These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26946920)

  • 1. Completely digital approach to an ovate pontic.
    Lee JH; Lee CH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jun; 115(6):792-4. PubMed ID: 26946920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A simplified technique for recording an implant-supported ovate pontic site in the esthetic zone.
    Raigrodski AJ; Schwedhelm ER; Chen YW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Feb; 111(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 24210731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Completely digital approach to fabricating a crown under an existing partial removable dental prosthesis by using an intraoral digital scanner in a single appointment.
    Lee JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jun; 115(6):668-71. PubMed ID: 26809222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direct method of registering periimplant soft tissue forms for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
    Hegyi KE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Mar; 115(3):267-70. PubMed ID: 26548881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An alternative multiple pontic design for a fixed implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del Castillo R; Ercoli C; Delgado JC; Alcaraz J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Sep; 106(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 21889007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Precise Reproduction of Soft Tissue Structure around the Pontic Area Using Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing.
    Lee H; Paek J; Noh K; Kwon KR
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):216-218. PubMed ID: 28833823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A stereolithographic resin pattern for evaluating the framework, altered cast partial removable dental prosthesis impression, and maxillomandibular relationship record in a single appointment.
    Lee JH; Lee CH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Nov; 114(5):625-6. PubMed ID: 26254975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of a scannable impression coping and digital impression technique to fabricate a customized anatomic abutment and zirconia restoration in the esthetic zone.
    Lin WS; Harris BT; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 23522368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A review of implant abutments--abutment classification to aid prosthetic selection.
    Karunagaran S; Paprocki GJ; Wicks R; Markose S
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2013; 93(2):18-23; quiz 23-4. PubMed ID: 24611217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of selective open architecture in digital restoration fabrication.
    Schroder BK; Brown C
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010; 31 Spec No 4():15-22. PubMed ID: 21049825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital scanning to aid guiding plane and rest seat preparations for removable partial dentures.
    Loney RW; Lee CJ; Michaud PL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Nov; 118(5):581-583. PubMed ID: 28449866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Photogrammetric method to measure the discrepancy between clinical and software-designed positions of implants.
    Rivara F; Lumetti S; Calciolari E; Toffoli A; Forlani G; Manfredi E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jun; 115(6):703-11. PubMed ID: 26794693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of CAD/CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses.
    de França DG; Morais MH; das Neves FD; Barbosa GA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 25277028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods.
    Cho SH; Schaefer O; Thompson GA; Guentsch A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 25682531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Strategies for integrating new restorative materials with digital technology and sound restorative principles.
    Roberts M
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Jan; 34(1):52-7, 59. PubMed ID: 23550332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of digital diagnostic impression, virtual planning, and computer-guided implant surgery for a CAD/CAM-fabricated, implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: a clinical report.
    Stapleton BM; Lin WS; Ntounis A; Harris BT; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):402-8. PubMed ID: 24831749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The application of rapid prototyping in prosthodontics.
    Sun J; Zhang FQ
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):641-4. PubMed ID: 22823471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of the impression replica technique.
    Falk A; Vult von Steyern P; Fransson H; Thorén MM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(2):179-80. PubMed ID: 25822305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of digital data acquisition and CAD/CAM technology for the fabrication of a fixed complete dental prosthesis on dental implants.
    Lin WS; Harris BT; Zandinejad A; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jan; 111(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 24189115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer-generated abutments using a coded healing abutment: a two year preliminary report.
    Vafiadis DC
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 19(7):443-8. PubMed ID: 17929687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.