These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26947768)

  • 1. Repeated significance tests of linear combinations of sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic biomarker.
    Wu M; Shu Y; Li Z; Liu A
    Stat Med; 2016 Aug; 35(19):3397-412. PubMed ID: 26947768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sequential evaluation of a medical diagnostic test with binary outcomes.
    Shu Y; Liu A; Li Z
    Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(24):4416-27. PubMed ID: 17539044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of inferential procedures for adaptive clinical trial designs with pre-specified rules for modifying the sample size.
    Levin GP; Emerson SC; Emerson SS
    Biometrics; 2014 Sep; 70(3):556-67. PubMed ID: 24766094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficient group sequential designs when there are several effect sizes under consideration.
    Jennison C; Turnbull BW
    Stat Med; 2006 Mar; 25(6):917-32. PubMed ID: 16220524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Bayesian sequential design with binary outcome.
    Zhu H; Yu Q; Mercante DE
    Pharm Stat; 2017 May; 16(3):192-200. PubMed ID: 28251815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reporting bias in imaging: higher accuracy is linked to faster publication.
    Sharifabadi AD; Korevaar DA; McGrath TA; van Es N; Frank RA; Cherpak L; Dang W; Salameh JP; Nguyen F; Stanley C; McInnes MDF
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Sep; 28(9):3632-3639. PubMed ID: 29564596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Group sequential comparison of positive predictive value curves for correlated biomarker data.
    Ye X; Tang LL; Zhu X
    Stat Med; 2020 May; 39(12):1732-1745. PubMed ID: 32074391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal adaptive two-stage designs for early phase II clinical trials.
    Shan G; Wilding GE; Hutson AD; Gerstenberger S
    Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(8):1257-66. PubMed ID: 26526165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics.
    Hajian-Tilaki K
    J Biomed Inform; 2014 Apr; 48():193-204. PubMed ID: 24582925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variable criteria sequential stopping rule: Validity and power with repeated measures ANOVA, multiple correlation, MANOVA and relation to Chi-square distribution.
    Fitts DA
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Oct; 50(5):1988-2003. PubMed ID: 28936614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Confidence interval estimation for sensitivity at a fixed level of specificity for combined biomarkers.
    Tian L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013 May; 23(3):499-512. PubMed ID: 23611191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time to publication among completed diagnostic accuracy studies: associated with reported accuracy estimates.
    Korevaar DA; van Es N; Zwinderman AH; Cohen JF; Bossuyt PM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jun; 16():68. PubMed ID: 27267602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptive design and estimation in randomized clinical trials with correlated observations.
    Yin G; Shen Y
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):362-9. PubMed ID: 16011682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stepwise two-stage sample size adaptation.
    Wan H; Ellenberg SS; Anderson KM
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 25252082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reducing sample sizes in genome scans: group sequential study designs with futility stops.
    König IR; Schäfer H; Ziegler A; Müller HH
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Dec; 25(4):339-49. PubMed ID: 14639703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of a parameter and its exact confidence interval following sequential sample size reestimation trials.
    Cheng Y; Shen Y
    Biometrics; 2004 Dec; 60(4):910-8. PubMed ID: 15606411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sample size calculation and re-estimation based on the prevalence in a single-arm confirmatory diagnostic accuracy study.
    Stark M; Zapf A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2958-2971. PubMed ID: 32299298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design and inference for 3-stage bioequivalence testing with serial sampling data.
    Yan F; Zhu H; Liu J; Jiang L; Huang X
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Sep; 17(5):458-476. PubMed ID: 29726096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal spending functions for asymmetric group sequential designs.
    Anderson KM
    Biom J; 2007 Jun; 49(3):337-45. PubMed ID: 17623339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-stage biomarker panel study and estimation allowing early termination for futility.
    Zhao S; Zheng Y; Prentice RL; Feng Z
    Biostatistics; 2015 Oct; 16(4):799-812. PubMed ID: 25964662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.