These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26948122)

  • 1. Mini-review: Prediction errors, attention and associative learning.
    Holland PC; Schiffino FL
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2016 May; 131():207-15. PubMed ID: 26948122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Posterior parietal cortex is critical for the encoding, consolidation, and retrieval of a memory that guides attention for learning.
    Schiffino FL; Zhou V; Holland PC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2014 Feb; 39(4):640-9. PubMed ID: 24236913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Secondary visual cortex is critical to the expression of surprise-induced enhancements in cue associability in rats.
    Schiffino FL; Holland PC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Jul; 44(2):1870-7. PubMed ID: 27225533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dorsolateral striatum is critical for the expression of surprise-induced enhancements in cue associability.
    Asem JS; Schiffino FL; Holland PC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 42(5):2203-13. PubMed ID: 26108257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Blocking and associability change.
    Jones PM; Haselgrove M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Jul; 39(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 23668185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of amygdala lesions on overexpectation phenomena in food cup approach and autoshaping procedures.
    Holland PC
    Behav Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 130(4):357-75. PubMed ID: 27176564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The conditions that promote fear learning: prediction error and Pavlovian fear conditioning.
    Li SS; McNally GP
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2014 Feb; 108():14-21. PubMed ID: 23684989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of amygdala central nucleus in feature negative discriminations.
    Holland PC
    Behav Neurosci; 2012 Oct; 126(5):670-80. PubMed ID: 22889308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consolidation of altered associability information by amygdala central nucleus.
    Schiffino FL; Holland PC
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2016 Sep; 133():204-213. PubMed ID: 27427328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interpreting patterns of brain activation in human fear conditioning with an attentional-associative learning model.
    Dunsmoor J; Schmajuk N
    Behav Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 123(4):851-5. PubMed ID: 19634945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pupil dilation indicates the coding of past prediction errors: Evidence for attentional learning theory.
    Koenig S; Uengoer M; Lachnit H
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Apr; 55(4):. PubMed ID: 29023832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Separate amygdala subregions signal surprise and predictiveness during associative fear learning in humans.
    Boll S; Gamer M; Gluth S; Finsterbusch J; Büchel C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2013 Mar; 37(5):758-67. PubMed ID: 23278978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inhibitory learning tests of conditioned stimulus associability in rats with lesions of the amygdala central nucleus.
    Holland PC; Chik Y; Zhang Q
    Behav Neurosci; 2001 Oct; 115(5):1154-8. PubMed ID: 11584928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What's elementary about associative learning?
    Wasserman EA; Miller RR
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1997; 48():573-607. PubMed ID: 9046569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of associative history in models of associative learning: a selective review and a hybrid model.
    Le Pelley ME
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Jul; 57(3):193-243. PubMed ID: 15204108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Blocking of potentiation of latent inhibition.
    Hall G; Rodriguez G
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jan; 37(1):127-31. PubMed ID: 20822295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Overshadowing and associability change.
    Jones PM; Haselgrove M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jul; 37(3):287-99. PubMed ID: 21500931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of basolateral amygdala lesions on unblocking.
    Chang SE; McDannald MA; Wheeler DS; Holland PC
    Behav Neurosci; 2012 Apr; 126(2):279-89. PubMed ID: 22448857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Purkinje cell activity during classical conditioning with different conditional stimuli explains central tenet of Rescorla–Wagner model [corrected].
    Rasmussen A; Zucca R; Johansson F; Jirenhed DA; Hesslow G
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Nov; 112(45):14060-5. PubMed ID: 26504227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hippocampal lesions disrupt decrements but not increments in conditioned stimulus processing.
    Han JS; Gallagher M; Holland P
    J Neurosci; 1995 Nov; 15(11):7323-9. PubMed ID: 7472486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.