These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26947619)

  • 1. Exploiting temporal predictability: Event-related potential correlates of task-supportive temporal cue processing in auditory distraction.
    Volosin M; Grimm S; Horváth J
    Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():120-31. PubMed ID: 26947619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distraction in a continuous-stimulation detection task.
    Horváth J; Winkler I
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Mar; 83(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 20064580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Task difficulty modulates voluntary attention allocation, but not distraction in an auditory distraction paradigm.
    Volosin M; Horváth J
    Brain Res; 2020 Jan; 1727():146565. PubMed ID: 31765629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Probing the sensory effects of involuntary attention change by ERPs to auditory transients.
    Horváth J
    Psychophysiology; 2014 May; 51(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 24611948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. To switch or not to switch: brain potential indices of attentional control after task-relevant and task-irrelevant changes of stimulus features.
    Hölig C; Berti S
    Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 1345():164-75. PubMed ID: 20580694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of explicit knowledge and predictability on auditory distraction and target performance.
    Max C; Widmann A; Schröger E; Sussman E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Nov; 98(2 Pt 1):174-81. PubMed ID: 26386396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implicit variations of temporal predictability: Shaping the neural oscillatory and behavioural response.
    Herbst SK; Obleser J
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jul; 101():141-152. PubMed ID: 28527912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age-related differences in distraction and reorientation in an auditory task.
    Horváth J; Czigler I; Birkás E; Winkler I; Gervai J
    Neurobiol Aging; 2009 Jul; 30(7):1157-72. PubMed ID: 18023507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction.
    Muller-Gass A; Schröger E
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1136(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 17223092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preparation interval and cue utilization in the prevention of distraction.
    Horváth J
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 231(2):179-90. PubMed ID: 23975153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal attention is involved in the enhancement of attentional capture with task difficulty: an event-related brain potential study.
    Sugimoto F; Kimura M; Takeda Y; Katayama J
    Neuroreport; 2017 Aug; 28(12):755-759. PubMed ID: 28682830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Knowledge of sequence structure prevents auditory distraction: an ERP study.
    Volosin M; Horváth J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Jun; 92(3):93-8. PubMed ID: 24657900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attention-dependent sound offset-related brain potentials.
    Horváth J
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):663-77. PubMed ID: 26757414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feature binding in auditory modality requires attention as indexed by mismatch negativity and N2b in an active discrimination task.
    Lazarev IE; Sayfulina KE; Chernysheva EG; Bryzgalov DV; Chernyshev BV
    Neuroreport; 2018 Mar; 29(4):308-313. PubMed ID: 29293173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Examining task-dependencies of different attentional processes as reflected in the P3a and reorienting negativity components of the human event-related brain potential.
    Munka L; Berti S
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Apr; 396(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 16356637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task-optimal auditory attention set restored as fast in older as in younger adults after distraction.
    Volosin M; Gaál ZA; Horváth J
    Biol Psychol; 2017 May; 126():71-81. PubMed ID: 28411034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of the P3 and CNV components in voluntary and automatic temporal orienting: A high spatial-resolution ERP study.
    Mento G
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Dec; 107():31-40. PubMed ID: 29109036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preventing distraction by probabilistic cueing.
    Horváth J; Bendixen A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Mar; 83(3):342-7. PubMed ID: 22178734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.