268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26947462)
21. Outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cone for reconstruction of severe bone loss at the proximal tibia.
Jensen CL; Winther N; Schrøder HM; Petersen MM
Knee; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1233-7. PubMed ID: 25212989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Management of the bone loss by metaphyseal sleeves in primary and revision knee arthroplasty: clinical experience and outcome after forty three cases.
Gill UN; Ahmed N; Noor SS; Memon IA; Memon ZA
Int Orthop; 2020 Nov; 44(11):2315-2320. PubMed ID: 32556384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Metaphyseal Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Provide Reliable Fixation and Excellent Medium to Long-Term Implant Survivorship.
Bloch BV; Shannak OA; Palan J; Phillips JRA; James PJ
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Feb; 35(2):495-499. PubMed ID: 31606290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Highly Porous Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Series.
Patel NK; Kim EG; Chughtai M; Khlopas A; Elmallah RD; Harwin SF; Delanois RE; Mont MA
J Knee Surg; 2016 Nov; 29(8):614-620. PubMed ID: 27711948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Metaphyseal Fixation Using Highly Porous Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum Two Year Follow Up Study.
Denehy KM; Abhari S; Krebs VE; Higuera-Rueda CA; Samuel LT; Sultan AA; Mont MA; Malkani AL
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Oct; 34(10):2439-2443. PubMed ID: 31000405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Direct, Cementless, Metaphyseal Fixation in Knee Revision Arthroplasty With Sleeves-Short-Term Results.
Graichen H; Scior W; Strauch M
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Dec; 30(12):2256-9. PubMed ID: 26209287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Metaphyseal Sleeves for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Good Short-Term Outcomes.
Bugler KE; Maheshwari R; Ahmed I; Brenkel IJ; Walmsley PJ
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Nov; 30(11):1990-4. PubMed ID: 26115984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical results of unicompartmental arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis using a tibial component with screw fixation.
Koshino T; Sato K; Umemoto Y; Akamatsu Y; Kumagai K; Saito T
Int Orthop; 2015 Jun; 39(6):1085-91. PubMed ID: 25341949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Early results of the use of tantalum femoral cones for revision total knee arthroplasty.
Howard JL; Kudera J; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Mar; 93(5):478-84. PubMed ID: 21368080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Are Stems Redundant in Times of Metaphyseal Sleeve Fixation?
Scior W; Chanda D; Graichen H
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Oct; 34(10):2444-2448. PubMed ID: 31301910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Short-term effectiveness of revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal Sleeve and MBT implant].
Guo L; Du Y; Zhang M; Sun J; Jin Z; Peng Y; Shen J; Zhou Y
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 33(3):302-306. PubMed ID: 30874385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Osteointegrative Sleeves for Metaphyseal Defect Augmentation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Clinical and Radiological 5-Year Follow-Up.
Wirries N; Winnecken HJ; Lewinski GV; Windhagen H; Skutek M
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Sep; 34(9):2022-2029. PubMed ID: 31079992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Metaphyseal Metal Sleeves for Reconstruction of Severe Knee Bone Defects: Excellent Survival Rate at a Mean Follow-Up of 6.4 Years.
Liu Y; Zhang Y; Shen J; Zhang B; Ma H; Zhou Y
Orthop Surg; 2023 Dec; 15(12):3202-3208. PubMed ID: 37873568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Total knee arthroplasty revision with trabecular tantalum cones: Preliminary retrospective study of 51 patients from two centres with a minimal 2-year follow-up.
Girerd D; Parratte S; Lunebourg A; Boureau F; Ollivier M; Pasquier G; Putman S; Migaud H; Argenson JN
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Jun; 102(4):429-33. PubMed ID: 27052939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. Surgical technique.
Meneghini RM; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Mar; 91 Suppl 2 Pt 1():131-8. PubMed ID: 19255205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impaction grafting for bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Lotke PA; Carolan GF; Puri N
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 May; 446():99-103. PubMed ID: 16672878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Complex Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Long-Term Outcomes.
Martin JR; Beahrs TR; Stuhlman CR; Trousdale RT
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Sep; 98(17):1459-70. PubMed ID: 27605690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Do Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones Improve Outcomes in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty?
Bohl DD; Brown NM; McDowell MA; Levine BR; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG; Della Valle CJ
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jan; 33(1):171-177. PubMed ID: 28844630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Use of structural allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty in knees with severe tibial bone loss.
Engh GA; Ammeen DJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Dec; 89(12):2640-7. PubMed ID: 18056496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Midterm Results of Porous Tantalum Femoral Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Potter GD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Aug; 98(15):1286-91. PubMed ID: 27489319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
