These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26946068)

  • 1. Cultural differences in visual attention: Implications for distraction processing.
    Amer T; Ngo KW; Hasher L
    Br J Psychol; 2017 May; 108(2):244-258. PubMed ID: 26946068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cultural differences in distraction processing: influence of context at retrieval.
    Ngo KWJ; Amer T; Man L; Hasher L
    Memory; 2018 Nov; 26(10):1396-1401. PubMed ID: 29862880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conceptual processing of distractors by older but not younger adults.
    Amer T; Hasher L
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Dec; 25(12):2252-8. PubMed ID: 25376192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Delighted and distracted: positive affect increases priming for irrelevant information.
    Biss RK; Hasher L
    Emotion; 2011 Dec; 11(6):1474-8. PubMed ID: 21707151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Older adults encode more, not less: evidence for age-related attentional broadening.
    Weeks JC; Hasher L
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2018 Jul; 25(4):576-587. PubMed ID: 28701077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Processing of task-irrelevant natural scenes in social anxiety.
    Moriya J; Tanno Y
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):162-70. PubMed ID: 21696695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Salience drives non-spatial feature repetition effects in cueing tasks.
    Huffman G; Al-Aidroos N; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):212-222. PubMed ID: 27743261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal position priming: memory traces of recent experience bias the allocation of attention in time.
    Yashar A; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1443-56. PubMed ID: 23339347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A window of perception when diverting attention? Enhancing recognition for explicitly presented, unattended, and irrelevant stimuli by target alignment.
    Dewald AD; Sinnett S; Doumas LA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1304-12. PubMed ID: 23276115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The necessity of visual attention to scene categorization: Dissociating "task-relevant" and "task-irrelevant" scene distractors.
    Gronau N; Izoutcheev A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 May; 43(5):954-970. PubMed ID: 28252985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The consequences of processing goal-irrelevant information during the Stroop task.
    Nicosia J; Balota D
    Psychol Aging; 2020 Aug; 35(5):663-675. PubMed ID: 32744849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Instructed fear stimuli bias visual attention.
    Deltomme B; Mertens G; Tibboel H; Braem S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Mar; 184():31-38. PubMed ID: 28889903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Divided attention reduces resistance to distraction at encoding but not retrieval.
    Weeks JC; Hasher L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 27900585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do young adults show conceptual knowledge of previous distractors?
    Amer T; Anderson JAE; Hasher L
    Memory; 2018 Feb; 26(2):251-259. PubMed ID: 28670964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selective attention modulates neural substrates of repetition priming and "implicit" visual memory: suppressions and enhancements revealed by FMRI.
    Vuilleumier P; Schwartz S; Duhoux S; Dolan RJ; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 17(8):1245-60. PubMed ID: 16197681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Memory for recently accessed visual attributes.
    Jiang YV; Shupe JM; Swallow KM; Tan DH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1331-7. PubMed ID: 26844575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Working memory effects in speeded RSVP tasks.
    Gil-Gómez de Liaño B; Potter MC; Rodríguez C
    Psychol Res; 2014 Jan; 78(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 23397260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of sensory modality in age-related distraction: a critical review and a renewed view.
    Guerreiro MJ; Murphy DR; Van Gerven PW
    Psychol Bull; 2010 Nov; 136(6):975-1022. PubMed ID: 21038938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. You see what you have learned. Evidence for an interrelation of associative learning and visual selective attention.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Uengoer M; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Nov; 52(11):1483-97. PubMed ID: 26338030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dissociable mechanisms underlying individual differences in visual working memory capacity.
    Gulbinaite R; Johnson A; de Jong R; Morey CC; van Rijn H
    Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 99():197-206. PubMed ID: 24878830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.