These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26948122)

  • 21. Restoration of stimulus associability, electrodermal activity, and processing resource allocation.
    Packer JS; Siddle DA; Tipp C
    Biol Psychol; 1989 Apr; 28(2):105-21. PubMed ID: 2775800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attention and associative learning in humans: An integrative review.
    Le Pelley ME; Mitchell CJ; Beesley T; George DN; Wills AJ
    Psychol Bull; 2016 Oct; 142(10):1111-1140. PubMed ID: 27504933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Different roles for amygdala central nucleus and substantia innominata in the surprise-induced enhancement of learning.
    Holland PC; Gallagher M
    J Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 26(14):3791-7. PubMed ID: 16597732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Learned changes in outcome associability.
    Quigley MC; Eatherington CJ; Haselgrove M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):209-221. PubMed ID: 28627301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Forebrain monoamines and associative learning: II. Superconditioning/unblocking.
    Rickert EJ; Lorden JF
    Behav Brain Res; 1983 Aug; 9(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 6882524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Surprise! Neural correlates of Pearce-Hall and Rescorla-Wagner coexist within the brain.
    Roesch MR; Esber GR; Li J; Daw ND; Schoenbaum G
    Eur J Neurosci; 2012 Apr; 35(7):1190-200. PubMed ID: 22487047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Enhanced unblocking from sustained post-trial surprise.
    Haselgrove M; Tam SK; Jones PM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Oct; 39(4):311-22. PubMed ID: 23688285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Neurocomputational correlates of learned irrelevance in humans.
    Aberg KC; Kramer EE; Schwartz S
    Neuroimage; 2020 Jun; 213():116719. PubMed ID: 32156624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Spontaneous recovery from overexpectation in an insect.
    Terao K; Matsumoto Y; Álvarez B; Mizunami M
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):9827. PubMed ID: 35701655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The development and present status of the SOP model of associative learning.
    Vogel EH; Ponce FP; Wagner AR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):346-374. PubMed ID: 29741452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A theoretical note in interpretation of the "redundancy effect" in associative learning.
    Vogel EH; Wagner AR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2017 Jan; 43(1):119-125. PubMed ID: 27786508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An examination of changes in behavioral control when stimuli with different associative histories are conditioned in compound.
    Fam J; Westbrook RF; Holmes NM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(3):205-218. PubMed ID: 28481560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Overshadowing and associability change: examining the contribution of differential stimulus exposure.
    Jones PM; Haselgrove M
    Learn Behav; 2013 Mar; 41(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 22956344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Summation of reinforcement rates when conditioned stimuli are presented in compound.
    Andrew BJ; Harris JA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Oct; 37(4):385-93. PubMed ID: 21787099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Attentional and error-correcting associative mechanisms in classical conditioning.
    Schmajuk N
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Jul; 35(3):407-18. PubMed ID: 19594285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Associative change in Pavlovian conditioning: A reappraisal.
    Honey RC; Dwyer DM; Iliescu AF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2022 Oct; 48(4):281-294. PubMed ID: 35549396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Selecting danger signals: dissociable roles of nucleus accumbens shell and core glutamate in predictive fear learning.
    Li SS; McNally GP
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Jun; 41(12):1515-23. PubMed ID: 25851204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Value-driven attention and associative learning models: a computational simulation analysis.
    Jeong JH; Ju J; Kim S; Choi JS; Cho YS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Oct; 30(5):1689-1706. PubMed ID: 37145388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The basolateral amygdala is necessary for negative prediction errors to enhance cue salience, but not to produce conditioned inhibition.
    Esber GR; Holland PC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2014 Nov; 40(9):3328-37. PubMed ID: 25135841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. From Pavlov to pain: How predictability affects the anticipation and processing of visceral pain in a fear conditioning paradigm.
    Labrenz F; Icenhour A; Schlamann M; Forsting M; Bingel U; Elsenbruch S
    Neuroimage; 2016 Apr; 130():104-114. PubMed ID: 26854560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.