367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2694713)
1. Care of pressure sores: a controlled study of the use of a hydrocolloid dressing compared with wet saline gauze compresses.
Alm A; Hornmark AM; Fall PA; Linder L; Bergstrand B; Ehrnebo M; Madsen SM; Setterberg G
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1989; 149():1-10. PubMed ID: 2694713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hydrocolloid versus saline-gauze dressings in treating pressure ulcers: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Xakellis GC; Chrischilles EA
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 May; 73(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 1580775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pressure ulcers--randomised controlled trial comparing hydrocolloid and saline gauze dressings.
Chang KW; Alsagoff S; Ong KT; Sim PH
Med J Malaysia; 1998 Dec; 53(4):428-31. PubMed ID: 10971989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two methods of managing pressure ulcers.
Colwell JC; Foreman MD; Trotter JP
Decubitus; 1993 Jul; 6(4):28-36. PubMed ID: 8297488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized clinical study comparing a hydrocellular dressing to a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of pressure ulcers.
Seeley J; Jensen JL; Hutcherson J
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Jun; 45(6):39-44, 46-7. PubMed ID: 10655861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.
Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment of chronic leg ulcers with a hydrocolloid dressing.
Gamborg Nielsen P; Munk Madsen S; Strömberg L
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1989; 152():1-12. PubMed ID: 2618526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective, randomized clinical trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of a modern foam dressing versus a traditional saline gauze dressing in the treatment of stage II pressure ulcers.
Payne WG; Posnett J; Alvarez O; Brown-Etris M; Jameson G; Wolcott R; Dharma H; Hartwell S; Ochs D
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 Feb; 55(2):50-5. PubMed ID: 19246785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hydrocolloid dressing versus tulle gauze in the treatment of abrasions in cyclists.
Hermans MH
Int J Sports Med; 1991 Dec; 12(6):581-4. PubMed ID: 1797702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biofilm hydrogel dressing: a clinical evaluation in the treatment of pressure sores.
Darkovich SL; Brown-Etris M; Spencer M
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1990; 29():47-60. PubMed ID: 2202317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective, randomized, multisite clinical evaluation of a transparent absorbent acrylic dressing and a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of Stage II and shallow Stage III pressure ulcers.
Brown-Etris M; Milne C; Orsted H; Gates JL; Netsch D; Punchello M; Couture N; Albert M; Attrell E; Freyberg J
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Apr; 21(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 18385577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of hydrocolloid dressings on healing by second intention after excision of pilonidal sinus.
Viciano V; Castera JE; Medrano J; Aguiló J; Torro J; Botella MG; Toldrá N
Eur J Surg; 2000 Mar; 166(3):229-32. PubMed ID: 10755338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Managing sacral pressure ulcers with hydrocolloid dressings: results of a controlled, clinical study.
Day A; Dombranski S; Farkas C; Foster C; Godin J; Moody M; Morrison M; Tamer C
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Mar; 41(2):52-4, 56, 58 passim. PubMed ID: 7598778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of cadexomer iodine paste in the treatment of venous leg ulcers compared with hydrocolloid dressing and paraffin gauze dressing. Cadexomer Iodine Study Group.
Hansson C
Int J Dermatol; 1998 May; 37(5):390-6. PubMed ID: 9620490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a collagen-alginate wound dressing in the management of diabetic foot ulcers.
Donaghue VM; Chrzan JS; Rosenblum BI; Giurini JM; Habershaw GM; Veves A
Adv Wound Care; 1998; 11(3):114-9. PubMed ID: 9729942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A cost-effectiveness study of leg ulcer treatment in primary care. Comparison of saline-gauze and hydrocolloid treatment in a prospective, randomized study.
Ohlsson P; Larsson K; Lindholm C; Möller M
Scand J Prim Health Care; 1994 Dec; 12(4):295-9. PubMed ID: 7863149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acemannan hydrogel dressing versus saline dressing for pressure ulcers. A randomized, controlled trial.
Thomas DR; Goode PS; LaMaster K; Tennyson T
Adv Wound Care; 1998 Oct; 11(6):273-6. PubMed ID: 10326343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of venous ulcer care: results of a longitudinal study.
Kerstein MD; Gahtan V
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Jun; 46(6):22-6, 28-9. PubMed ID: 11029932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Leg ulcer treatment in hospital and primary care in Sweden: cost-effective care and quality of life.
Lindholm C
Adv Wound Care; 1995; 8(5):48, 50, 52. PubMed ID: 7582337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Occlusive dressing or active product?].
Fairbrother JE
Soins Chir; 1989 May; (99):42-4. PubMed ID: 2749085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
