These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26946380)

  • 1. When Absence of Evidence Is Evidence of Absence: Rational Inferences From Absent Data.
    Hsu AS; Horng A; Griffiths TL; Chater N
    Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41 Suppl 5():1155-1167. PubMed ID: 26946380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analogical and category-based inference: a theoretical integration with Bayesian causal models.
    Holyoak KJ; Lee HS; Lu H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 Nov; 139(4):702-27. PubMed ID: 21038985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feature inference with uncertain categorization: Re-assessing Anderson's rational model.
    Konovalova E; Le Mens G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1666-1681. PubMed ID: 28924732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inferring mass in complex scenes by mental simulation.
    Hamrick JB; Battaglia PW; Griffiths TL; Tenenbaum JB
    Cognition; 2016 Dec; 157():61-76. PubMed ID: 27592412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monitoring of learning at the category level when learning a natural concept: will task experience improve its resolution?
    Tauber SK; Dunlosky J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Feb; 155():8-18. PubMed ID: 25528538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Working memory supports inference learning just like classification learning.
    Craig S; Lewandowsky S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Aug; 66(8):1493-503. PubMed ID: 23931655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Win-Stay, Lose-Sample: a simple sequential algorithm for approximating Bayesian inference.
    Bonawitz E; Denison S; Gopnik A; Griffiths TL
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 Nov; 74():35-65. PubMed ID: 25086501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From mere coincidences to meaningful discoveries.
    Griffiths TL; Tenenbaum JB
    Cognition; 2007 May; 103(2):180-226. PubMed ID: 16678145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of virtual sample size on confidence and causal-strength judgments.
    Liljeholm M; Cheng PW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):157-72. PubMed ID: 19210088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inferences from memory: strategy- and exemplar-based judgment models compared.
    Persson M; Rieskamp J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 18986638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Causal learning and inference as a rational process: the new synthesis.
    Holyoak KJ; Cheng PW
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2011; 62():135-63. PubMed ID: 21126179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do people reason rationally about causally related events? Markov violations, weak inferences, and failures of explaining away.
    Rottman BM; Hastie R
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Jun; 87():88-134. PubMed ID: 27261539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surprising rationality in probability judgment: Assessing two competing models.
    Costello F; Watts P; Fisher C
    Cognition; 2018 Jan; 170():280-297. PubMed ID: 29096329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Causal inference and the hierarchical structure of experience.
    Johnson SG; Keil FC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Dec; 143(6):2223-41. PubMed ID: 25347533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of functional form in causal-based categorization.
    Rehder B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):670-92. PubMed ID: 25111739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Knowledge matters: how children evaluate the reliability of testimony as a process of rational inference.
    Sobel DM; Kushnir T
    Psychol Rev; 2013 Oct; 120(4):779-97. PubMed ID: 24015954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Epistemic trust: modeling children's reasoning about others' knowledge and intent.
    Shafto P; Eaves B; Navarro DJ; Perfors A
    Dev Sci; 2012 May; 15(3):436-47. PubMed ID: 22490183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Infants consider both the sample and the sampling process in inductive generalization.
    Gweon H; Tenenbaum JB; Schulz LE
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 May; 107(20):9066-71. PubMed ID: 20435914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. My imagination versus your feelings: can personal affective forecasts be improved by knowing other peoples' emotions?
    Walsh E; Ayton P
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Dec; 15(4):351-60. PubMed ID: 20025420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Children's representation of coincidence.
    Cao Q; Feigenson L
    Cognition; 2024 Sep; 250():105854. PubMed ID: 38941764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.