175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26949239)
21. An investigation of mandibular morphology in subjects with different vertical facial growth patterns.
Eröz UB; Ceylan I; Aydemir S
Aust Orthod J; 2000 Mar; 16(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 11201956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Relationships between the size and spatial morphology of human masseter and medial pterygoid muscles, the craniofacial skeleton, and jaw biomechanics.
Hannam AG; Wood WW
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1989 Dec; 80(4):429-45. PubMed ID: 2603948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A longitudinal cephalometric study of transverse and vertical craniofacial growth.
Snodell SF; Nanda RS; Currier GF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Nov; 104(5):471-83. PubMed ID: 8237899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of Intercanine and Intermolar Width Between Cleft Lip Palate and Normal Class I Occlusion Group.
Wahaj A; Ahmed I
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Nov; 25(11):811-4. PubMed ID: 26577967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prediction of transverse maxillary dimension using orthodontic models.
de Oliveira MA; Pereira MD; Hino CT; Campaner AB; Scanavini MA; Ferreira LM
J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 19(6):1465-71. PubMed ID: 19098534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of dental arch and mandibular-maxillary base widths between true and pseudo-Class III malocclusions.
Akan B; Veli I
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Feb; 151(2):317-323. PubMed ID: 28153161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Application of Pont's Index to a Jordanian population.
Al-Omari IK; Duaibis RB; Al-Bitar ZB
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):627-31. PubMed ID: 17971353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Masseter muscle thickness as a predictive variable in treatment outcome of the twin-block appliance and masseteric thickness changes during treatment.
Kiliaridis S; Mills CM; Antonarakis GS
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2010 Nov; 13(4):203-13. PubMed ID: 21040463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Craniofacial morphological characteristics of Chinese adults with normal occlusion and different skeletal divergence.
Xiao D; Gao H; Ren Y
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 20841315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cephalometric and occlusal changes following maxillary expansion and protraction.
Ngan P; Yiu C; Hu A; Hägg U; Wei SH; Gunel E
Eur J Orthod; 1998 Jun; 20(3):237-54. PubMed ID: 9699402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Maxillofacial morphology and masseter muscle thickness in adults.
Kubota M; Nakano H; Sanjo I; Satoh K; Sanjo T; Kamegai T; Ishikawa F
Eur J Orthod; 1998 Oct; 20(5):535-42. PubMed ID: 9825556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Arch width changes in extraction and nonextraction treatment in class I patients.
Aksu M; Kocadereli I
Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):948-52. PubMed ID: 16448236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Masticatory muscle function and transverse dentofacial growth.
Katsaros C
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2001; (151):1-47. PubMed ID: 11803645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Alteration of masticatory electromyographic activity and stability of orthognathic surgery in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion.
Ko EW; Huang CS; Lo LJ; Chen YR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 71(7):1249-60. PubMed ID: 23562358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ultrasonographic evaluation of changes in the thickness, width, elasticity index and echogenic pattern of the masseter muscle after mandibular set-back surgery.
Akbulut N; Gökçe E; Akbulut S; Şen E; Altan A; Balel Y
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Dec; 124(6S2):101567. PubMed ID: 37480991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mathematical beta function formulation for maxillary arch form prediction in normal occlusion population.
Mina M; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Tehranchi A; Nouri M; Younessian F
Odontology; 2017 Apr; 105(2):229-236. PubMed ID: 27167385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of maxillary sinus volume and dimensions in different vertical face growth patterns: a study of cone-beam computed tomography.
Okşayan R; Sökücü O; Yeşildal S
Acta Odontol Scand; 2017 Jul; 75(5):345-349. PubMed ID: 28376676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Masseter thickness measured by ultrasonography of 50 young healthy adults in relation to facial morphology].
Zhao JZ; Dai Q; Lai QS
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2001 Feb; 23(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 12905821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dental arch widths and mandibular-maxillary base width in Class III malocclusions with low, average and high MP-SN angles.
Chen F; Terada K; Wu L; Saito I
Angle Orthod; 2007 Jan; 77(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 17029532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Facial morphology and the size and activity of the masseter muscle].
Ruf S; Pancherz H; Kirschbaum M
Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1994 Oct; 55(5):219-27. PubMed ID: 7995603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
