171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26946089)
1. An investigation of the impact of left-censored soil contamination data on the uncertainty of descriptive statistical parameters.
Shoari N; Dubé JS
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Oct; 35(10):2623-2631. PubMed ID: 26946089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating the mean and standard deviation of environmental data with below detection limit observations: Considering highly skewed data and model misspecification.
Shoari N; Dubé JS; Chenouri S
Chemosphere; 2015 Nov; 138():599-608. PubMed ID: 26210025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for censored data sets and application to air toxic emission factors.
Zhao Y; Frey HC
Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):1019-34. PubMed ID: 15357825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of statistical treatments of left-censored environmental data using coincident uncensored data sets: I. Summary statistics.
Antweiler RC; Taylor HE
Environ Sci Technol; 2008 May; 42(10):3732-8. PubMed ID: 18546715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of methods for managing censored results when calculating the geometric mean.
Mikkonen HG; Clarke BO; Dasika R; Wallis CJ; Reichman SM
Chemosphere; 2018 Jan; 191():412-416. PubMed ID: 29049962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating Left-Censored Data Through Substitution, Parametric, Semi-parametric, and Nonparametric Methods: A Simulation Study.
Tekindal MA; Erdoğan BD; Yavuz Y
Interdiscip Sci; 2017 Jun; 9(2):153-172. PubMed ID: 26590921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimating correlation with multiply censored data arising from the adjustment of singly censored data.
Newton E; Rudel R
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Jan; 41(1):221-8. PubMed ID: 17265951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Statistical Techniques to Analyze Pesticide Data Program Food Residue Observations.
Szarka AZ; Hayworth CG; Ramanarayanan TS; Joseph RSI
J Agric Food Chem; 2018 Jul; 66(27):7165-7171. PubMed ID: 29902006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of methods for analyzing left-censored occupational exposure data.
Huynh T; Ramachandran G; Banerjee S; Monteiro J; Stenzel M; Sandler DP; Engel LS; Kwok RK; Blair A; Stewart PA
Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Nov; 58(9):1126-42. PubMed ID: 25261453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Toward improved analysis of concentration data: Embracing nondetects.
Shoari N; Dubé JS
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2018 Mar; 37(3):643-656. PubMed ID: 29168890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methods for Handling Left-Censored Data in Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment.
Canales RA; Wilson AM; Pearce-Walker JI; Verhougstraete MP; Reynolds KA
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Oct; 84(20):. PubMed ID: 30120116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of maximum likelihood procedures to estimate left censored observations.
Jain RB; Caudill SP; Wang RY; Monsell E
Anal Chem; 2008 Feb; 80(4):1124-32. PubMed ID: 18197633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of mixed effects models for characterizing contaminated sites.
Shoari N; Dubé JS
Chemosphere; 2017 Jan; 166():380-388. PubMed ID: 27705825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An accurate substitution method for analyzing censored data.
Ganser GH; Hewett P
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Apr; 7(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 20169489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating population distributions when some data are below a limit of detection by using a reverse Kaplan-Meier estimator.
Gillespie BW; Chen Q; Reichert H; Franzblau A; Hedgeman E; Lepkowski J; Adriaens P; Demond A; Luksemburg W; Garabrant DH
Epidemiology; 2010 Jul; 21 Suppl 4():S64-70. PubMed ID: 20386104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data.
Hewett P; Ganser GH
Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Oct; 51(7):611-32. PubMed ID: 17940277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Soil sampling strategies for site assessments in petroleum-contaminated areas.
Kim G; Chowdhury S; Lin YM; Lu CJ
Environ Geochem Health; 2017 Apr; 39(2):293-305. PubMed ID: 27995353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bivariate Left-Censored Measurements in Biomonitoring: A Bayesian Model for the Determination of Biological Limit Values Based on Occupational Exposure Limits.
Martin Remy A; Wild P
Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Jun; 61(5):515-527. PubMed ID: 28475797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimation of exposure distribution adjusting for association between exposure level and detection limit.
Yang Y; Shelton BJ; Tucker TT; Li L; Kryscio R; Chen L
Stat Med; 2017 Aug; 36(18):2935-2946. PubMed ID: 28513091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Critical evaluation of soil contamination assessment methods for trace metals.
Desaules A
Sci Total Environ; 2012 Jun; 426():120-31. PubMed ID: 22542230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
