(4):603-10. PubMed ID: 25604907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT: Analysis of optimal acquisition time for discrimination of breast lesion malignancy.
    Uhlig J; Fischer U; Surov A; Lotz J; Wienbeck S
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 99():9-16. PubMed ID: 29362157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Method for combined FDG-PET and radiographic imaging of primary breast cancers.
    Adler LP; Weinberg IN; Bradbury MS; Levine EA; Lesko NM; Geisinger KR; Berg WA; Freimanis RI
    Breast J; 2003; 9(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 12752623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Computer-assisted evaluation of mammography images. Initial clinical experiences].
    Sittek H; Herrmann K; Perlet C; Künzer I; Kessler M; Reiser M
    Radiologe; 1997 Aug; 37(8):610-6. PubMed ID: 9411477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ultrasound characteristics of breast carcinoma.
    Cox BA; Kelly KM; Ko P; Hertzog L; Stain SC
    Am Surg; 1998 Oct; 64(10):934-8. PubMed ID: 9764695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.